Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 110

1.

Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor.

Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Setoguchi T, Sakai S, Okafuji T, Sunami S, Hatakenaka M, Ishii N, Kubo M, Tokunaga E, Yamamoto H, Honda H.

Clin Imaging. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(5):341-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015.

PMID:
21872122
2.

Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study.

Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Sakai S, Furuya A, Hatakenaka M, Ishii N, Honda H.

Eur Radiol. 2007 May;17(5):1365-71. Epub 2006 Nov 9.

PMID:
17093968
5.

LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.

Cha JH, Moon WK, Cho N, Lee EH, Park JS, Jang MJ.

Acta Radiol. 2009 Dec;50(10):1104-8. doi: 10.3109/02841850903246608.

PMID:
19922305
6.

Diagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5-megapixel LCD monitor.

Yamada T, Suzuki A, Uchiyama N, Ohuchi N, Takahashi S.

Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov;18(11):2363-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1016-8. Epub 2008 May 20.

PMID:
18491108
7.

Comparison of 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitors and 5-megapixel liquid crystal monitors for soft-copy reading in full-field digital mammography.

Schueller G, Schueller-Weidekamm C, Pinker K, Memarsadeghi M, Weber M, Helbich TH.

Eur J Radiol. 2010 Oct;76(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.070. Epub 2009 May 29.

PMID:
19481396
8.

Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.

Bacher K, Smeets P, De Hauwere A, Voet T, Duyck P, Verstraete K, Thierens H.

Eur J Radiol. 2006 Jun;58(3):471-9. Epub 2006 Jan 25.

PMID:
16442770
9.

[Effects of 3-megapixel and 5-megapixel monitors on detecting micro-calcification in high- and low-resolution breast images].

Hu X, Gu Y, Wu B, Li R, Peng W, Mao J, Zheng X.

Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;30(2):245-8. Chinese.

PMID:
23858741
10.

Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.

Kang BJ, Kim SH, Choi BG.

Clin Imaging. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(5):336-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.10.005.

PMID:
21872121
11.

Observer study for evaluating potential utility of a super-high-resolution LCD in the detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms.

Shiraishi J, Abe H, Ichikawa K, Schmidt RA, Doi K.

J Digit Imaging. 2010 Apr;23(2):161-9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9192-x. Epub 2009 Mar 10.

12.

Detectability of T1a lung cancer on digital chest radiographs: an observer-performance comparison among 2-megapixel general-purpose, 2-megapixel medical-purpose, and 3-megapixel medical-purpose liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors.

Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T, Jinnnouchi M, Yonezawa M, Yamasaki Y, Nagao M, Kawanami S, Okamoto T, Sasaki M, Honda H.

Acta Radiol. 2015 Aug;56(8):943-9. doi: 10.1177/0284185114544244. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

PMID:
25168020
13.

Detection of breast cancer by soft-copy reading of digital mammograms: comparison between a routine image-processing parameter and high-contrast parameters.

Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Sakai S, Setoguchi T, Hatakenaka M, Ishii N, Honda H.

Acta Radiol. 2010 Feb;51(1):15-20. doi: 10.3109/02841850903321625.

PMID:
19922328
14.

Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography.

Saunders RS, Samei E, Baker J, Delong D, Soo MS, Walsh R, Pisano E, Kuzmiak CM, Pavic D.

Acad Radiol. 2006 Nov;13(11):1317-26.

PMID:
17070449
15.

Full-field digital mammography on LCD versus CRT monitors.

Zuley ML, Willison KM, Bonaccio E, Miller DP, Leong DL, Seifert PJ, Somerville P, Destounis S.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Dec;187(6):1492-8.

PMID:
17114542
16.

Detectability of BI-RADS category 3 or higher breast lesions and reading time on mammography: comparison between 5-MP and 8-MP LCD monitors.

Yabuuchi H, Kawanami S, Kamitani T, Matsumura T, Yamasaki Y, Morishita J, Honda H.

Acta Radiol. 2017 Apr;58(4):403-407. doi: 10.1177/0284185116653279. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

PMID:
27307027
17.

Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.

Park CM, Lee HJ, Goo JM, Han DH, Kim JH, Lim KY, Kim SH, Kang JJ, Kim KG, Lee CH, Chun EJ, Im JG.

Eur J Radiol. 2008 Apr;66(1):13-8. Epub 2007 Aug 6.

PMID:
17689217
18.

Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays.

Samei E, Poolla A, Ulissey MJ, Lewin JM.

Acad Radiol. 2007 May;14(5):539-46.

PMID:
17434067
19.

Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography.

Nishikawa RM, Acharyya S, Gatsonis C, Pisano ED, Cole EB, Marques HS, D'Orsi CJ, Farria DM, Kanal KM, Mahoney MC, Rebner M, Staiger MJ; Digital Mammography Image Screening Trial investigator group.

Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):41-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511071462.

20.

[Application of the grayscale standard display function to general purpose liquid-crystal display monitors for clinical use].

Tanaka N, Naka K, Sueoka M, Higashida Y, Morishita J.

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2010 Jan 20;66(1):25-32. Japanese.

Supplemental Content

Support Center