Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.

[Current role of MDCT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (2011): A clinical guideline of the Austrian Societies of Cardiology and Radiology].

Hergan K, Globits S, Loewe C, Gessner M, Artmann A, Pichler P, Sommer O, Schuchlenz H, Stadler A, Sochor H, Wolf F, Friedrich G; Austrian Societies of Cardiology and Radiology..

Rofo. 2011 Oct;183(10):964-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281640. Epub 2011 Aug 23. German. No abstract available.

PMID:
21863534
2.

[New consensus document of the Austrian Radiology Society on the current status of MSCTA in coronary vascular diagnosis].

[No authors listed]

Rofo. 2011 Aug;183(8):779. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285944. Epub 2011 Aug 1. German. No abstract available.

PMID:
21809279
3.
4.

Evaluation of automated attenuation-based tube current adaptation for coronary calcium scoring in MDCT in a cohort of 262 patients.

Mühlenbruch G, Hohl C, Das M, Wildberger JE, Suess C, Klotz E, Flohr T, Koos R, Thomas C, Günther RW, Mahnken AH.

Eur Radiol. 2007 Jul;17(7):1850-7. Epub 2007 Feb 17.

PMID:
17308926
5.

Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.

Marwan M, Mettin C, Pflederer T, Seltmann M, Schuhbäck A, Muschiol G, Ropers D, Daniel WG, Achenbach S.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013 Jan-Feb;7(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 1.

PMID:
23333186
6.

320-row CT: does beat-to-beat motion of the coronary arteries affect image quality?

van der Wall EE, de Graaf FR, van Velzen JE, Jukema JW, Bax JJ, Schuijf JD.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jan;28(1):147-51. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9794-x. Epub 2011 Jan 30. No abstract available.

7.

Coronary calcium scoring at 100kVp: a new twist to a familiar test.

Rivera JJ, Agatston AS.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009 Nov-Dec;3(6):401-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 13. No abstract available.

PMID:
20083061
8.

Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution.

Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, Kettering K, Heuschmid M, Burgstahler C, Claussen CD, Kopp AF, Schroeder S.

Heart. 2005 Jul;91(7):938-41.

9.

Non-invasive multislice CT coronary imaging.

Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, de Feyter PJ.

Heart. 2005 Mar;91(3):401-7. Review. No abstract available.

10.

Evaluation of severely calcified coronary artery using fast-switching dual-kVp 64-slice computed tomography.

Yamada M, Jinzaki M, Imai Y, Yamazaki S, Imanishi N, Tanami Y, Yamazaki A, Aiso S, Kuribayashi S.

Circ J. 2011;75(2):472-3. Epub 2010 Dec 2. No abstract available.

11.

[Image quality of CT angiography of coronary arteries depending on the degree of coronary calcification using a dual source CT scanner].

Artmann A, Enayati S, Ratzenböck M, Schwarz M, Weber T, Eber B.

Rofo. 2009 Sep;181(9):863-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109489. Epub 2009 Aug 12. German.

PMID:
19676015
12.

Retrospective gating vs. prospective triggering for noninvasive coronary angiography: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose using a 256-slice CT scanner with 270 ms gantry rotation.

Law WY, Yang CC, Chen LK, Huang TC, Lu KM, Wu TH, Mok GS.

Acad Radiol. 2011 Jan;18(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.07.013.

PMID:
21145027
13.

What is the role of invasive versus non-invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of patients suspected to have coronary heart disease?

Chow CK, Sheth T.

Intern Med J. 2011 Jan;41(1a):5-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.02066.x. Review.

PMID:
19811555
14.

How much calcium is too much calcium for coronary computerized tomographic angiography?

Hecht HS, Bhatti T.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2008 May-Jun;2(3):183-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2008.04.003. Epub 2008 Apr 22.

PMID:
19083944
15.

Evolve or perish for coronary calcium imaging.

Nieman K.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr;16(4):354-5. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu220. Epub 2014 Nov 7. No abstract available.

PMID:
25381301
16.

Optimal cardiac phase for coronary artery calcium scoring on single-source 64-MDCT scanner: least interscan variability and least motion artifacts.

Matsuura N, Horiguchi J, Yamamoto H, Hirai N, Tonda T, Kohno N, Ito K.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jun;190(6):1561-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3120.

PMID:
18492907
17.

[Coronary calcifications and the diagnosis of coronary artery disease].

Becker A, Knez A, Leber A, Boekstegers P, Steinbeck G.

MMW Fortschr Med. 2004 Dec 2;146(49):36-8. German.

PMID:
15646714
18.

Prospective helical acquisition for coronary CT angiography.

Dewey M.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jan;26(1):109-10. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9530-6. Epub 2009 Nov 18. No abstract available.

PMID:
19921461
19.

Impact of calcification on diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice spiral computed tomography for detecting coronary artery disease: a single center experience.

Nazeri I, Shahabi P, Tehrai M, Sharif-Kashani B, Nazeri A.

Arch Iran Med. 2010 Sep;13(5):373-83. doi: 010135/AIM.003.

20.

Low-dose, prospective triggered high-pitch spiral coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with retrospective spiral technique.

Srichai MB, Lim RP, Donnino R, Mannelli L, Hiralal R, Avery R, Ho C, Babb JS, Jacobs JE.

Acad Radiol. 2012 May;19(5):554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

PMID:
22366557

Supplemental Content

Support Center