Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 87

1.

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) in acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock in a newly emerging cardiac center in Nepal.

Maskey A, Regmi SR, Dubey L, Bhatt Y, Malla R, Limbu YR, Sharma D, Bahadur M.

J Res Med Sci. 2009 Mar;14(2):123-7.

2.

Predictors of in-hospital mortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); Results of the primary PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).

Zeymer U, Vogt A, Zahn R, Weber MA, Tebbe U, Gottwik M, Bonzel T, Senges J, Neuhaus KL; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).

Eur Heart J. 2004 Feb;25(4):322-8.

PMID:
14984921
3.

Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.

Kunadian B, Vijayalakshmi K, Dunning J, Thornley AR, Sutton AG, Muir DF, Wright RA, Hall JA, de Belder MA.

J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 May;19(5):217-23.

PMID:
17476036
4.

Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. In-hospital and mid-term results of invasive treatment in the National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw-Anin.

Karcz M, Bekta P, Kepka C, Witkowski A, Konopka A, Chmielak Z, Demkow M, Debski A, Ciszewski A, Ciszewski M, Cedro K, Skwarek M, Przyłuski J, Kruk M, Kadziela J, Deptuch T, Banaszewski M, Szajewski T, Stepińska J, Ruzyłło W.

Kardiol Pol. 2003 May;58(5):366-74; discussion: 374. English, Polish.

PMID:
14523484
5.

Comparison of hospital mortality with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation insertion before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Abdel-Wahab M, Saad M, Kynast J, Geist V, Sherif MA, Richardt G, Toelg R.

Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 1;105(7):967-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.11.021. Epub 2010 Feb 13.

PMID:
20346314
6.

Predictive factors of major adverse cardiac events in acute myocardial infarction patients complicated by cardiogenic shock undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Lim SY, Jeong MH, Bae EH, Kim W, Kim JH, Hong YJ, Park HW, Kang DG, Lee YS, Kim KH, Lee SH, Yun KH, Hong SN, Cho JG, Ahn YK, Park JC, Ahn BH, Kim SH, Kang JC.

Circ J. 2005 Feb;69(2):154-8.

7.

Long-term results after acute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.

Ammann P, Straumann E, Naegeli B, Schuiki E, Frielingsdorf J, Gerber A, Bertel O.

Int J Cardiol. 2002 Feb;82(2):127-31.

PMID:
11853898
8.

Mortality after emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction and usefulness of a mortality prediction model.

Klein LW, Shaw RE, Krone RJ, Brindis RG, Anderson HV, Block PC, McKay CR, Hewitt K, Weintraub WS; American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jul 1;96(1):35-41.

PMID:
15979429
9.
10.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: immediate and late outcomes.

Srimahachota S, Boonyaratavej S, Udayachalerm W, Buddhari W, Somabutr C, Chayanont D, Ngarmukos P.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 Oct;84(10):1449-54.

PMID:
11804255
11.

Changing practice patterns in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: elderly compared with younger patients.

Dzavík V, Burton JR, Kee C, Teo KK, Ignaszewski A, Lucas AR, Tymchak WJ.

Can J Cardiol. 1998 Jul;14(7):923-30.

PMID:
9706277
12.

Early percutaneous intervention improves survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Guo L, Mai X, Deng J, Liu A, Bu L, Wang H.

Kardiol Pol. 2008 Jul;66(7):722-6; discussion 727-8.

PMID:
18690563
13.

Routine percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Migliorini A, Moschi G, Valenti R, Parodi G, Dovellini EV, Carrabba N, Buonamici P, Antoniucci D.

Am Heart J. 2006 Nov;152(5):903-8.

PMID:
17070154
14.

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction treated by emergent coronary angioplasty.

Assali AR, Iakobishvili Z, Zafrir N, Solodky A, Teplitsky I, Rechavia E, Butto N, Shor N, Hasdai D, Fuchs S, Battler A, Kornowski R.

Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2005;7(4):193-8.

PMID:
16373266
15.

Revascularization, stenting, and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Dauerman HL, Goldberg RJ, White K, Gore JM, Sadiq I, Gurfinkel E, Budaj A, Lopez de Sa E, Lopez-Sendon J; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. GRACE Investigators.

Am J Cardiol. 2002 Oct 15;90(8):838-42.

PMID:
12372570
16.

Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI).

Danchin N, Coste P, Ferrières J, Steg PG, Cottin Y, Blanchard D, Belle L, Ritz B, Kirkorian G, Angioi M, Sans P, Charbonnier B, Eltchaninoff H, Guéret P, Khalife K, Asseman P, Puel J, Goldstein P, Cambou JP, Simon T; FAST-MI Investigators.

Circulation. 2008 Jul 15;118(3):268-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.762765. Epub 2008 Jun 30.

17.
18.

Importance of time-to-reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction with and without cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Muncy DB, Hansen CJ, Wall TC, Pulsipher M, Gupta N.

Am Heart J. 2003 Apr;145(4):708-15.

PMID:
12679769
19.

[Thrombolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarct].

Mihatov S.

Acta Med Croatica. 2004;58(2):139-42. Review. Croatian.

PMID:
15208800
20.

Is transport with platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibition for primary percutaneous coronary intervention more efficient than on-site thrombolysis in patients with STEMI admitted to community hospitals? Randomised study. Early results.

Dobrzycki S, Mezyński G, Kralisz P, Prokopczuk P, Nowak K, Kochman W, Zuk J, Bachórzewska-Gajewska H, Sawicki Z, Poniatowski B, Korecki J, Musiał WJ.

Kardiol Pol. 2006 Aug;64(8):793-9; discussion 800-1.

Supplemental Content

Support Center