Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 85

1.

Compensation of RF field and receiver coil induced inhomogeneity effects in abdominal MR images by a priori knowledge on the human adipose tissue distribution.

Würslin C, Springer F, Yang B, Schick F.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Sep;34(3):716-26. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22682. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

PMID:
21769975
2.

Intensity correction method customized for multi-animal abdominal MR imaging with 3T clinical scanner and multi-array coil.

Mitsuda M, Yamaguchi M, Nakagami R, Furuta T, Sekine N, Niitsu M, Moriyama N, Fujii H.

Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013;12(2):95-103. Epub 2013 May 10.

3.

Topography mapping of whole body adipose tissue using A fully automated and standardized procedure.

Würslin C, Machann J, Rempp H, Claussen C, Yang B, Schick F.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Feb;31(2):430-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22036.

PMID:
20099357
4.

Coil sensitivity estimation for optimal SNR reconstruction and intensity inhomogeneity correction in phased array MR imaging.

Vemuri P, Kholmovski EG, Parker DL, Chapman BE.

Inf Process Med Imaging. 2005;19:603-14.

PMID:
17354729
5.

[Interactive thresholded volumetry of abdominal fat using breath-hold t1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging].

Wittsack HJ, Kapitza C, Cohnen M, Jung G, Heinemann L, Mödder U, Poll L.

Rofo. 2006 Aug;178(8):810-5. German.

PMID:
16862508
6.

T1-weighted brain imaging with a 32-channel coil at 3T using TurboFLASH BLADE compared with standard cartesian k-space sampling.

Attenberger UI, Runge VM, Williams KD, Stemmer A, Michaely HJ, Schoenberg SO, Reiser MF, Wintersperger BJ.

Invest Radiol. 2009 Mar;44(3):177-83. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318198a1fd.

PMID:
19151605
7.

Method to correct intensity inhomogeneity in MR images for atherosclerosis characterization.

Salvado O, Hillenbrand C, Zhang S, Wilson DL.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 May;25(5):539-52.

PMID:
16689259
8.

Magnetic resonance imaging based determination of body compartments with the versatile, interactive sparse sampling (VISS) method.

Buehler T, Ramseier N, Machann J, Schwenzer NF, Boesch C.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Oct;36(4):951-60. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23707. Epub 2012 May 29.

PMID:
22645058
9.

Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?

Schindera ST, Merkle EM, Dale BM, Delong DM, Nelson RC.

Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct;13(10):1236-43.

PMID:
16979073
10.

Novel segmentation method for abdominal fat quantification by MRI.

Zhou A, Murillo H, Peng Q.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):852-60. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22673. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

PMID:
21769972
11.

Improvement in B1-inhomogeneity artifacts in the abdomen at 3T MR imaging using a radiofrequency cushion.

Franklin KM, Dale BM, Merkle EM.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jun;27(6):1443-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21164.

PMID:
18421685
12.

Clinical pilot study for the automatic segmentation and recognition of abdominal adipose tissue compartments from MRI data.

Noël PB, Bauer JS, Ganter C, Markus C, Rummeny EJ, Hauner H, Engels HP.

Rofo. 2012 Jun;184(6):548-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299376. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

PMID:
22434368
13.

Simultaneous reconstruction of activity and attenuation for PET/MR.

Salomon A, Goedicke A, Schweizer B, Aach T, Schulz V.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011 Mar;30(3):804-13. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2095464. Epub 2010 Nov 29.

PMID:
21118768
14.

Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.

Madabhushi A, Udupa JK.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 May;24(5):561-76.

PMID:
15889544
15.

Comparison of visceral adipose tissue quantification on water suppressed and nonwater-suppressed MRI at 3.0 Tesla.

Zhou A, Murillo H, Cusi K, Peng Q.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jun;35(6):1445-52. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23582. Epub 2012 Jan 13.

PMID:
22246813
16.

High spatial resolution quantitative MR images: an experimental study of dedicated surface coils.

Gensanne D, Josse G, Lagarde JM, Vincensini D.

Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jun 7;51(11):2843-55. Epub 2006 May 24.

PMID:
16723770
17.

Interactive deformation registration of endorectal prostate MRI using ITK thin plate splines.

Cheung MR, Krishnan K.

Acad Radiol. 2009 Mar;16(3):351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.09.011.

PMID:
19201364
18.

A dual image approach for bias field correction in magnetic resonance imaging.

Lai SH, Fang M.

Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Feb;21(2):121-5.

PMID:
12670598
19.

Correction of bias field in MR images using singularity function analysis.

Luo J, Zhu Y, Clarysse P, Magnin I.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Aug;24(8):1067-85.

PMID:
16092338
20.

High-resolution imaging at 3T and 7T with multiring local volume coils.

Mirrashed F, Sharp JC, Cheung I, Tomanek B.

MAGMA. 2004 Mar;16(4):167-73. Epub 2004 Feb 27.

PMID:
14999564

Supplemental Content

Support Center