Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 343

1.

How do tiger moths jam bat sonar?

Corcoran AJ, Barber JR, Hristov NI, Conner WE.

J Exp Biol. 2011 Jul 15;214(Pt 14):2416-25. doi: 10.1242/jeb.054783.

2.

Tiger moth jams bat sonar.

Corcoran AJ, Barber JR, Conner WE.

Science. 2009 Jul 17;325(5938):325-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1174096.

4.

Naïve bats discriminate arctiid moth warning sounds but generalize their aposematic meaning.

Barber JR, Chadwell BA, Garrett N, Schmidt-French B, Conner WE.

J Exp Biol. 2009 Jul;212(Pt 14):2141-8. doi: 10.1242/jeb.029991.

5.

Tiger moth responses to a simulated bat attack: timing and duty cycle.

Barber JR, Conner WE.

J Exp Biol. 2006 Jul;209(Pt 14):2637-50.

6.

The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach.

Ratcliffe JM, Fullard JH.

J Exp Biol. 2005 Dec;208(Pt 24):4689-98. Erratum in: J Exp Biol. 2006 Jul;209(Pt 14):2811.

7.

Sonar jamming in the field: effectiveness and behavior of a unique prey defense.

Corcoran AJ, Conner WE.

J Exp Biol. 2012 Dec 15;215(Pt 24):4278-87. doi: 10.1242/jeb.076943.

8.

Optimal predator risk assessment by the sonar-jamming arctiine moth Bertholdia trigona.

Corcoran AJ, Wagner RD, Conner WE.

PLoS One. 2013 May 6;8(5):e63609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063609. Print 2013.

10.

Effects of competitive prey capture on flight behavior and sonar beam pattern in paired big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus.

Chiu C, Reddy PV, Xian W, Krishnaprasad PS, Moss CF.

J Exp Biol. 2010 Oct 1;213(Pt 19):3348-56. doi: 10.1242/jeb.044818.

11.

Jamming avoidance response of big brown bats in target detection.

Bates ME, Stamper SA, Simmons JA.

J Exp Biol. 2008 Jan;211(Pt 1):106-13.

12.
13.

Surviving cave bats: auditory and behavioural defences in the Australian noctuid moth, Speiredonia spectans.

Fullard JH, Jackson ME, Jacobs DS, Pavey CR, Burwell CJ.

J Exp Biol. 2008 Dec;211(Pt 24):3808-15. doi: 10.1242/jeb.023978.

14.

Echolocation behavior of the Japanese horseshoe bat in pursuit of fluttering prey.

Mantani S, Hiryu S, Fujioka E, Matsuta N, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y.

J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2012 Oct;198(10):741-51. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

PMID:
22777677
15.

Tempo and mode of antibat ultrasound production and sonar jamming in the diverse hawkmoth radiation.

Kawahara AY, Barber JR.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 19;112(20):6407-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416679112. Epub 2015 May 4.

16.

Convergent evolution of anti-bat sounds.

Corcoran AJ, Hristov NI.

J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2014 Sep;200(9):811-21. doi: 10.1007/s00359-014-0924-0. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

PMID:
24980483
17.

Tiger moths and the threat of bats: decision-making based on the activity of a single sensory neuron.

Ratcliffe JM, Fullard JH, Arthur BJ, Hoy RR.

Biol Lett. 2009 Jun 23;5(3):368-71. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0079. Epub 2009 Mar 25.

18.

Echolocation call intensity in the aerial hawking bat Eptesicus bottae (Vespertilionidae) studied using stereo videogrammetry.

Holderied MW, Korine C, Fenton MB, Parsons S, Robson S, Jones G.

J Exp Biol. 2005 Apr;208(Pt 7):1321-7.

19.

Detection of prey in a cluttered environment by the northern bat Eptesicus nilssonii.

Jensen ME, Miller LA, Rydell J.

J Exp Biol. 2001 Jan;204(Pt 2):199-208.

20.

Bats coordinate sonar and flight behavior as they forage in open and cluttered environments.

Falk B, Jakobsen L, Surlykke A, Moss CF.

J Exp Biol. 2014 Dec 15;217(Pt 24):4356-64. doi: 10.1242/jeb.114132. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

Supplemental Content

Support Center