Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 178

1.

Getting to yes: the fate of neuroradiology manuscripts rejected by radiology over a 2-year period.

Khosla A, McDonald RJ, Bornmann L, Kallmes DF.

Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):3-5. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110490. No abstract available.

PMID:
21697305
2.

The CNR continues to grow; the editorial board keeps pace.

Solymosi L.

Clin Neuroradiol. 2014 Mar;24(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s00062-014-0291-9. Epub 2014 Jan 23. No abstract available.

PMID:
24452780
3.

A reviewer's lot is not a happy one.

Raine CS.

J Neuroimmunol. 2003 Aug;141(1-2):1-2. No abstract available.

PMID:
12965247
4.

[The manuscripts' review process in Revista Médica de Chile and its peer-reviewers during the year 2012].

Reyes B H, Andresen H M, Palma H J.

Rev Med Chil. 2013 Jul;141(7):903-8. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872013000700010. Spanish. No abstract available.

5.

Editorial transition.

Castillo M.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Jun-Jul;32(6):979. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2665. Epub 2011 May 12. No abstract available.

6.

Editor-in-chief, midterm report.

Castillo M.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Jun-Jul;32(6):977-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2694. Epub 2011 May 19. No abstract available.

7.

Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts.

Balistreri WF.

J Pediatr. 2007 Aug;151(2):107-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
17643754
8.

Peer review: a castle built on sand or the bedrock of scientific publishing?

Berger E.

Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;47(2):157-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
16435419
9.

Trainees in peer review: our experience.

Castillo M.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):211-3. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3548. Epub 2013 May 23. No abstract available.

10.

Fate of manuscripts previously rejected by the American Journal of Neuroradiology: a follow-up analysis.

McDonald RJ, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Feb;30(2):253-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1366. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

11.

Peer review: purpose, process and publication.

Thistlethwaite J.

Clin Teach. 2012 Aug;9(4):201-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00612.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
22783849
12.

Scientific multiples, neuroradiology, and the American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Castillo M.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Sep;29(8):1423-4. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1206. Epub 2008 Jun 26. No abstract available.

13.

How does peer review work?

Aaron L.

Radiol Technol. 2008 Jul-Aug;79(6):553-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
18650531
14.

[Der Orthopäde and the impact factor].

Kohn D, Ewerbeck V.

Orthopade. 2015 Oct;44(10):741. doi: 10.1007/s00132-015-3172-2. German. No abstract available.

PMID:
26376985
15.

Journal Impact Factor: does it have an impact?

Pierot L, Krainik A.

J Neuroradiol. 2015 Oct;42(5):253-4. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2015.07.001. No abstract available.

16.

Our prestige is growing...

Solymosi L.

Clin Neuroradiol. 2012 Sep;22(3):191. doi: 10.1007/s00062-012-0160-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
22828891
17.

The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology.

Hall SA, Wilcox AJ.

Epidemiology. 2007 Mar;18(2):262-5.

PMID:
17301708
18.
19.

Fate of submitted manuscripts rejected from the American Journal of Neuroradiology: outcomes and commentary.

McDonald RJ, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Sep;28(8):1430-4.

20.

Our editorial process--some experiences and reflections.

Emmelin M, Wall S.

Scand J Public Health. 2003;31(3):161-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
12850969

Supplemental Content

Support Center