Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 97

1.

Abdominal CT at low peak tube potential settings brings promises, but new rules apply.

Yeh BM.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jun;196(6):1322-3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6924. No abstract available.

2.

Low-kilovoltage, high-tube-current MDCT of liver in thin adults: pilot study evaluating radiation dose, image quality, and display settings.

Nakaura T, Awai K, Oda S, Funama Y, Harada K, Uemura S, Yamashita Y.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jun;196(6):1332-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5698.

PMID:
21606297
3.

Routine use of precontrast and delayed acquisitions in abdominal CT: time for change.

Johnson PT, Fishman EK.

Abdom Imaging. 2013 Apr;38(2):215-23. doi: 10.1007/s00261-012-9964-5. Review.

PMID:
23132390
4.

Balancing radiation dose and contrast dose may reduce age-specific risk in abdominal CT.

[No authors listed]

Health Devices. 2013 Apr;42(4):137. No abstract available.

PMID:
23687675
5.

Improvement of image quality at low-radiation dose and low-contrast material dose abdominal CT in patients with cirrhosis: intraindividual comparison of low tube voltage with iterative reconstruction algorithm and standard tube voltage.

Namimoto T, Oda S, Utsunomiya D, Shimonobo T, Morita S, Nakaura T, Yamashita Y.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Jul-Aug;36(4):495-501. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825b821f.

PMID:
22805682
6.

Fast volumetric data acquisition in abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Van Hoe L.

J Belge Radiol. 1997 Oct;80(5):258. No abstract available.

PMID:
9400062
7.

Abdominal dynamic CT in patients with renal dysfunction: contrast agent dose reduction with low tube voltage and high tube current-time product settings at 256-detector row CT.

Nakaura T, Awai K, Maruyama N, Takata N, Yoshinaka I, Harada K, Uemura S, Yamashita Y.

Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):467-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110021. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

PMID:
21852567
8.

Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.

Matsuki M, Murakami T, Juri H, Yoshikawa S, Narumi Y.

Acta Radiol. 2013 Oct;54(8):869-75. doi: 10.1177/0284185113488576. Epub 2013 May 23.

PMID:
23761554
9.

Dual-energy CT of the abdomen.

Morgan DE.

Abdom Imaging. 2014 Feb;39(1):108-34. doi: 10.1007/s00261-013-0033-5.

PMID:
24072382
10.

Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases.

Volders D, Bols A, Haspeslagh M, Coenegrachts K.

Radiology. 2013 Nov;269(2):469-74. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130002. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

PMID:
23847252
11.

Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience.

Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST, Richard S, Youngblood RS, Yoshizumi TT, Samei E.

Radiology. 2010 Jan;254(1):145-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09090094.

PMID:
20032149
12.

Abdominal multi-detector row CT: effectiveness of determining contrast medium dose on basis of body surface area.

Onishi H, Murakami T, Kim T, Hori M, Osuga K, Tatsumi M, Higashihara H, Maeda N, Tsuboyama T, Nakamoto A, Tomoda K, Tomiyama N.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Dec;80(3):643-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.037. Epub 2010 Sep 23.

PMID:
20864283
13.

Correlation of patient weight and cross-sectional dimensions with subjective image quality at standard dose abdominal CT.

Kalra MK, Maher MM, Prasad SR, Hayat MS, Blake MA, Varghese J, Halpern EF, Saini S.

Korean J Radiol. 2003 Oct-Dec;4(4):234-8.

14.

The optimal contrast media policy in CT of the liver. Part I: Technical notes.

Rengo M, Bellini D, De Cecco CN, Osimani M, Vecchietti F, Caruso D, Maceroni MM, Lucchesi P, Iafrate F, Paolantonio P, Ferrari R, Laghi A.

Acta Radiol. 2011 Jun 1;52(5):467-72. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.100499. Epub 2011 Mar 17. Review.

PMID:
21498281
15.

Radiation dose in abdominal computed tomography: the role of patient size and the selection of tube current.

Aldrich JE, Chang SD, Bilawich AM, Mayo JR.

Can Assoc Radiol J. 2006 Jun;57(3):152-8.

PMID:
16881472
16.

Multislice helical CT of the abdomen.

Fenchel S, Fleiter TR, Merkle EM.

Eur Radiol. 2002 Jul;12 Suppl 2:S5-10. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
12232655
17.

Per-rectal contrast material for abdominal CT: usefulness of administration with an automatic injector.

Rhim H, Kang HK, Kim YS, Kim Y, Koh BH, Cho OK, Hahm CK, Kim BS.

Abdom Imaging. 2001 Nov-Dec;26(6):591-3.

PMID:
11907722
18.

Automated tube potential selection for standard chest and abdominal CT in follow-up patients with testicular cancer: comparison with fixed tube potential.

Gnannt R, Winklehner A, Eberli D, Knuth A, Frauenfelder T, Alkadhi H.

Eur Radiol. 2012 Sep;22(9):1937-45. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2453-y. Epub 2012 May 2.

PMID:
22549104
19.

The optimal contrast media policy in CT of the liver. Part II: Clinical protocols.

Rengo M, Bellini D, De Cecco CN, Osimani M, Vecchietti F, Caruso D, Maceroni MM, Lucchesi P, Iafrate F, Palombo E, Paolantonio P, Ferrari R, Laghi A.

Acta Radiol. 2011 Jun 1;52(5):473-80. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.100500. Epub 2011 Mar 28. Review.

PMID:
21498280
20.

New and evolving concepts in CT for abdominal vascular imaging.

Fuentes-Orrego JM, Pinho D, Kulkarni NM, Agrawal M, Ghoshhajra BB, Sahani DV.

Radiographics. 2014 Sep-Oct;34(5):1363-84. doi: 10.1148/rg.345130070.

PMID:
25208285

Supplemental Content

Support Center