Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 134

2.

Background enhancement of mammary glandular tissue on breast dynamic MRI: imaging features and effect on assessment of breast cancer extent.

Uematsu T, Kasami M, Watanabe J.

Breast Cancer. 2012 Jul;19(3):259-65. doi: 10.1007/s12282-011-0279-0. Epub 2011 May 27.

PMID:
21618028
3.

Does MRI breast "density" (degree of background enhancement) correlate with mammographic breast density?

Hansen NL, Kuhl CK, Barabasch A, Strobel K, Schrading S.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Aug;40(2):483-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24495. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

PMID:
24446230
4.

Pilot study of quantitative analysis of background enhancement on breast MR images: association with menstrual cycle and mammographic breast density.

Scaranelo AM, Carrillo MC, Fleming R, Jacks LM, Kulkarni SR, Crystal P.

Radiology. 2013 Jun;267(3):692-700. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13120121. Epub 2013 Feb 15.

PMID:
23418005
5.

Background enhancement in breast MR: correlation with breast density in mammography and background echotexture in ultrasound.

Ko ES, Lee BH, Choi HY, Kim RB, Noh WC.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Dec;80(3):719-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.019. Epub 2010 Aug 14.

PMID:
20709479
6.

Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: influence of menstrual cycle and breast composition.

Kang SS, Ko EY, Han BK, Shin JH, Hahn SY, Ko ES.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Mar;39(3):526-34. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24185. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

PMID:
23633296
8.

Mammographic density changes during the menstrual cycle.

Ursin G, Parisky YR, Pike MC, Spicer DV.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Feb;10(2):141-2.

9.

High cancer yield and positive predictive value: outcomes at a center routinely using preoperative breast MRI for staging.

Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Silbergeld JJ, Eby PR, Peacock S, Javid SH, Lehman CD.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jan;196(1):W93-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4804.

PMID:
21178040
10.

Use of dynamic phase subtraction (DPS) map in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast.

Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Yoshida S, Maeda F, Saeki F, Syukutani A.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Nov-Dec;35(6):749-52. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318232fc6c.

PMID:
22082548
11.

Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.

Wright H, Listinsky J, Rim A, Chellman-Jeffers M, Patrick R, Rybicki L, Kim J, Crowe J.

Am J Surg. 2005 Oct;190(4):572-5.

PMID:
16164923
12.

Effect of the menstrual cycle on background parenchymal enhancement in breast MR imaging.

Kajihara M, Goto M, Hirayama Y, Okunishi S, Kaoku S, Konishi E, Shinkura N.

Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013 Mar 25;12(1):39-45. Epub 2013 Mar 11.

13.

Background ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in positron emission mammography (PEM): correlation with mammographic density and background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI.

Koo HR, Moon WK, Chun IK, Eo JS, Jeyanth JX, Chang JM, Cho N, Kang KW.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Oct;82(10):1738-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Jun 24.

14.
15.

Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up.

Hambly NM, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Brennan S, Morris EA.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jan;196(1):218-24. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4550.

PMID:
21178070
16.

A prospective study of variability in mammographic density during the menstrual cycle.

Morrow M, Chatterton RT Jr, Rademaker AW, Hou N, Jordan VC, Hendrick RE, Khan SA.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jun;121(3):565-74. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0496-9. Epub 2009 Aug 9.

PMID:
19669673
17.

Magnetic resonance imaging of primary breast lymphoma.

Rizzo S, Preda L, Villa G, Brambilla S, Pruneri G, Alietti A, Cassano E, Martinelli G, Bellomi M.

Radiol Med. 2009 Sep;114(6):915-24. doi: 10.1007/s11547-009-0420-8. Epub 2009 Jun 26. English, Italian.

PMID:
19562266
18.

Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.

Wallace AM, Daniel BL, Jeffrey SS, Birdwell RL, Nowels KW, Dirbas FM, Schraedley-Desmond P, Ikeda DM.

J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Apr;200(4):527-37.

PMID:
15804466
19.

Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast.

Biglia N, Bounous VE, Martincich L, Panuccio E, Liberale V, Ottino L, Ponzone R, Sismondi P.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Mar;37(3):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.12.011. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

PMID:
21237612
20.

Background uptake of breast-specific gamma imaging: correlation with mammographic breast density and background enhancement of breast MRI.

Kim MY, Choi N, Ko SM, Chung HW.

Clin Imaging. 2014 May-Jun;38(3):255-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.05.010. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

PMID:
24461560

Supplemental Content

Support Center