Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 110

1.

Potential role of Reynolds number in resolving Doppler- and catheter-based transvalvular gradient discrepancies in aortic stenosis.

Adams JC, Jiamsripong P, Belohlavek M, McMahon EM, Marupakula V, Heys J, Chaliki HP.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2011 Mar;20(2):159-64.

PMID:
21560814
3.

Doppler-catheter discrepancies in patients with bileaflet mechanical prostheses or bioprostheses in the aortic valve position.

Aljassim O, Svensson G, Houltz E, Bech-Hanssen O.

Am J Cardiol. 2008 Nov 15;102(10):1383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.017.

PMID:
18993160
4.

Insights into catheter/Doppler discrepancies in congenital aortic stenosis.

Lemler MS, Valdes-Cruz LM, Shandas RS, Cape EG.

Am J Cardiol. 1999 May 15;83(10):1447-50.

PMID:
10335760
5.

"Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery.

Baumgartner H, Stefenelli T, Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 May;33(6):1655-61.

6.

Discrepancies between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography in the measurement of transvalvular gradient in aortic stenosis: the effect of flow vorticity.

Garcia J, Capoulade R, Le Ven F, Gaillard E, Kadem L, Pibarot P, Larose É.

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Sep 20;15:84. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-84.

9.

Methodologic issues in clinical evaluation of stenosis severity in adults undergoing aortic or mitral balloon valvuloplasty. The NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry.

Otto CM, Davis KB, Holmes DR Jr, O'Neill W, Ferguson J, Bashore TM, Bonan R.

Am J Cardiol. 1992 Jun 15;69(19):1607-16.

PMID:
1598878
10.

Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of aortic stenosis: the role of pressure recovery evaluated 'in vivo'.

Razzolini R, Manica A, Tarantini G, Ramondo A, Napodano M, Iliceto S.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2007 May;16(3):225-9.

PMID:
17578039
11.

Net pressure gradients in aortic prosthetic valves can be estimated by Doppler.

Bech-Hanssen O, Gjertsson P, Houltz E, Wranne B, Ask P, Loyd D, Caidahl K.

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Aug;16(8):858-66.

PMID:
12878995
12.

Doppler assessment of mechanical aortic valve prostheses: effect of valve design and size of the aorta.

Mascherbauer J, Schima H, Maurer G, Baumgartner H.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Sep;13(5):823-30.

PMID:
15473486
13.

Accuracy of aortic stenosis severity assessment by Doppler echocardiography: importance of image quality.

Bartunek J, De Bacquer D, Rodrigues AC, De Bruyne B.

Int J Card Imaging. 1995 Jun;11(2):97-104.

PMID:
7673764
14.
15.

Comparison of simultaneous invasive and noninvasive measurements of pressure gradients in congenital aortic valve stenosis.

Barker PC, Ensing G, Ludomirsky A, Bradley DJ, Lloyd TR, Rocchini AP.

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002 Dec;15(12):1496-502.

PMID:
12464918
16.

Turbulent/viscous interactions control Doppler/catheter pressure discrepancies in aortic stenosis. The role of the Reynolds number.

Cape EG, Jones M, Yamada I, VanAuker MD, Valdes-Cruz LM.

Circulation. 1996 Dec 1;94(11):2975-81.

17.

Jet eccentricity: a misleading source of agreement between Doppler/catheter pressure gradients in aortic stenosis.

VanAuker MD, Chandra M, Shirani J, Strom JA.

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001 Sep;14(9):853-62.

PMID:
11547270
18.

How important is the impact of pressure recovery on routine evaluation of aortic stenosis? A clinical study in 91 patients.

Isaaz K, Gaillard O, Cerisier A, Da Costa A, Faure E, Lamaud M, Gerenton C.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 May;13(3):347-56.

PMID:
15222280
19.

In vitro assessment of prosthesis type and pressure recovery characteristics: Doppler echocardiography overestimation of bileaflet mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valve gradients.

Bach DS, Schmitz C, Dohmen G, Aaronson KD, Steinseifer U, Kleine P.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Aug;144(2):453-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.036.

20.

Understanding the catheter-Doppler pressure gradient discrepancy in aortic stenosis.

Pai RG, Pai AD.

J Heart Valve Dis. 2011 May;20(3):299-300. No abstract available.

PMID:
21714420
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center