Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 118

1.

How low can you go? Impacts of a low-flow disturbance on aquatic insect communities.

Walters AW, Post DM.

Ecol Appl. 2011 Jan;21(1):163-74.

PMID:
21516895
2.

Biotic disturbance and benthic community dynamics in salmon-bearing streams.

Moore JW, Schindler DE.

J Anim Ecol. 2008 Mar;77(2):275-84. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

PMID:
18081781
3.

Effect of emergent aquatic insects on bat foraging in a riparian forest.

Fukui D, Murakami M, Nakano S, Aoi T.

J Anim Ecol. 2006 Nov;75(6):1252-8.

PMID:
17032357
4.

Macroinvertebrate communities in agriculturally impacted southern Illinois streams: patterns with riparian vegetation, water quality, and in-stream habitat quality.

Stone ML, Whiles MR, Webber JA, Williard KW, Reeve JD.

J Environ Qual. 2005 Apr 20;34(3):907-17. Print 2005 May-Jun.

PMID:
15843654
5.

Community structure of aquatic insects in the Esparza River, Costa Rica.

Herrera-Vásquez J.

Rev Biol Trop. 2009 Mar-Jun;57(1-2):133-9.

PMID:
19637695
6.

Impervious surface area as a predictor of the effects of urbanization on stream insect communities in Maine, USA.

Morse CC, Huryn AD, Cronan C.

Environ Monit Assess. 2003 Nov;89(1):95-127.

PMID:
14609276
7.

Spiders and subsidies: results from the riparian zone of a coastal temperate rainforest.

Marczak LB, Richardson JS.

J Anim Ecol. 2007 Jul;76(4):687-94.

PMID:
17584374
8.

Flux of aquatic insect productivity to land: comparison of lentic and lotic ecosystems.

Gratton C, Vander Zanden MJ.

Ecology. 2009 Oct;90(10):2689-99.

PMID:
19886479
9.

Flooding impacts on responses of a riparian consumer to cross-ecosystem subsidies.

Greenwood MJ, McIntosh AR.

Ecology. 2008 Jun;89(6):1489-96.

PMID:
18589513
10.

Aquatic predation alters a terrestrial prey subsidy.

Wesner JS.

Ecology. 2010 May;91(5):1435-44.

PMID:
20503875
11.

Potential impacts of climate change on flow regime and fish habitat in mountain rivers of the south-western Balkans.

Papadaki C, Soulis K, Muñoz-Mas R, Martinez-Capel F, Zogaris S, Ntoanidis L, Dimitriou E.

Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan 1;540:418-28. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.134. Epub 2015 Aug 4.

PMID:
26250864
12.

A long-term, multitrophic level study to assess pulp and paper mill effluent effects on aquatic communities in four US receiving waters: characteristics of the study streams, sample sites, mills, and mill effluents.

Hall TJ, Ragsdale RL, Arthurs WJ, Ikoma J, Borton DL, Cook DL.

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Apr;5(2):199-218. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2008-054.1.

PMID:
19063588
13.
14.

Impacts of water resources development on flow regimes in the Brazos River.

Vogl AL, Lopes VL.

Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Oct;157(1-4):331-45. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0538-5. Epub 2008 Sep 26. Erratum in: Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Oct;157(1-4):601.

PMID:
18819012
15.

Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.

Bunn SE, Arthington AH.

Environ Manage. 2002 Oct;30(4):492-507.

PMID:
12481916
16.

Impact of environmental manipulation for Anopheles pseudopunctipennis Theobald control on aquatic insect communities in southern Mexico.

Bond JG, Quiroz-Martínez H, Rojas JC, Valle J, Ulloa A, Williams T.

J Vector Ecol. 2007 Jun;32(1):41-53.

PMID:
17633425
17.

Responses of stream macroinvertebrates to Bt maize leaf detritus.

Chambers CP, Whiles MR, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Tank JL, Royer TV, Griffiths NA, Evans-White MA, Stojak AR.

Ecol Appl. 2010 Oct;20(7):1949-60.

PMID:
21049882
18.

Integration of aquatic fate and ecological responses to linear alkyl benzene sulfonate (LAS) in model stream ecosystems.

Belanger SE, Bowling JW, Lee DM, LeBlanc EM, Kerr KM, McAvoy DC, Christman SC, Davidson DH.

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2002 Jun;52(2):150-71.

PMID:
12061833
19.
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center