Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Positive enteric contrast material for abdominal and pelvic CT with automatic exposure control: what is the effect on patient radiation exposure?

Wang ZJ, Chen KS, Gould R, Coakley FV, Fu Y, Yeh BM.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Aug;79(2):e58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.059. Epub 2011 Apr 13.

2.

Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.

Israel GM, Cicchiello L, Brink J, Huda W.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Dec;195(6):1342-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3331.

PMID:
21098193
3.

Impact of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on radiation dose in evaluation of trauma patients.

Maxfield MW, Schuster KM, McGillicuddy EA, Young CJ, Ghita M, Bokhari SA, Oliva IB, Brink JA, Davis KA.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1406-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318270d2fb.

4.

Is weight-based adjustment of automatic exposure control necessary for the reduction of chest CT radiation dose?

Prakash P, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, Shepard JA, Digumarthy SR.

Korean J Radiol. 2010 Jan-Feb;11(1):46-53. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.1.46. Epub 2009 Dec 28.

5.

Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.

Peterson CM, Lin M, Pilgram T, Heiken JP.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Mar-Apr;35(2):202-5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182058e76.

PMID:
21412090
6.

[Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].

Diederichs G, Franiel T, Asbach P, Romano V, Hamm B, Rogalla P.

Rofo. 2007 Oct;179(10):1061-7. Epub 2007 Sep 5. German.

PMID:
17786895
7.

Oral contrast media for body CT: Comparison of diatrizoate sodium and iohexol for patient acceptance and bowel opacification.

McNamara MM, Lockhart ME, Fineberg NS, Berland LL.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Nov;195(5):1137-41. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3968.

PMID:
20966319
8.

Effect of contrast material on radiation dose in an adult cardiac dual-energy CT using retrospective ECG-gating.

Paul J, Jacobi V, Bazrafshan B, Farshid P, Vogl T.

Health Phys. 2013 Aug;105(2):156-64. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e31828d814c.

PMID:
23799500
9.

Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?

Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Oikonomou I, Damilakis J.

Invest Radiol. 2011 Oct;46(10):654-62. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182213c55.

PMID:
21673583
10.

The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.

Krauss B, Grant KL, Schmidt BT, Flohr TG.

Invest Radiol. 2015 Feb;50(2):114-8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000109.

PMID:
25373305
11.

Patient Vertical Centering and Correlation with Radiation Output in Adult Abdominopelvic CT.

Cheng PM.

J Digit Imaging. 2016 Aug;29(4):428-37. doi: 10.1007/s10278-016-9861-5.

12.

Comparison of Measured and Estimated CT Organ Doses for Modulated and Fixed Tube Current:: A Human Cadaver Study.

Padole A, Deedar Ali Khawaja R, Otrakji A, Zhang D, Liu B, Xu XG, Kalra MK.

Acad Radiol. 2016 May;23(5):634-42. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

PMID:
26852248
13.

Computation of thyroid doses and carcinogenic radiation risks to patients undergoing neck CT examinations.

Huda W, Spampinato MV, Tipnis SV, Magill D.

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013 Oct;156(4):436-44. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nct090. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

PMID:
23579263
14.

Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.

Siegel MJ, Schmidt B, Bradley D, Suess C, Hildebolt C.

Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):515-22. Epub 2004 Sep 9.

PMID:
15358847
15.

Positive and negative oral contrast agents for combined abdominal and pelvic helical CT: first iodinated agent and second water.

Matsuoka Y, Masumoto T, Koga H, Suzuki K, Ushimi T, Terada H, Tamura A, Yokoyama Y, Abe K, Kamata N.

Radiat Med. 2000 May-Jun;18(3):213-6.

PMID:
10972554
16.

Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in vascular and contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT.

Yu L, Fletcher JG, Grant KL, Carter RE, Hough DM, Barlow JM, Vrtiska TJ, Williamson EE, Young PM, Goss BC, Shiung M, Leng S, Raupach R, Schmidt B, Flohr T, McCollough CH.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Aug;201(2):W297-306. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9610.

PMID:
23883244
17.

Patient Size-Specific Analysis of Dose Indexes From CT Lung Cancer Screening.

Fujii K, McMillan K, Bostani M, Cagnon C, McNitt-Gray M.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan;208(1):144-149. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16082. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

PMID:
27726409
18.

Iterative reconstruction technique with reduced volume CT dose index: diagnostic accuracy in pediatric acute appendicitis.

Didier RA, Vajtai PL, Hopkins KL.

Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Feb;45(2):181-7. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3109-7. Epub 2014 Jul 5.

19.

Effect of contrast material on image noise and radiation dose in adult chest computed tomography using automatic exposure control: a comparative study between 16-, 64- and 128-slice CT.

Paul J, Schell B, Kerl JM, Maentele W, Vogl TJ, Bauer RW.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Aug;79(2):e128-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 2.

PMID:
21640536
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center