Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 128

1.

Evaluation of digital PCR for absolute DNA quantification.

Sanders R, Huggett JF, Bushell CA, Cowen S, Scott DJ, Foy CA.

Anal Chem. 2011 Sep 1;83(17):6474-84. doi: 10.1021/ac103230c. Epub 2011 Aug 1.

PMID:
21446772
2.

Methods for applying accurate digital PCR analysis on low copy DNA samples.

Whale AS, Cowen S, Foy CA, Huggett JF.

PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058177. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

3.

Evaluation of digital PCR for absolute RNA quantification.

Sanders R, Mason DJ, Foy CA, Huggett JF.

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 20;8(9):e75296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075296. eCollection 2013.

4.

Sensitive quantitation of minimal residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia using nanofluidic digital polymerase chain reaction assay.

Goh HG, Lin M, Fukushima T, Saglio G, Kim D, Choi SY, Kim SH, Lee J, Lee YS, Oh SM, Kim DW.

Leuk Lymphoma. 2011 May;52(5):896-904. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2011.555569. Epub 2011 Feb 21.

PMID:
21338281
5.

Effect of sustained elevated temperature prior to amplification on template copy number estimation using digital polymerase chain reaction.

Bhat S, McLaughlin JL, Emslie KR.

Analyst. 2011 Feb 21;136(4):724-32. doi: 10.1039/c0an00484g. Epub 2010 Nov 25.

PMID:
21107463
6.

The digital MIQE guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments.

Huggett JF, Foy CA, Benes V, Emslie K, Garson JA, Haynes R, Hellemans J, Kubista M, Mueller RD, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT, Bustin SA.

Clin Chem. 2013 Jun;59(6):892-902. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.206375. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

7.

Highly reproducible absolute quantification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by digital PCR.

Devonshire AS, Honeyborne I, Gutteridge A, Whale AS, Nixon G, Wilson P, Jones G, McHugh TD, Foy CA, Huggett JF.

Anal Chem. 2015 Apr 7;87(7):3706-13. doi: 10.1021/ac5041617. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

PMID:
25646934
8.

Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR and Real Time PCR Method for HBV DNA Quantification.

Wongjitrat C, Horthongkham N, Sutthent R, Srisurapanon S.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Oct;98 Suppl 9:S140-5.

PMID:
26817223
9.

Comparison of four digital PCR platforms for accurate quantification of DNA copy number of a certified plasmid DNA reference material.

Dong L, Meng Y, Sui Z, Wang J, Wu L, Fu B.

Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 25;5:13174. doi: 10.1038/srep13174.

10.

Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation.

Whale AS, Huggett JF, Cowen S, Speirs V, Shaw J, Ellison S, Foy CA, Scott DJ.

Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jun;40(11):e82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks203. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

11.

Assessment of the real-time PCR and different digital PCR platforms for DNA quantification.

Pavšič J, Žel J, Milavec M.

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016 Jan;408(1):107-21. doi: 10.1007/s00216-015-9107-2. Epub 2015 Oct 31.

12.

Comparison of methods for accurate quantification of DNA mass concentration with traceability to the international system of units.

Bhat S, Curach N, Mostyn T, Bains GS, Griffiths KR, Emslie KR.

Anal Chem. 2010 Sep 1;82(17):7185-92. doi: 10.1021/ac100845m.

PMID:
20690645
13.
14.

Digital polymerase chain reaction measured pUC19 marker as calibrant for HPLC measurement of DNA quantity.

Burke DG, Dong L, Bhat S, Forbes-Smith M, Fu S, Pinheiro L, Jing W, Emslie KR.

Anal Chem. 2013 Feb 5;85(3):1657-64. doi: 10.1021/ac302925f. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

PMID:
23215355
15.

Microchamber array based DNA quantification and specific sequence detection from a single copy via PCR in nanoliter volumes.

Matsubara Y, Kerman K, Kobayashi M, Yamamura S, Morita Y, Tamiya E.

Biosens Bioelectron. 2005 Feb 15;20(8):1482-90.

PMID:
15626601
16.
17.

Quantitative detection of human enteric adenoviruses in river water by microfluidic digital polymerase chain reaction.

Kishida N, Noda N, Haramoto E, Kawaharasaki M, Akiba M, Sekiguchi Y.

Water Sci Technol. 2014;70(3):555-60. doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.262.

PMID:
25098888
19.

Inter-laboratory assessment of different digital PCR platforms for quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA.

Pavšič J, Devonshire A, Blejec A, Foy CA, Van Heuverswyn F, Jones GM, Schimmel H, Žel J, Huggett JF, Redshaw N, Karczmarczyk M, Mozioğlu E, Akyürek S, Akgöz M, Milavec M.

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017 Apr;409(10):2601-2614. doi: 10.1007/s00216-017-0206-0. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

20.

Considerations for digital PCR as an accurate molecular diagnostic tool.

Huggett JF, Cowen S, Foy CA.

Clin Chem. 2015 Jan;61(1):79-88. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.221366. Epub 2014 Oct 22. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center