Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 110

1.

Dorsal versus ventral surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: considerations for approach selection and review of surgical outcomes.

Shin JH, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Krishnaney AA.

Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Mar;30(3):E8. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.FOCUS10270. Review.

PMID:
21434824
2.

Surgical strategy for multilevel severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine.

Chen Y, Guo Y, Lu X, Chen D, Song D, Shi J, Yuan W.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Feb;24(1):24-30. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181c7e91e.

PMID:
20924295
3.

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: pathogenesis, management, and current surgical approaches. A review.

Smith ZA, Buchanan CC, Raphael D, Khoo LT.

Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Mar;30(3):E10. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.FOCUS10256. Review.

PMID:
21361748
4.

Addition of instrumented fusion after posterior decompression surgery suppresses thickening of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.

Ota M, Furuya T, Maki S, Inada T, Kamiya K, Ijima Y, Saito J, Takahashi K, Yamazaki M, Aramomi M, Mannoji C, Koda M.

J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Dec;34:162-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

PMID:
27473022
5.

Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine.

An HS, Al-Shihabi L, Kurd M.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Jul;22(7):420-9. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-07-420. Review.

PMID:
24966248
6.

Outcomes after laminoplasty compared with laminectomy and fusion in patients with cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.

Yoon ST, Hashimoto RE, Raich A, Shaffrey CI, Rhee JM, Riew KD.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S183-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eb7c. Review.

PMID:
23963000
7.
8.
9.

Long-term results of the anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Matsuoka T, Yamaura I, Kurosa Y, Nakai O, Shindo S, Shinomiya K.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Feb 1;26(3):241-8.

PMID:
11224859
10.

Effect of posterior decompression extent on biomechanical parameters of the spinal cord in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Khuyagbaatar B, Kim K, Park WM, Kim YH.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2016 Jun;230(6):545-52. doi: 10.1177/0954411916637383. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

PMID:
26951839
11.

Surgical management of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: natural history and the role of surgical decompression and stabilization.

Sugrue PA, McClendon J Jr, Halpin RJ, Liu JC, Koski TR, Ganju A.

Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Mar;30(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.FOCUS10283.

PMID:
21434819
12.
13.

Outcome of posterior decompression with instrumented fusion surgery for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the longitudinal ligament.

Saito J, Maki S, Kamiya K, Furuya T, Inada T, Ota M, Iijima Y, Takahashi K, Yamazaki M, Aramomi M, Mannoji C, Koda M.

J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Oct;32:57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.12.050.

PMID:
27591553
14.

Analysis of demographics, risk factors, clinical presentation, and surgical treatment modalities for the ossified posterior longitudinal ligament.

Kalb S, Martirosyan NL, Perez-Orribo L, Kalani MY, Theodore N.

Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Mar;30(3):E11. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.FOCUS10265.

PMID:
21361749
15.

Removal of posterior longitudinal ligament in anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Wang X, Chen Y, Chen D, Yuan W, Zhao J, Jia L, Zhao D.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Aug;22(6):404-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318187039f.

PMID:
19652565
16.

Postoperative three-dimensional cervical range of motion and neurological outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion.

Yuan W, Zhu Y, Liu X, Zhu H, Zhou X, Zhou R, Cui C, Li J.

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Jul;134:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

PMID:
25929463
17.

A patient with two re-surgeries for delayed myelopathy due to progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments after cervical laminoplasty.

Tokuhashi Y, Ajiro Y, Umezawa N.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 15;34(2):E101-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818a3135.

PMID:
19139654
18.

Surgical technique: Hemilaminectomy and unilateral lateral mass fixation for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Liu K, Shi J, Jia L, Yuan W.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2219-24. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2889-7. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

19.

The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.

Maruo K, Moriyama T, Tachibana T, Inoue S, Arizumi F, Daimon T, Yoshiya S.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):938-43. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE131197. Epub 2014 Oct 3.

PMID:
25279653
20.

Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 2: Advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty.

Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):654-60.

PMID:
17413470

Supplemental Content

Support Center