Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 91

1.

Comparing Medical Interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Slutsky J, Atkins D, Chang S, Collins Sharp BA.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2008 Nov 18.

2.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet].

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.

3.

Assessment of the Need to Update Comparative Effectiveness Reviews: Report of an Initial Rapid Program Assessment (2005–2009) [Internet].

Shekelle P, Newberry S, Maglione M, Shanman R, Johnsen B, Carter J, Motala A, Hulley B, Wang Z, Bravata D, Chen M, Grossman J.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Sep 10.

4.

AHRQ series paper 1: comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Slutsky J, Atkins D, Chang S, Sharp BA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):481-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.009. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

PMID:
18834715
5.

Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews [Internet].

Chang SM, Matchar DB, Smetana GW, Umscheid CA, editors.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun.

6.

Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update.

Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari M, McDonagh M, Balk E, Whitlock E, Reston J, Bass E, Butler M, Gartlehner G, Hartling L, Kane R, McPheeters M, Morgan L, Morton SC, Viswanathan M, Sista P, Chang S.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2013 Nov 18.

7.

Developing and Selecting Topic Nominations for Systematic Reviews.

Eder M, Feightner A, Webber E, Guirguis-Blake J, Whitlock EP.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2012 Nov 19.

8.

Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions.

Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND, Chang S, Hartling L, McPheeters M, Santaguida PL, Shamliyan T, Singh K, Tsertsvadze A, Treadwell JR.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2012 Mar 8.

9.

Peer Review of Search Strategies [Internet].

Relevo R, Paynter R.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun.

10.

The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.

McGhan WF, Al M, Doshi JA, Kamae I, Marx SE, Rindress D.

Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1086-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00605.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

11.

Identifying Priorities for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research for Serious Mental Illness [Internet].

Jonas D, Mansfield AJ, Curtis P, Gilmore J, Watson L, Brode S, Crotty K, Viswanathan M, Tant E, Gordon C, Slaughter-Mason S, Sheitman B.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Sep.

12.

Updating Systematic Reviews.

Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, Ji J, Garritty C, Rader T, Moher D.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007 Sep.

13.

Conducting Quantitative Synthesis When Comparing Medical Interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Fu R, Gartlehner G, Grant M, Shamliyan T, Sedrakyan A, Wilt TJ, Griffith L, Oremus M, Raina P, Ismaila A, Santaguida P, Lau J, Trikalinos TA.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2010 Oct 25.

14.

Identifying, Selecting, and Refining Topics.

Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, Helfand M, Eder M, Floyd N.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2009 Apr 27.

15.

AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, Helfand M, Eder M, Floyd N.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):491-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

PMID:
19540721
16.

Evidence Brief: Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Programs.

Peterson K, Helfand M, Humphrey L, Christensen V, Carson S.

VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011-.
2013 Feb.

17.

Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.

Health Quality Ontario.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

19.

Summary of AHRQ's comparative effectiveness review of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adults--an update.

Singh JA, Cameron DR.

J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 May;18(4 Supp C):S1-18. Review.

PMID:
22656072
20.

Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Fu R, Gartlehner G, Grant M, Shamliyan T, Sedrakyan A, Wilt TJ, Griffith L, Oremus M, Raina P, Ismaila A, Santaguida P, Lau J, Trikalinos TA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.010. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

PMID:
21477993

Supplemental Content

Support Center