Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 123

1.

Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy): a new technique to visualize tubal patency.

Emanuel MH, Exalto N.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;37(4):498-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.8912. No abstract available.

2.

Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.

Dreyer K, Out R, Hompes PG, Mijatovic V.

Fertil Steril. 2014 Sep;102(3):821-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.042. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

PMID:
24996498
3.

The use of a new gel foam for the evaluation of tubal patency.

Van Schoubroeck D, Van den Bosch T, Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, D'Hooghe T, Timmerman D.

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;75(3):152-6. doi: 10.1159/000345865. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

PMID:
23296258
4.

First experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) for office tubal patency testing.

Emanuel MH, van Vliet M, Weber M, Exalto N.

Hum Reprod. 2012 Jan;27(1):114-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der367. Epub 2011 Nov 6.

PMID:
22064649
5.

Automated sonographic tubal patency evaluation with three-dimensional coded contrast imaging (CCI) during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy).

Exacoustos C, Di Giovanni A, Szabolcs B, Binder-Reisinger H, Gabardi C, Arduini D.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):609-12. doi: 10.1002/uog.7442. No abstract available.

6.

Comparison between hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and sonographically controlled selective tubal catheterization.

Bloechle M, Schreiner T, Gouma E, Lisse K.

Hum Reprod. 1996 Jul;11(7):1423-6.

PMID:
8671479
7.

Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency.

Hamed HO, Shahin AY, Elsamman AM.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Jun;105(3):215-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

PMID:
19339010
8.

Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With a Saline-Air Device Is Equivalent to Hysterosalpingography Only in the Presence of Tubal Patency.

Robertshaw IM, Sroga JM, Batcheller AE, Martinez AM, Winter TC 3rd, Sinning K, Maxwell R, Lindheim SR.

J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Jun;35(6):1215-22. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.08008. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

PMID:
27126400
9.

A comparison of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) and hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with saline medium (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency.

Lim SL, Jung JJ, Yu SL, Rajesh H.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:168-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

PMID:
26547487
10.

Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography for infertility investigation.

Lovsin B, Tomazevic T.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Jan;108(1):70-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.011. No abstract available.

PMID:
19840880
11.

Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.

Ludwin I, Ludwin A, Wiechec M, Nocun A, Banas T, Basta P, Pitynski K.

Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):758-769. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex013.

PMID:
28184447
12.

Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With Four-Dimensional Technique for Screening Fallopian Tubal Patency: Let's Make an Exploration.

Chen F, Quan J, Huang P, You X.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar - Apr;24(3):407-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

PMID:
28034794
13.

Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) for determining tubal patency.

Sprigg A.

Clin Radiol. 1996 Dec;51(12):893. No abstract available.

PMID:
8972660
14.

Pain during Fallopian-tube patency testing by hysterosalpingo-foam sonography.

Van Schoubroeck D, Van den Bosch T, Ameye L, Boes AS, D'Hooghe T, Timmerman D.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;45(3):346-50. doi: 10.1002/uog.14646. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

15.

Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency in endometriosis patients.

Moro F, Tropea A, Selvaggi L, Scarinci E, Lanzone A, Apa R.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Mar;186:22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.12.013. Epub 2014 Dec 27.

PMID:
25597884
16.

Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast-Sonography for the Assessment of Tubal Patency in Women with Infertility: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Alcázar JL, Martinez-Astorquiza Corral T, Orozco R, Dominguez-Piriz J, Juez L, Errasti T.

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2016;81(4):289-95. doi: 10.1159/000443955. Epub 2016 Jan 30. Review.

PMID:
26824833
17.

Sonohysterosalpingography: Comparison of foam and saline solution.

Piccioni MG, Riganelli L, Filippi V, Fuggetta E, Colagiovanni V, Imperiale L, Caccetta J, Panici PB, Porpora MG.

J Clin Ultrasound. 2017 Feb;45(2):67-71. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22412. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

PMID:
27753111
18.

Confirmation of tubal patency in hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography by transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy.

Ahinko-Hakamaa KM, Huhtala H, Tinkanen H.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(3):286-90. doi: 10.1080/00016340802695959.

PMID:
19172423
19.

[Sono-hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal infertility].

Lupaşcu I, Vegheş S, Solomiţchi V, David C, Boian I.

Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2003 Oct-Dec;107(4):841-5. Romanian.

PMID:
14756031
20.

Comparison of Assessment Methods for Fallopian Tubal Patency and Peritubal Adhesion Between Transvaginal 4-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography and Laparoscopic Chromopertubation.

He Y, Ma X, Xu J, Li S, Wu H, Liu Q, Kong L, Luo J, Liu H.

J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Mar;36(3):547-556. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.11056. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

PMID:
28151551

Supplemental Content

Support Center