Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 90

1.

[Resorbable bone substitution materials: An overview of commercially available materials and new approaches in the field of composites].

Heinemann S, Gelinsky M, Worch H, Hanke T.

Orthopade. 2011 Sep;40(9):761-73. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1748-z. Review. German.

PMID:
21424299
2.

Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: what is optimal for bone regeneration?

Hannink G, Arts JJ.

Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 2:S22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jun 28. Review.

3.

The use of bone graft substitutes in large cancellous voids: any specific needs?

Faour O, Dimitriou R, Cousins CA, Giannoudis PV.

Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 2:S87-90. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.020. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

PMID:
21723553
4.

Bone healing with an in situ-formed bioresorbable polyethylene glycol hydrogel membrane in rabbit calvarial defects.

Humber CC, Sándor GK, Davis JM, Peel SA, Brkovic BM, Kim YD, Holmes HI, Clokie CM.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):372-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.008. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

PMID:
20060340
5.

Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes.

Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland T.

Spine J. 2007 Jul-Aug;7(4):475-90. Epub 2007 Jan 24.

PMID:
17630146
6.

Manufacture of degradable polymeric scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Ge Z, Jin Z, Cao T.

Biomed Mater. 2008 Jun;3(2):022001. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/3/2/022001. Epub 2008 Jun 3. Review.

PMID:
18523339
7.

Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes.

Zimmermann G, Moghaddam A.

Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 2:S16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.199. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

PMID:
21889142
8.
9.

The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: any specific needs?

Calori GM, Mazza E, Colombo M, Ripamonti C.

Injury. 2011 Sep;42 Suppl 2:S56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Jul 12. Review.

PMID:
21752369
10.

Orthopaedic applications of bone graft & graft substitutes: a review.

Nandi SK, Roy S, Mukherjee P, Kundu B, De DK, Basu D.

Indian J Med Res. 2010 Jul;132:15-30. Review.

11.

Modern issues in bone graft substitutes and advances in bone tissue technology.

Sammarco VJ, Chang L.

Foot Ankle Clin. 2002 Mar;7(1):19-41. Review.

PMID:
12380379
12.

[A panorama of current materials for osseous application in maxillofacial surgery and oral implantology].

Véron C, Chanavaz M, Ferri J, Donazzan M, Hildebrand HF.

Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1995;96(4):274-81. French.

PMID:
7569719
13.
14.
15.

Guided bone regeneration using collagen membranes for sinus augmentation.

Li X, Chen SL, Zhu SX, Zha GQ.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jan;50(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.10.013. Epub 2011 Jan 11.

PMID:
21227554
16.

Osseous grafting part II: xenografts and alloplasts for periodontal regeneration--a literature review.

AlGhamdi AS, Shibly O, Ciancio SG.

J Int Acad Periodontol. 2010 Apr;12(2):39-44. Review.

PMID:
20465030
17.

The role of the osteoconductive scaffold in synthetic bone graft.

Vaccaro AR.

Orthopedics. 2002 May;25(5 Suppl):s571-8. Erratum in: Orthopedics 2002 Nov;25(11):1224.

PMID:
12038844
18.

Bone substitute with osteoinductive biomaterials--current and future clinical applications.

Hotz G, Herr G.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Dec;23(6 Pt 2):413-7.

PMID:
7890986
19.

A histomorphometric evaluation of factors influencing the healing of bony defects surrounding implants.

Pretorius JA, Melsen B, Nel JC, Germishuys PJ.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):387-98.

PMID:
15973950
20.

Bone reconstruction: from bioceramics to tissue engineering.

El-Ghannam A.

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005 Jan;2(1):87-101. Review.

PMID:
16293032

Supplemental Content

Support Center