Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 125

1.

Comparative effectiveness of the SNaP™ Wound Care System.

Hutton DW, Sheehan P.

Int Wound J. 2011 Apr;8(2):196-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00775.x. Epub 2011 Mar 8.

PMID:
21385320
2.

Resource utilization and economic costs of care based on a randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds.

Apelqvist J, Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Boulton AJ.

Am J Surg. 2008 Jun;195(6):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.023. Epub 2008 Mar 26.

PMID:
18355797
3.

Cost-effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for postsurgical patients in long-term acute care.

de Leon JM, Barnes S, Nagel M, Fudge M, Lucius A, Garcia B.

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 Mar;22(3):122-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305452.79434.d9.

PMID:
19247013
4.

Comparative effectiveness of mechanically and electrically powered negative pressure wound therapy devices: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Armstrong DG, Marston WA, Reyzelman AM, Kirsner RS.

Wound Repair Regen. 2012 May-Jun;20(3):332-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00780.x.

PMID:
22564228
5.

A comparison of diabetic foot ulcer outcomes using negative pressure wound therapy versus historical standard of care.

Lavery LA, Boulton AJ, Niezgoda JA, Sheehan P.

Int Wound J. 2007 Jun;4(2):103-13.

PMID:
17651226
6.

A novel option in negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for chronic and acute wound care.

Rahmanian-Schwarz A, Willkomm LM, Gonser P, Hirt B, Schaller HE.

Burns. 2012 Jun;38(4):573-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

PMID:
22100423
7.

Negative-pressure wound therapy and diabetic foot amputations: a retrospective study of payer claims data.

Frykberg RG, Williams DV.

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct;97(5):351-9.

PMID:
17901338
8.
9.

Disposable NPWT device to facilitate early patient discharge following complex DFU.

Khanbhai M, Fosah R, Oddy MJ, Richards T.

J Wound Care. 2012 Apr;21(4):180, 182.

PMID:
22584676
10.

Exploring portable negative pressure wound therapy devices in the community.

Ousey KJ, Milne J.

Br J Community Nurs. 2014 Mar;Suppl:S14, S16-20. Review.

PMID:
24642736
11.

Initial clinical experience using a novel ultraportable negative pressure wound therapy device.

Fong KD, Hu D, Eichstadt SL, Gorell E, Munoz CA, Lorenz HP, Chang AL.

Wounds. 2010 Sep;22(9):230-6.

PMID:
25901554
12.
13.

Evaluation of wound care and health-care use costs in patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy versus advanced moist wound therapy.

Driver VR, Blume PA.

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014 Mar;104(2):147-53. doi: 10.7547/0003-0538-104.2.147. Erratum in: J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014 Jul;104(4):374.

PMID:
24725034
14.
15.

Simplified negative pressure wound therapy: clinical evaluation of an ultraportable, no-canister system.

Hudson DA, Adams KG, Van Huyssteen A, Martin R, Huddleston EM.

Int Wound J. 2015 Apr;12(2):195-201. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12080. Epub 2013 May 7.

16.

Early versus late initiation of negative pressure wound therapy: examining the impact on home care length of stay.

Baharestani MM, Houliston-Otto DB, Barnes S.

Ostomy Wound Manage. 2008 Nov;54(11):48-53.

17.

Clinical outcome of diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy and the transition from acute care to home care.

Wu SC, Armstrong DG.

Int Wound J. 2008 Jun;5 Suppl 2:10-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00466.x. Review.

PMID:
18577133
18.
19.

An economic evaluation of VAC therapy compared with wound dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Flack S, Apelqvist J, Keith M, Trueman P, Williams D.

J Wound Care. 2008 Feb;17(2):71-8.

PMID:
18389832
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center