Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 256

1.
2.
3.

The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.

Maruo K, Moriyama T, Tachibana T, Inoue S, Arizumi F, Daimon T, Yoshiya S.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):938-43. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE131197. Epub 2014 Oct 3.

PMID:
25279653
4.

Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion.

Highsmith JM, Dhall SS, Haid RW Jr, Rodts GE Jr, Mummaneni PV.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):619-25. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.SPINE10206.

PMID:
21388285
5.

Outcomes after laminoplasty compared with laminectomy and fusion in patients with cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.

Yoon ST, Hashimoto RE, Raich A, Shaffrey CI, Rhee JM, Riew KD.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S183-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eb7c. Review.

PMID:
23963000
6.

Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.

Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Maruiwa H, Matsumoto M, Toyama Y.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 15;31(26):2998-3005.

PMID:
17172996
7.

Surgical results and complications of anterior decompression and fusion as a revision surgery after initial posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Odate S, Shikata J, Soeda T, Yamamura S, Kawaguchi S.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Apr;26(4):466-473. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16430. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

PMID:
28128699
8.

[EFFECT OF SPINAL DURAL RELEASE ON TREATMENT OF MULTI-SEGMENTAL CERVICAL MYELOPATHY WITH OSSIFICATION OF POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT BY CERVICAL LAMINOPLASTY].

Li Y, Wang H, Cui W, Zhang Y, Shi J, Zhou P, Wen Y.

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Feb;30(2):178-82. Chinese.

PMID:
27276811
9.

Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 1: Clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty.

Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):647-53.

PMID:
17413469
10.

Analysis of demographics, risk factors, clinical presentation, and surgical treatment modalities for the ossified posterior longitudinal ligament.

Kalb S, Martirosyan NL, Perez-Orribo L, Kalani MY, Theodore N.

Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Mar;30(3):E11. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.FOCUS10265.

PMID:
21361749
11.
12.

Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Lee CK, Shin DA, Yi S, Kim KN, Shin HC, Yoon DH, Ha Y.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):100-7. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE141004. Epub 2015 Oct 2.

PMID:
26431070
13.

Postoperative three-dimensional cervical range of motion and neurological outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion.

Yuan W, Zhu Y, Liu X, Zhu H, Zhou X, Zhou R, Cui C, Li J.

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Jul;134:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

PMID:
25929463
14.

Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.

Fay LY, Huang WC, Wu JC, Chang HK, Tsai TY, Ko CC, Tu TH, Wu CL, Cheng H.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Sep;21(3):400-10. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.SPINE13387. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

PMID:
24926929
15.

Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 2: Advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty.

Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):654-60.

PMID:
17413470
16.
17.

Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Kim B, Yoon DH, Shin HC, Kim KN, Yi S, Shin DA, Ha Y.

Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.028. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

PMID:
25637468
18.

How does the ossification area of the posterior longitudinal ligament thicken following cervical laminoplasty?

Hori T, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19):E551-6.

PMID:
17762797
19.

Surgical strategy for multilevel severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine.

Chen Y, Guo Y, Lu X, Chen D, Song D, Shi J, Yuan W.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Feb;24(1):24-30. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181c7e91e.

PMID:
20924295
20.

Comparison of surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: open-door technique versus French-door technique.

Lee DG, Lee SH, Park SJ, Kim ES, Chung SS, Lee CS, Eoh W.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Aug;26(6):E198-203. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828bb296.

PMID:
23511650

Supplemental Content

Support Center