Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 458

1.

Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.

Maus TM, Reber B, Banks DA, Berry A, Guerrero E, Manecke GR.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Oct;25(5):770-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.12.017. Epub 2011 Feb 26.

PMID:
21354828
2.

Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique.

Maass SW, Roekaerts PM, Lancé MD.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Jun;28(3):534-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

PMID:
24746334
3.

Lack of agreement and trending ability of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor compared with thermodilution.

Møller-Sørensen H, Hansen KL, Østergaard M, Andersen LW, Møller K.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Apr;56(4):433-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02615.x. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

PMID:
22191436
4.

The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.

Thonnerieux M, Alexander B, Binet C, Obadia JF, Bastien O, Desebbe O.

Anesth Analg. 2015 Aug;121(2):383-91. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000753.

PMID:
25902321
5.

A comparison of endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography and transpulmonary thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.

Fellahi JL, Fischer MO, Rebet O, Massetti M, Gérard JL, Hanouz JL.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Apr;26(2):217-22. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.06.023. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

PMID:
21880510
6.

Measurements of cardiac output obtained with transesophageal echocardiography and pulmonary artery thermodilution are not interchangeable.

Møller-Sørensen H, Graeser K, Hansen KL, Zemtsovski M, Sander EM, Nilsson JC.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Jan;58(1):80-8. doi: 10.1111/aas.12227. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

PMID:
24192143
7.

Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements.

Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, Joseph P, Bastien O, Lehot JJ.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;24(10):832-9. Epub 2007 Aug 1.

PMID:
17666154
8.
9.
10.

Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.

Sharma V, Singh A, Kansara B, Karlekar A.

Ann Card Anaesth. 2011 May-Aug;14(2):104-10. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.81564.

11.

Comparison of esophageal Doppler, pulse contour analysis, and real-time pulmonary artery thermodilution for the continuous measurement of cardiac output.

Bein B, Worthmann F, Tonner PH, Paris A, Steinfath M, Hedderich J, Scholz J.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 Apr;18(2):185-9.

PMID:
15073709
12.

Comparison of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor to thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.

Ball TR, Culp BC, Patel V, Gloyna DF, Ciceri DP, Culp WC Jr.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010 Oct;24(5):762-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 Jul 31.

PMID:
20674392
13.

Transesophageal Doppler reliably tracks changes in cardiac output in comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients.

Møller-Sørensen H, Cordtz J, Østergaard M, Nilsson JC, Hansen KL.

J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Feb;31(1):135-142. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9806-4. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

PMID:
26578096
14.

Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output.

Kööbi T, Kaukinen S, Turjanmaa VM, Uusitalo AJ.

Crit Care Med. 1997 May;25(5):779-85.

PMID:
9187596
15.

Cardiac output--pulse contour analysis vs. pulmonary artery thermodilution.

Ostergaard M, Nielsen J, Rasmussen JP, Berthelsen PG.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Oct;50(9):1044-9.

PMID:
16987334
16.

[Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].

Simon R, Desebbe O, Hénaine R, Bastien O, Lehot JJ, Cannesson M.

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009 Jun;28(6):537-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2009.04.010. Epub 2009 Jun 13. French.

PMID:
19525086
17.

Accuracy of noninvasive estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) compared to thermodilution cardiac output: a pilot study in cardiac patients.

Ball TR, Tricinella AP, Kimbrough BA, Luna S, Gloyna DF, Villamaria FJ, Culp WC Jr.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Dec;27(6):1128-32. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

PMID:
23992653
18.

Validity of an arterial pressure waveform analysis device: does the puncture site play a role in the agreement with intermittent pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution measurements?

Schramm S, Albrecht E, Frascarolo P, Chassot PG, Spahn DR.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010 Apr;24(2):250-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.05.029. Epub 2009 Aug 22.

PMID:
19700347
19.

Cardiac output monitoring: comparison of a new arterial pressure waveform analysis to the bolus thermodilution technique in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Mehta Y, Chand RK, Sawhney R, Bhise M, Singh A, Trehan N.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008 Jun;22(3):394-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.02.015.

PMID:
18503927
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center