Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

Impact of pronase on flow cytometric crossmatch outcome.

Hetrick SJ, Schillinger KP, Zachary AA, Jackson AM.

Hum Immunol. 2011 Apr;72(4):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Jan 21.

PMID:
21262310
2.

Improved flow cytometric detection of HLA alloantibodies using pronase: potential implications in renal transplantation.

Vaidya S, Cooper TY, Avandsalehi J, Barnes T, Brooks K, Hymel P, Noor M, Sellers R, Thomas A, Stewart D, Daller J, Fish JC, Gugliuzza KK, Bray RA.

Transplantation. 2001 Feb 15;71(3):422-8.

PMID:
11233905
3.

Frequent false-positive reactions in pronase-treated T-cell flow cytometric cross-match tests.

Park H, Lim YM, Han BY, Hyun J, Song EY, Park MH.

Transplant Proc. 2012 Jan;44(1):87-90. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.048.

PMID:
22310587
4.

Positive B-cell only flow cytometric crossmatch: implications for renal transplantation.

Delgado JC, Eckels DD.

Exp Mol Pathol. 2008 Aug;85(1):59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Apr 10. Review.

PMID:
18499103
5.

Specificity of preformed alloantibodies causing B cell positive flow crossmatch in renal transplantation.

Lobashevsky AL, Senkbeil RW, Shoaf J, Mink C, Rowe C, Lobashevsky ES, Burke R, Hudson S, Deierhoi MH, Thomas JM.

Clin Transplant. 2000 Dec;14(6):533-42. Erratum in: Clin Transplant 2001 Jun;15(3):218.

PMID:
11127305
6.

Flow cytometry crossmatch reactivity with pronase-treated T cells induced by non-HLA autoantibodies in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

Szewczyk K, Barrios K, Magas D, Sieg K, Labuda B, Jendrisak MD, Jaramillo A.

Hum Immunol. 2016 Jun;77(6):449-55. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

PMID:
27094930
7.

Improved specificity and sensitivity when using pronase-digested lymphocytes to perform flow-cytometric crossmatch prior to renal transplantation.

Lobo PI, Isaacs RB, Spencer CE, Pruett TL, Sanfey HA, Sawyer RG, McCullough C.

Transpl Int. 2002 Nov;15(11):563-9. Epub 2002 Oct 2.

8.

Relevance of posttransplant flow cytometric T- and B-cell crossmatches in tacrolimus-treated renal transplant patients.

Lenaers JI, Christiaans MH, Voorter CE, van Hooff HP, van den Berg-Loonen EM.

Transplantation. 2006 Nov 15;82(9):1142-7.

PMID:
17102764
9.

Improved flow cytometric detection of donor-specific HLA class II antibodies by heat inactivation.

Ta M, Scornik JC.

Transplantation. 2002 May 27;73(10):1611-4.

PMID:
12042648
10.

The use of positive B cell flow cytometry crossmatch in predicting rejection among renal transplant recipients.

Kotb M, Russell WC, Hathaway DK, Gaber LW, Gaber AO.

Clin Transplant. 1999 Feb;13(1 Pt 2):83-9.

PMID:
10081642
11.

The use of pronase-digested human leukocytes to improve specificity of the flow cytometric crossmatch.

Lobo PI, Spencer CE, Stevenson WC, McCullough C, Pruett TL.

Transpl Int. 1995;8(6):472-80.

PMID:
8579739
12.

The effect of antithymocyte globulin on anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody detection assays.

Gloor JM, Moore SB, Schneider BA, Degoey SR, Stegall MD.

Transplantation. 2007 Jul 27;84(2):258-64.

PMID:
17667819
13.

Pronase treatment facilitates alloantibody flow cytometric and cytotoxic crossmatching in the presence of rituximab.

Bearden CM, Agarwal A, Book BK, Sidner RA, Gebel HM, Bray RA, Pescovitz MD.

Hum Immunol. 2004 Aug;65(8):803-9.

PMID:
15336781
14.

The flow cytometric crossmatch. Dual-color analysis of T cell and B cell reactivities.

Bray RA, Lebeck LK, Gebel HM.

Transplantation. 1989 Nov;48(5):834-40.

PMID:
2815255
15.

A flow cytometric crossmatch test for simultaneous detection of antibodies against donor lymphocytes and endothelial precursor cells.

Alheim M, Johansson SM, Hauzenberger D, Grufman P, Holgersson J.

Tissue Antigens. 2010 Mar;75(3):269-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2009.01439.x. Epub 2010 Jan 12.

PMID:
20070600
17.

Weak humoral posttransplant alloresponse after a well-HLA-matched cadaveric kidney transplantation.

Matinlauri IH, Kyllönen LE, Eklund BH, Koskimies SA, Salmela KT.

Transplantation. 2004 Jul 27;78(2):198-204.

PMID:
15280678
18.

The flow cytometric crossmatch and early renal transplant loss.

Mahoney RJ, Ault KA, Given SR, Adams RJ, Breggia AC, Paris PA, Palomaki GE, Hitchcox SA, White BW, Himmelfarb J, et al.

Transplantation. 1990 Mar;49(3):527-35.

PMID:
2138366
19.

Clinical significance of a positive flow crossmatch on the outcomes of cadaveric renal transplants.

Ilham MA, Winkler S, Coates E, Rizzello A, Rees TJ, Asderakis A.

Transplant Proc. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(6):1839-43. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.009.

PMID:
18675065
20.

The clinical significance of flow cytometry crossmatching in heart transplantation.

Bishay ES, Cook DJ, Starling RC, Ratliff NB Jr, White J, Blackstone EH, Smedira NG, McCarthy PM.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Apr;17(4):362-9.

PMID:
10773556

Supplemental Content

Support Center