Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 265

1.

Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research.

Concato J, Lawler EV, Lew RA, Gaziano JM, Aslan M, Huang GD.

Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.004. Review.

PMID:
21184862
2.

The past, present, and future of comparative effectiveness research in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

Kupersmith J, Ommaya AK.

Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.002.

PMID:
21184864
3.

Scientific and organizational collaboration in comparative effectiveness research: the VA cooperative studies program model.

Huang GD, Ferguson RE, Peduzzi PN, O'Leary TJ.

Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.005.

PMID:
21184863
4.

Comparative effectiveness research: what kind of studies do we need?

Concato J, Peduzzi P, Huang GD, O'Leary TJ, Kupersmith J.

J Investig Med. 2010 Aug;58(6):764-9. doi: 10.231/JIM.0b013e3181e3d2af. Review.

PMID:
20479661
5.

Methodological issues in comparative effectiveness research: clinical trials.

Peduzzi P, Kyriakides T, O'Connor TZ, Guarino P, Warren SR, Huang GD.

Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.003. Review.

PMID:
21184867
7.

Comparative effectiveness research and medical informatics.

D'Avolio LW, Farwell WR, Fiore LD.

Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.006.

PMID:
21184865
9.

Implementation research: a critical component of realizing the benefits of comparative effectiveness research.

Atkins D, Kupersmith J.

Am J Med. 2010 Dec;123(12 Suppl 1):e38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.007.

PMID:
21184866
10.

Generating evidence for comparative effectiveness research using more pragmatic randomized controlled trials.

Mullins CD, Whicher D, Reese ES, Tunis S.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):969-76. doi: 10.2165/11536160-000000000-00000.

PMID:
20831305
11.

Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.

Shah BR, Drozda J, Peterson ED.

Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.012. Review.

PMID:
20598966
12.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

13.

Observational studies: a review of study designs, challenges and strategies to reduce confounding.

Lu CY.

Int J Clin Pract. 2009 May;63(5):691-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02056.x. Review.

PMID:
19392919
14.

The Veterans Affairs experience: comparative effectiveness research in a large health system.

Atkins D, Kupersmith J, Eisen S.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1906-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0680.

15.

The critical role of observational evidence in comparative effectiveness research.

Fleurence RL, Naci H, Jansen JP.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1826-33. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0630.

16.

Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.

Sox HC.

Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S7-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181da3709.

PMID:
20473202
17.

Invited article: comparative effectiveness research, evidence-based medicine, and the AAN.

French JA, England JD.

Neurology. 2010 Aug 10;75(6):562-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ec7f56.

PMID:
20697109
18.

From randomized controlled trials to observational studies.

Silverman SL.

Am J Med. 2009 Feb;122(2):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.030. Review.

PMID:
19185083
19.

Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Norris SL, Atkins D, Bruening W, Fox S, Johnson E, Kane R, Morton SC, Oremus M, Ospina M, Randhawa G, Schoelles K, Shekelle P, Viswanathan M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1178-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.027. Erratum in: J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;66(10):1194.

PMID:
21636246
20.

Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.

Dreyer NA, Tunis SR, Berger M, Ollendorf D, Mattox P, Gliklich R.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1818-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0666.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center