Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 75

1.

The world is not flat: can people reorient using slope?

Nardi D, Newcombe NS, Shipley TF.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):354-67. doi: 10.1037/a0021614.

PMID:
21171808
2.

Pigeon (Columba livia) encoding of a goal location: the relative importance of shape geometry and slope information.

Nardi D, Bingman VP.

J Comp Psychol. 2009 May;123(2):204-16. doi: 10.1037/a0015093.

PMID:
19450027
3.

Reorienting with terrain slope and landmarks.

Nardi D, Newcombe NS, Shipley TF.

Mem Cognit. 2013 Feb;41(2):214-28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0254-9.

PMID:
23055116
4.

Up by upwest: Is slope like north?

Weisberg SM, Nardi D, Newcombe NS, Shipley TF.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Oct;67(10):1959-76. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.880122. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

PMID:
24397309
5.

Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape.

Chai XJ, Jacobs LF.

Behav Neurosci. 2009 Apr;123(2):276-83. doi: 10.1037/a0014722.

PMID:
19331451
6.

Place navigation in rats guided by a vestibular and kinesthetic orienting gradient.

Miniaci MC, Scotto P, Bures J.

Behav Neurosci. 1999 Dec;113(6):1115-26.

PMID:
10636293
7.

Fusion of visual and vestibular tilt cues in the perception of visual vertical.

Vingerhoets RA, De Vrijer M, Van Gisbergen JA, Medendorp WP.

J Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;101(3):1321-33. doi: 10.1152/jn.90725.2008. Epub 2008 Dec 31.

8.

Sex differences in cue perception in a visual scene: investigation of cue type.

Barkley CL, Gabriel KI.

Behav Neurosci. 2007 Apr;121(2):291-300.

PMID:
17469918
9.

Where is uphill? Exploring sex differences when reorienting on a sloped environment presented through 2-D images.

Nardi D, Meloni R, Orlandi M, Olivetti-Belardinelli M.

Perception. 2014;43(4):249-64.

PMID:
25109016
10.

Sex differences and errors in the use of terrain slope for navigation.

Nardi D, Holmes CA, Newcombe NS, Weisberg SM.

Cogn Process. 2015 Sep;16 Suppl 1:323-6. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0669-x. Review.

PMID:
26216758
11.

Use of slope and feature cues in pigeon (Columba livia) goal-searching behavior.

Nardi D, Mauch RJ, Klimas DB, Bingman VP.

J Comp Psychol. 2012 Aug;126(3):288-93. doi: 10.1037/a0026900. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

PMID:
22390622
12.

Young children's use of features to reorient is more than just associative: further evidence against a modular view of spatial processing.

Newcombe NS, Ratliff KR, Shallcross WL, Twyman AD.

Dev Sci. 2010 Jan 1;13(1):213-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00877.x.

PMID:
20121877
13.

Processing of visual motion direction in the fronto-parallel plane in the stationary or moving observer.

Probst T, Loose R, Niedeggen M, Wist ER.

Behav Brain Res. 1995 Oct;70(2):133-44.

PMID:
8561904
14.
15.

Bayesian integration of visual and vestibular signals for heading.

Butler JS, Smith ST, Campos JL, Bülthoff HH.

J Vis. 2010 Sep 1;10(11):23. doi: 10.1167/10.11.23.

PMID:
20884518
16.

Multisensory determinants of orientation perception: task-specific sex differences.

Barnett-Cowan M, Dyde RT, Thompson C, Harris LR.

Eur J Neurosci. 2010 May;31(10):1899-907. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07199.x.

PMID:
20584195
17.

A role for terrain slope in orienting hippocampal place fields.

Jeffery KJ, Anand RL, Anderson MI.

Exp Brain Res. 2006 Feb;169(2):218-25. Epub 2005 Nov 5.

PMID:
16273400
18.

Rotational kinematics of the human vestibuloocular reflex. III. Listing's law.

Misslisch H, Tweed D, Fetter M, Sievering D, Koenig E.

J Neurophysiol. 1994 Nov;72(5):2490-502.

PMID:
7884474
19.

Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory.

Chai XJ, Jacobs LF.

Behav Brain Res. 2010 Apr 2;208(2):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.11.039. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

PMID:
19963014
20.

Supramodal effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on the subjective vertical.

Mars F, Popov K, Vercher JL.

Neuroreport. 2001 Sep 17;12(13):2991-4.

PMID:
11588617

Supplemental Content

Support Center