Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 234

1.

The role of glutamate dehydrogenase for the detection of Clostridium difficile in faecal samples: a meta-analysis.

Shetty N, Wren MW, Coen PG.

J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jan;77(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.07.024. Epub 2010 Dec 8. Review.

PMID:
21145132
3.
4.

Two-step glutamate dehydrogenase antigen real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Goldenberg SD, Cliff PR, Smith S, Milner M, French GL.

J Hosp Infect. 2010 Jan;74(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Nov 8.

PMID:
19900734
5.
6.

Detection of Clostridium difficile infection: a suggested laboratory diagnostic algorithm.

Wren MW, Kinson R, Sivapalan M, Shemko M, Shetty NR.

Br J Biomed Sci. 2009;66(4):175-9.

PMID:
20095124
7.

Diagnostic accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction in detection of Clostridium difficile in the stool samples of patients with suspected Clostridium difficile Infection: a meta-analysis.

Deshpande A, Pasupuleti V, Rolston DD, Jain A, Deshpande N, Pant C, Hernandez AV.

Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;53(7):e81-90. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir505.

PMID:
21890762
8.

Evaluation of a simultaneous detection kit for the glutamate dehydrogenase antigen and toxin A/B in feces for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Kawada M, Annaka M, Kato H, Shibasaki S, Hikosaka K, Mizuno H, Masuda Y, Inamatsu T.

J Infect Chemother. 2011 Dec;17(6):807-11. doi: 10.1007/s10156-011-0267-5. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

PMID:
21725661
9.

Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.

Tenover FC, Novak-Weekley S, Woods CW, Peterson LR, Davis T, Schreckenberger P, Fang FC, Dascal A, Gerding DN, Nomura JH, Goering RV, Akerlund T, Weissfeld AS, Baron EJ, Wong E, Marlowe EM, Whitmore J, Persing DH.

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3719-24. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00427-10. Epub 2010 Aug 11.

10.

Evaluation of three enzyme immunoassays and a loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Bruins MJ, Verbeek E, Wallinga JA, Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet LE, Kuijper EJ, Bloembergen P.

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;31(11):3035-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1658-y. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

PMID:
22706512
11.

Superiority of the DNA amplification assay for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection: a clinical comparison of fecal tests.

Barkin JA, Nandi N, Miller N, Grace A, Barkin JS, Sussman DA.

Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Oct;57(10):2592-9. Epub 2012 May 11.

PMID:
22576711
12.

Reference assays for Clostridium difficile infection: one or two gold standards?

Planche T, Wilcox M.

J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jan;64(1):1-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2010.080135. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

PMID:
21118850
13.

Tests for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: the next generation.

Carroll KC.

Anaerobe. 2011 Aug;17(4):170-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Mar 3. Review.

PMID:
21376826
14.

Usefulness of simultaneous detection of toxin A and glutamate dehydrogenase for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diseases.

Barbut F, Lalande V, Daprey G, Cohen P, Marle N, Burghoffer B, Petit JC.

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000 Jun;19(6):481-4.

PMID:
10947228
15.

Comparison of eight commercial enzyme immunoassays for the detection of Clostridium difficile from stool samples and effect of strain type.

René P, Frenette CP, Schiller I, Dendukuri N, Brassard P, Fenn S, Loo VG.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 May;73(1):94-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

PMID:
22424900
17.

Lack of effect of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by glutamate dehydrogenase and polymerase chain reaction.

Goldenberg SD, Gumban M, Hall A, Patel A, French GL.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;70(3):417-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.03.012.

PMID:
21683272
18.

Evaluation of a rapid membrane enzyme immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Kim H, Kim WH, Kim M, Jeong SH, Lee K.

Ann Lab Med. 2014 May;34(3):235-9. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.3.235. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

19.

Clostridium difficile testing algorithms: what is practical and feasible?

Schmidt ML, Gilligan PH.

Anaerobe. 2009 Dec;15(6):270-3. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Oct 22. Review.

PMID:
19853666
20.

Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.

Novak-Weekley SM, Marlowe EM, Miller JM, Cumpio J, Nomura JH, Vance PH, Weissfeld A.

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):889-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01801-09. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

Supplemental Content

Support Center