Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

"Pee-in-a-Pot": acceptability and uptake of on-site chlamydia screening in a student population in the Republic of Ireland.

Vaughan D, O'Connell E, Cormican M, Brugha R, Faherty C, Balfe M, O'Donovan D.

BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Nov 11;10:325. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-325.

2.

Chlamydia trachomatis infection and sexual behaviour among female students attending higher education in the Republic of Ireland.

O'Connell E, Brennan W, Cormican M, Glacken M, O'Donovan D, Vellinga A, Cahill N, Lysaght F, O'Donnell J.

BMC Public Health. 2009 Oct 29;9:397. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-397.

3.

Patterns of general health care and STD services use among high-risk youth in Denver participating in community-based urine chlamydia screening.

Rietmeijer CA, Bull SS, Ortiz CG, Leroux T, Douglas JM Jr.

Sex Transm Dis. 1998 Oct;25(9):457-63.

PMID:
9800256
4.

Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection.

Low N, McCarthy A, Macleod J, Salisbury C, Campbell R, Roberts TE, Horner P, Skidmore S, Sterne JA, Sanford E, Ibrahim F, Holloway A, Patel R, Barton PM, Robinson SM, Mills N, Graham A, Herring A, Caul EO, Davey Smith G, Hobbs FD, Ross JD, Egger M; Chlamydia Screening Studies Project Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(8):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-165. Review.

5.

Chlamydia screening programme, HMP Hydebank Wood Young Offender Centre, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

Hirst H, Dinsmore WW.

Int J STD AIDS. 2009 May;20(5):360-1. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008133.

PMID:
19386977
6.

'Show me the money': financial incentives increase chlamydia screening rates among tertiary students: a pilot study.

Currie MJ, Schmidt M, Davis BK, Baynes AM, O'Keefe EJ, Bavinton TP, McNiven M, Martin SJ, Bowden FJ.

Sex Health. 2010 Mar;7(1):60-5. doi: 10.1071/SH08091.

PMID:
20152098
7.

Young pregnant women's views on the acceptability of screening for chlamydia as part of routine antenatal care.

Bilardi JE, De Guingand DL, Temple-Smith MJ, Garland S, Fairley CK, Grover S, Wallace E, Hocking JS, Tabrizi S, Pirotta M, Chen MY.

BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 19;10:505. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-505.

8.

Acceptability of urine-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic young men: a systematic review.

Marrazzo JM, Scholes D.

Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Nov;35(11 Suppl):S28-33. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31816938ca. Review.

PMID:
18418291
9.

Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. I: acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings.

Pimenta JM, Catchpole M, Rogers PA, Perkins E, Jackson N, Carlisle C, Randall S, Hopwood J, Hewitt G, Underhill G, Mallinson H, McLean L, Gleave T, Tobin J, Harindra V, Ghosh A.

Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Feb;79(1):16-21.

10.

Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections to reach nonclinic populations in the community: risk factors for infection in men.

Chai SJ, Aumakhan B, Barnes M, Jett-Goheen M, Quinn N, Agreda P, Whittle P, Hogan T, Jenkins WD, Rietmeijer CA, Gaydos CA.

Sex Transm Dis. 2010 Dec;37(12):756-63. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181e3d771.

11.

Where do young adults want opportunistic chlamydia screening services to be located?

Brugha R, Balfe M, Jeffares I, Conroy RM, Clarke E, Fitzgerald M, O'Connell E, Vaughan D, Coleman C, McGee H, Gillespie P, O'Donovan D.

J Public Health (Oxf). 2011 Dec;33(4):571-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr028. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

PMID:
21486871
12.

Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponse.

Greenland KE, Op de Coul EL, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, Fennema HJ, Götz HM, Hoebe CJ, Koekenbier RH, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, van den Broek IV.

Sex Transm Dis. 2011 Jun;38(6):467-74. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318204546e.

PMID:
21217416
13.

Prevalence and risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in female New Zealand university students.

Baker M, Ortega-Benito J, Garret N, Bromhead C, Leslie K, MacDonald J, McNicholas A.

N Z Med J. 2005 Aug 12;118(1220):U1607.

PMID:
16132068
14.

Stay in school? Results of a sexually transmitted diseases screening program in San Francisco high schools-2007.

Barry PM, Scott KC, McCright J, Snell A, Lee M, Bascom T, Kent CK, Klausner JD.

Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Jun;35(6):550-2. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31816a43d3.

PMID:
18356770
15.

A school-based Chlamydia control program using DNA amplification technology.

Cohen DA, Nsuami M, Etame RB, Tropez-Sims S, Abdalian S, Farley TA, Martin DH.

Pediatrics. 1998 Jan;101(1):E1.

PMID:
9417165
16.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.

Blake DR, Gaydos CA, Quinn TC.

Sex Transm Dis. 2004 Feb;31(2):85-95.

PMID:
14743071
17.

Improving participation in Chlamydia screening programs: perspectives of high-risk youth.

Blake DR, Kearney MH, Oakes JM, Druker SK, Bibace R.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Jun;157(6):523-9.

PMID:
12796231
18.

Developments in the screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review.

Kohl KS, Markowitz LE, Koumans EH.

Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;30(4):637-58. Review.

PMID:
14719842
19.
20.

Exploring the feasibility of alternative STD-testing venues and results delivery channels for a national screening campaign.

Friedman AL, Bloodgood B.

Health Promot Pract. 2013 Jan;14(1):96-104. doi: 10.1177/1524839911404226. Epub 2011 Sep 30.

PMID:
21965593

Supplemental Content

Support Center