Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 160

1.

[The Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG)].

Rossegger A, Gerth J, Urbaniok F, Laubacher A, Endrass J.

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2010 Nov;78(11):658-67. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245688. Epub 2010 Nov 10. Review. German.

PMID:
21069631
2.

A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.

Harris GT, Rice ME, Quinsey VL, Lalumière ML, Boer D, Lang C.

Psychol Assess. 2003 Sep;15(3):413-25.

PMID:
14593842
3.
4.

[The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG)--a tool for the risk assessment of violent offenders].

Rossegger A, Urbaniok F, Danielsson C, Endrass J.

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2009 Oct;77(10):577-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109705. Epub 2009 Oct 9. German.

PMID:
19821220
5.

Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).

Rettenberger M, Rice ME, Harris GT, Eher R.

Psychol Assess. 2017 Jun;29(6):624-638. doi: 10.1037/pas0000390.

PMID:
28594206
6.

Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.

Rettenberger M, Matthes A, Boer DP, Eher R.

Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2010 Apr;54(2):169-86. doi: 10.1177/0306624X08328755. Epub 2009 Jan 23.

PMID:
19168639
7.

Different actuarial risk measures produce different risk rankings for sexual offenders.

Barbaree HE, Langton CM, Peacock EJ.

Sex Abuse. 2006 Oct;18(4):423-40.

PMID:
17136625
8.

Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.

Kingston DA, Yates PM, Firestone P, Babchishin K, Bradford JM.

Sex Abuse. 2008 Dec;20(4):466-84. doi: 10.1177/1079063208325206. Epub 2008 Oct 7.

PMID:
18840901
9.
10.

The factor structure of static actuarial items: its relation to prediction.

Barbaree HE, Langton CM, Peacock EJ.

Sex Abuse. 2006 Apr;18(2):207-26.

PMID:
16937082
11.

Interpreting multiple risk scales for sex offenders: evidence for averaging.

Lehmann RJ, Hanson RK, Babchishin KM, Gallasch-Nemitz F, Biedermann J, Dahle KP.

Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):1019-24. doi: 10.1037/a0033098. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

PMID:
23730829
12.

A comparison of modified versions of the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide.

Nunes KL, Firestone P, Bradford JM, Greenberg DM, Broom I.

Sex Abuse. 2002 Jul;14(3):253-69.

PMID:
12087686
13.

Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders.

Looman J.

Sex Abuse. 2006 Apr;18(2):193-206.

PMID:
16598660
14.

Men who molest their sexually immature daughters: is a special explanation required?

Rice ME, Harris GT.

J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 May;111(2):329-39.

PMID:
12003454
15.

Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type.

Bartosh DL, Garby T, Lewis D, Gray S.

Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2003 Aug;47(4):422-38.

PMID:
12971183
16.
17.

[Recidivism risk assessment in sex offenders].

Pérez Ramírez M, Redondo Illescas S, Martínez García M, García Forero C, Andrés Pueyo A.

Psicothema. 2008 May;20(2):205-10. Spanish.

PMID:
18413079
18.

[Criminal recidivism among sexual offenders].

Bengtson S, Lund J.

Ugeskr Laeger. 2008 Dec 1;170(49):4035-9. Danish.

PMID:
19087745
19.

Construction and Validation of SRA-FV Need Assessment.

Thornton D, Knight RA.

Sex Abuse. 2015 Aug;27(4):360-75. doi: 10.1177/1079063213511120. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

PMID:
24379164
20.

Recent research (N = 9,305) underscores the importance of using age-stratified actuarial tables in sex offender risk assessments.

Wollert R, Cramer E, Waggoner J, Skelton A, Vess J.

Sex Abuse. 2010 Dec;22(4):471-90. doi: 10.1177/1079063210384633.

PMID:
21098823

Supplemental Content

Support Center