Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 76

1.

Putting ad hoc PCI on pause.

Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM.

JAMA. 2010 Nov 10;304(18):2059-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1509. No abstract available.

PMID:
21063016
2.

Predictors and outcomes of ad hoc versus non-ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions.

Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Walford G, Holmes DR, Jacobs A, Sharma S, Katz S, King SB 3rd.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr;2(4):350-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.01.006.

3.

Pre-procedural flow-mediated dilation associated to arterial spasm during transulnar coronary angiography and interventions.

Deftereos S, Giannopoulos G, Tousoulis D, Raisakis K, Kossyvakis C, Kaoukis A, Panagopoulou V, Tzalamouras V, Hahalis G, Pyrgakis V, Cleman MW, Stefanadis C.

Int J Cardiol. 2013 Apr 15;164(3):373-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Aug 31. No abstract available.

PMID:
22939741
4.

Association of involvement of major branches of coronary arteries with development of ventricular arrhythmias in the catheterization laboratory.

Chatterjee S, Chandra P, Guha G, Malik B, Shani J.

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2011 Nov;12(11):821-3. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32834becd7. No abstract available.

PMID:
21934520
5.

Why physicians favor use of percutaneous coronary intervention to medical therapy: a focus group study.

Lin GA, Dudley RA, Redberg RF.

J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1458-63. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0706-x. Epub 2008 Jul 10.

6.

PCI or CABG in coronary artery disease?

Taggart DP.

Lancet. 2009 Apr 4;373(9670):1150-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60574-2. Epub 2009 Mar 19. No abstract available.

PMID:
19303631
7.

Almanac 2011: stable coronary artery disease. An editorial overview of selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology.

Henderson RA, Timmis AD.

Heart. 2011 Oct;97(19):1552-9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300896. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
21900584
8.

Ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable coronary artery disease--a study of prevalence, safety, and variation in use from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR).

Krone RJ, Shaw RE, Klein LW, Blankenship JC, Weintraub WS; American College of Cardiology - National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Nov;68(5):696-703.

PMID:
17039514
9.

ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Coronary Artery Interventional Procedures: a Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Revise the 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on Cardiac Interventional Procedures).

Writing Committee Members, Harold JG, Bass TA, Bashore TM, Brindiss RG, Brush JE Jr, Burke JA, Dehmers GJ, Deychak YA, Jneids H, Jolliss JG, Landzberg JS, Levine GN, McClurken JB, Messengers JC, Moussas ID, Muhlestein JB, Pomerantz RM, Sanborn TA, Sivaram CA, Whites CJ, Williamss ES; ACCF/AHA/ACP Task Force On Clinical Competence and Training Members, Halperin JL, Beckman JA, Bolger A, Byrne JG, Lester SJ, Merli GJ, Muhlestein JB, Pina IL, Wang A, Weitz HH.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug 1;82(2):E69-111. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24985. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
23653399
10.

Percutaneous coronary intervention use in the United States: defining measures of appropriateness.

Marso SP, Teirstein PS, Kereiakes DJ, Moses J, Lasala J, Grantham JA.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb;5(2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

11.

Declining PCI volume: does low volume mean low quality?

Seto A, Kern MJ.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan 1;81(1):40-1. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24748. No abstract available.

PMID:
23281083
12.
13.
14.

Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II.

Farooq V, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Meliga E, Vergouwe Y, Chieffo A, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR Jr, Mack M, Feldman T, Morice MC, Ståhle E, Onuma Y, Morel MA, Garcia-Garcia HM, van Es GA, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW, Serruys PW.

Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):639-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60108-7.

PMID:
23439103
15.

Determining optimal population rates of cardiac catheterization: a phantom alternative?

Natarajan MK, Gafni A, Yusuf S.

CMAJ. 2005 Jul 5;173(1):49-52. No abstract available.

16.

Increasing rates of angioplasty versus bypass surgery in Canada, 1994-2005.

Hassan A, Newman A, Ko DT, Rinfret S, Hirsch G, Ghali WA, Tu JV.

Am Heart J. 2010 Nov;160(5):958-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.052.

PMID:
21095286
17.

ACP Journal Club. Nonemergency PCI without onsite cardiac surgery was noninferior to PCI with onsite services for MACE.

Wayangankar SA, Aronow HD.

Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 16;159(2):JC6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-02006. No abstract available.

PMID:
23856704
18.

Progress toward doing the right thing.

Blankenship JC.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb;5(2):236-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Feb 8. No abstract available.

19.

Impact of drug-eluting stents on treatment option mix for coronary artery disease in Japan.

Horiguchi H, Yasunaga H, Hashimoto H, Matsuda S.

Circ J. 2010 Aug;74(8):1635-43. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

20.

PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery.

Tomoda H.

N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 25;369(4):392. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1306996#SA1. No abstract available.

PMID:
23883386

Supplemental Content

Support Center