Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 94

1.

IRBs and ethically challenging protocols: views of IRB chairs about useful resources.

Sirotin N, Wolf LE, Pollack LM, Catania JA, Dolcini MM, Lo B.

IRB. 2010 Sep-Oct;32(5):10-9. No abstract available.

2.

How IRBs view and make decisions about social risks.

Klitzman RL.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Jul;8(3):58-65. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.3.58.

3.

Institutional review board guidance on pediatric research: missed opportunities.

Wolf LE, Zandecki J, Lo B.

J Pediatr. 2005 Jul;147(1):84-9.

PMID:
16027701
4.

US IRBs confronting research in the developing world.

Klitzman RL.

Dev World Bioeth. 2012 Aug;12(2):63-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00324.x. Epub 2012 Apr 20.

5.

Ethical attitudes of nurse, physician, and unaffiliated members of institutional review boards.

Rothstein WG, Phuong LH.

J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(1):75-81.

PMID:
17393970
6.

The investigator and the IRB: a survey of depression and schizophrenia researchers.

Fischer BA, George P.

Schizophr Res. 2010 Sep;122(1-3):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.12.019. Epub 2010 Jan 12.

7.

Policies and management of conflicts of interest within medical research institutional review boards: results of a national study.

Vogeli C, Koski G, Campbell EG.

Acad Med. 2009 Apr;84(4):488-94. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a8ae7.

8.

Competing commitments in clinical trials.

Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Joffe S, Albert K, Rosenbaum J, Simon L.

IRB. 2009 Sep-Oct;31(5):1-6. No abstract available.

9.
10.

Local IRBs vs. federal agencies: shifting dynamics, systems, and relationships.

Klitzman RL.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Jul;7(3):50-62. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.50.

11.

Clinical Research in Vulnerable Populations: Variability and Focus of Institutional Review Boards' Responses.

Kästner B, Behre S, Lutz N, Bürger F, Luntz S, Hinderhofer K, Bendszus M, Hoffmann GF, Ries M.

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0135997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135997. eCollection 2015.

12.

Frustrations in benchmarking IRBs: reflections after analyzing the United States' IRB registration database.

Vulcano DM.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Apr;7(2):34-6. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.2.34.

PMID:
22565581
13.

The ethics police?: IRBs' views concerning their power.

Klitzman R.

PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028773. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

14.

Research consent by adolescent minors and institutional review boards.

Mammel KA, Kaplan DW.

J Adolesc Health. 1995 Nov;17(5):323-30.

PMID:
8924437
15.

Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making.

Torke AM, Moloney R, Siegler M, Abalos A, Alexander GC.

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar;58(3):533-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02720.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

16.

"Members of the same club": challenges and decisions faced by US IRBs in identifying and managing conflicts of interest.

Klitzman R.

PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022796. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

17.
18.

Institutional review board community members: who are they, what do they do, and whom do they represent?

Klitzman R.

Acad Med. 2012 Jul;87(7):975-81. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182578b54.

19.

FRAMING EFFECTS ON PHYSICIANS' JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING.

Bui TC, Krieger HA, Blumenthal-Barby JS.

Psychol Rep. 2015 Oct;117(2):508-22. doi: 10.2466/13.PR0.117c20z0. Epub 2015 Oct 7.

PMID:
26444837
20.

The ethics of suicide research.

Lakeman R, Fitzgerald M.

Crisis. 2009;30(1):13-9. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.13.

PMID:
19261563

Supplemental Content

Support Center