Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 172

1.

Mendelian randomization: potential use of genetics to enable causal inferences regarding HIV-associated biomarkers and outcomes.

He W, Castiblanco J, Walter EA, Okulicz JF, Ahuja SK.

Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010 Nov;5(6):545-59. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32833f2087. Review.

2.

[Mendelian randomization approach, used for causal inferences].

Wang LN, Zhang Z.

Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 10;38(4):547-552. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.04.027. Chinese.

PMID:
28468080
3.

Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data.

Sekula P, Del Greco M F, Pattaro C, Köttgen A.

J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Nov;27(11):3253-3265. Epub 2016 Aug 2. Review.

4.

Mendelian randomization studies in coronary artery disease.

Jansen H, Samani NJ, Schunkert H.

Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 1;35(29):1917-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu208. Epub 2014 Jun 10. Review.

PMID:
24917639
5.

'Mendelian randomization': an approach for exploring causal relations in epidemiology.

Gupta V, Walia GK, Sachdeva MP.

Public Health. 2017 Apr;145:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.12.033. Epub 2017 Jan 21. Review.

PMID:
28359378
6.

Strengthening causal inference in cardiovascular epidemiology through Mendelian randomization.

Smith GD, Timpson N, Ebrahim S.

Ann Med. 2008;40(7):524-41. doi: 10.1080/07853890802010709. Review.

PMID:
18608114
7.

Limits to causal inference based on Mendelian randomization: a comparison with randomized controlled trials.

Nitsch D, Molokhia M, Smeeth L, DeStavola BL, Whittaker JC, Leon DA.

Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Mar 1;163(5):397-403. Epub 2006 Jan 12. Review.

PMID:
16410347
8.

Usefulness of Mendelian randomization in observational epidemiology.

Bochud M, Rousson V.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Mar;7(3):711-28. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7030711. Epub 2010 Feb 26. Review.

9.

Mendelian randomization: how genetics is pushing the boundaries of epidemiology to identify new causes of heart disease.

Thanassoulis G.

Can J Cardiol. 2013 Jan;29(1):30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Nov 29. Review.

PMID:
23199790
10.

Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects.

Burgess S, Thompson SG.

Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 15;181(4):251-60. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu283. Epub 2015 Jan 27.

11.

Mendelian randomization: use of genetics to enable causal inference in observational studies.

Verduijn M, Siegerink B, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Dekker FW.

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 May;25(5):1394-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq098. Epub 2010 Feb 26.

PMID:
20190244
12.

Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants.

Burgess S, Bowden J, Fall T, Ingelsson E, Thompson SG.

Epidemiology. 2017 Jan;28(1):30-42.

13.

Mendelian Randomization for the Identification of Causal Pathways in Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease.

Jansen H, Lieb W, Schunkert H.

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2016 Feb;30(1):41-9. doi: 10.1007/s10557-016-6640-y. Review.

PMID:
26791863
14.

Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference.

Didelez V, Sheehan N.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Aug;16(4):309-30. Review.

PMID:
17715159
15.

Beyond Mendelian randomization: how to interpret evidence of shared genetic predictors.

Burgess S, Butterworth AS, Thompson JR.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

16.

Can we apply the Mendelian randomization methodology without considering epigenetic effects?

Ogbuanu IU, Zhang H, Karmaus W.

Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2009 May 11;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-6-3.

17.

Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.

Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S.

Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;44(2):512-25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

18.

Inflammatory Biomarkers and Risk of Schizophrenia: A 2-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

Hartwig FP, Borges MC, Horta BL, Bowden J, Davey Smith G.

JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1226-1233. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3191.

PMID:
29094161
19.

Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method.

Burgess S, Thompson SG.

Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 May;32(5):377-389. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x. Epub 2017 May 19. Erratum in: Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 29;:.

20.

Methodological challenges in mendelian randomization.

VanderWeele TJ, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, Cornelis M, Kraft P.

Epidemiology. 2014 May;25(3):427-35. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000081. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center