Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

Automated registration of diagnostic to prediagnostic x-ray mammograms: evaluation and comparison to radiologists' accuracy.

Pinto Pereira SM, Hipwell JH, McCormack VA, Tanner C, Moss SM, Wilkinson LS, Khoo LA, Pagliari C, Skippage PL, Kliger CJ, Hawkes DJ, Silva IM.

Med Phys. 2010 Sep;37(9):4530-9.

PMID:
20964170
2.

Automated registration of diagnostic to prediagnostic x-ray mammograms: Evaluation and comparison to radiologists' accuracy.

Pinto Pereira SM, Hipwell JH, McCormack VA, Tanner C, Moss SM, Wilkinson LS, Khoo LAL, Pagliari C, Skippage PL, Kliger CJ, Hawkes DJ, Dos Santos Silva IM.

Med Phys. 2010 Sep;37(9):4530-4539. doi: 10.1118/1.3457470.

PMID:
28524565
3.

A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images.

Solves-Llorens JA, Rupérez MJ, Monserrat C, Feliu E, García M, Lloret M.

Med Phys. 2014 Aug;41(8):081903. doi: 10.1118/1.4885957.

PMID:
25086534
4.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.

Liang Z, Du X, Liu J, Yao X, Yang Y, Li K.

Acta Radiol. 2008 Jul;49(6):618-22. doi: 10.1080/02841850802014610.

PMID:
18568552
5.

MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation.

Mertzanidou T, Hipwell J, Cardoso MJ, Zhang X, Tanner C, Ourselin S, Bick U, Huisman H, Karssemeijer N, Hawkes D.

Med Image Anal. 2012 Jul;16(5):966-75. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

PMID:
22513136
6.

Quantitative evaluation of free-form deformation registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography.

Tanner C, Schnabel JA, Hill DL, Hawkes DJ, Degenhard A, Leach MO, Hose DR, Hall-Craggs MA, Usiskin SI.

Med Phys. 2007 Apr;34(4):1221-33.

PMID:
17500454
7.

A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms.

Sanjay-Gopal S, Chan HP, Wilson T, Helvie M, Petrick N, Sahiner B.

Med Phys. 1999 Dec;26(12):2669-79.

8.

Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.

Lee AW, Rajagopal V, Babarenda Gamage TP, Doyle AJ, Nielsen PM, Nash MP.

Med Image Anal. 2013 Dec;17(8):1256-64. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 17.

PMID:
23860392
9.

Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.

Skaane P, Gullien R, Eben EB, Sandhaug M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Stoeblen F.

Acta Radiol. 2015 Apr;56(4):404-12. doi: 10.1177/0284185114528835. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

PMID:
24682405
10.

A new validation method for X-ray mammogram registration algorithms using a projection model of breast X-ray compression.

Hipwell JH, Tanner C, Crum WR, Schnabel JA, Hawkes DJ.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2007 Sep;26(9):1190-200.

PMID:
17896592
11.

A comparison of methods for mammogram registration.

van Engeland S, Snoeren P, Hendriks J, Karssemeijer N.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Nov;22(11):1436-44.

PMID:
14606677
12.

Large breast compressions: observations and evaluation of simulations.

Tanner C, White M, Guarino S, Hall-Craggs MA, Douek M, Hawkes DJ.

Med Phys. 2011 Feb;38(2):682-90.

PMID:
21452705
13.

Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images.

Sahiner B, Chan HP, Hadjiiski LM, Roubidoux MA, Paramagul C, Bailey JE, Nees AV, Blane CE, Adler DD, Patterson SK, Klein KA, Pinsky RW, Helvie MA.

Acad Radiol. 2009 Jul;16(7):810-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.011. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

14.

A breast density index for digital mammograms based on radiologists' ranking.

Boone JM, Lindfors KK, Beatty CS, Seibert JA.

J Digit Imaging. 1998 Aug;11(3):101-15.

15.

Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression model.

Pisano ED, Acharyya S, Cole EB, Marques HS, Yaffe MJ, Blevins M, Conant EF, Hendrick RE, Baum JK, Fajardo LL, Jong RA, Koomen MA, Kuzmiak CM, Lee Y, Pavic D, Yoon SC, Padungchaichote W, Gatsonis C.

Radiology. 2009 Aug;252(2):348-57. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2522081457.

16.

Diagnostic performance of a Near-Infrared Breast Imaging system as adjunct to mammography versus X-ray mammography alone.

Collettini F, Martin JC, Diekmann F, Fallenberg E, Engelken F, Ponder S, Kroencke TJ, Hamm B, Poellinger A.

Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):350-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2276-2. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

PMID:
21947512
17.

Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.

Seo N, Kim HH, Shin HJ, Cha JH, Kim H, Moon JH, Gong G, Ahn SH, Son BH.

Acta Radiol. 2014 Jul;55(6):661-7. doi: 10.1177/0284185113503636. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

PMID:
24005560
18.

Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.

Chen L, Boone JM, Abbey CK, Hargreaves J, Bateni C, Lindfors KK, Yang K, Nosratieh A, Hernandez A, Gazi P.

Phys Med Biol. 2015 Apr 21;60(8):3347-58. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/8/3347. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

19.

Fusion of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography at 3.0T with X-ray mammograms: pilot study evaluation using dedicated semi-automatic registration software.

Dietzel M, Hopp T, Ruiter N, Zoubi R, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA, Baltzer PA.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Aug;79(2):e98-e102. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.017. Epub 2011 May 13.

PMID:
21570793
20.

Effect of Using the Same vs Different Order for Second Readings of Screening Mammograms on Rates of Breast Cancer Detection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Taylor-Phillips S, Wallis MG, Jenkinson D, Adekanmbi V, Parsons H, Dunn J, Stallard N, Szczepura A, Gates S, Kearins O, Duncan A, Hudson S, Clarke A.

JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):1956-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5257.

PMID:
27163985

Supplemental Content

Support Center