Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 88


Pulvinar and Affective Significance: Responses Track Moment-to-Moment Stimulus Visibility.

Padmala S, Lim SL, Pessoa L.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Sep 24;4. pii: 64. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00064. eCollection 2010.


The Distinct Role of the Amygdala, Superior Colliculus and Pulvinar in Processing of Central and Peripheral Snakes.

Almeida I, Soares SC, Castelo-Branco M.

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0129949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129949. eCollection 2015. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0141175.


Segregating the significant from the mundane on a moment-to-moment basis via direct and indirect amygdala contributions.

Lim SL, Padmala S, Pessoa L.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 29;106(39):16841-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904551106. Epub 2009 Sep 14.


Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a 'low road' to 'many roads' of evaluating biological significance.

Pessoa L, Adolphs R.

Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Nov;11(11):773-83. doi: 10.1038/nrn2920. Review.


Affective learning enhances visual detection and responses in primary visual cortex.

Padmala S, Pessoa L.

J Neurosci. 2008 Jun 11;28(24):6202-10. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1233-08.2008.


The functional logic of cortico-pulvinar connections.

Shipp S.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Oct 29;358(1438):1605-24. Review.


Effect of pulvinar lesions on visual pattern discrimination in monkeys.

Chalupa LM, Coyle RS, Lindsley DB.

J Neurophysiol. 1976 Mar;39(2):354-69.


Effect of attentive fixation in macaque thalamus and cortex.

Bender DB, Youakim M.

J Neurophysiol. 2001 Jan;85(1):219-34.


Amygdala Response to Emotional Stimuli without Awareness: Facts and Interpretations.

Diano M, Celeghin A, Bagnis A, Tamietto M.

Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 10;7:2029. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02029. eCollection 2016. Review.


The functional activity and effective connectivity of pulvinar are modulated by individual differences in threat-related attentional bias.

Hakamata Y, Sato E, Komi S, Moriguchi Y, Izawa S, Murayama N, Hanakawa T, Inoue Y, Tagaya H.

Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 5;6:34777. doi: 10.1038/srep34777.


Neural correlates of visual motion processing without awareness in patients with striate cortex and pulvinar lesions.

Barleben M, Stoppel CM, Kaufmann J, Merkel C, Wecke T, Goertler M, Heinze HJ, Hopf JM, Schoenfeld MA.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Apr;36(4):1585-94. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22725. Epub 2014 Dec 19.


Functional imaging of the human lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar.

Kastner S, O'Connor DH, Fukui MM, Fehd HM, Herwig U, Pinsk MA.

J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):438-48. Epub 2003 Sep 17.



Szirmai I.

Neuropsychopharmacol Hung. 2013 Mar;15(1):19-26. Review. Hungarian.


Neuronal responses to face-like stimuli in the monkey pulvinar.

Nguyen MN, Hori E, Matsumoto J, Tran AH, Ono T, Nishijo H.

Eur J Neurosci. 2013 Jan;37(1):35-51. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12020. Epub 2012 Nov 4.


Functional contributions of the primate pulvinar.

Robinson DL.

Prog Brain Res. 1993;95:371-80. Review.


Affective learning modulates spatial competition during low-load attentional conditions.

Lim SL, Padmala S, Pessoa L.

Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1267-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.003. Epub 2007 Dec 15.


The pulvinar regulates information transmission between cortical areas based on attention demands.

Saalmann YB, Pinsk MA, Wang L, Li X, Kastner S.

Science. 2012 Aug 10;337(6095):753-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1223082.


Neural activity in the visual thalamus reflects perceptual suppression.

Wilke M, Mueller KM, Leopold DA.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 9;106(23):9465-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900714106. Epub 2009 May 20.


From affective blindsight to emotional consciousness.

Celeghin A, de Gelder B, Tamietto M.

Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov;36:414-25. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 6. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center