Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 91

1.

Visual-object ability: a new dimension of non-verbal intelligence.

Blazhenkova O, Kozhevnikov M.

Cognition. 2010 Dec;117(3):276-301. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.021.

PMID:
20887982
2.

Trade-off in object versus spatial visualization abilities: restriction in the development of visual-processing resources.

Kozhevnikov M, Blazhenkova O, Becker M.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Feb;17(1):29-35. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.29.

PMID:
20081157
3.

Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style.

Kozhevnikov M, Kosslyn S, Shephard J.

Mem Cognit. 2005 Jun;33(4):710-26.

PMID:
16248335
4.

Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects.

Chouinard PA, Morrissey BF, Köhler S, Goodale MA.

Neuroimage. 2008 May 15;41(1):130-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Mar 10.

PMID:
18375148
5.

Object-processing neural efficiency differentiates object from spatial visualizers.

Motes MA, Malach R, Kozhevnikov M.

Neuroreport. 2008 Nov 19;19(17):1727-31. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328317f3e2.

PMID:
18852681
6.
7.

The neural fate of task-irrelevant features in object-based processing.

Xu Y.

J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 20;30(42):14020-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3011-10.2010.

8.

The path of visual attention.

Brown JM, Breitmeyer BG, Leighty KA, Denney HI.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 Feb;121(2):199-209.

PMID:
16321354
9.

Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.

He X, Humphreys G, Fan S, Chen L, Han S.

Brain Res. 2008 Dec 15;1245:116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.092. Epub 2008 Oct 15.

PMID:
18955038
10.

Hemispheric differences in the activation of perceptual information during sentence comprehension.

Lincoln AE, Long DL, Baynes K.

Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 28;45(2):397-405. Epub 2006 Aug 8.

PMID:
16893556
12.

Reliability, performance characteristics, construct validity, and an initial clinical application of a visual object learning test (VOLT).

Glahn DC, Gur RC, Ragland JD, Censits DM, Gur RE.

Neuropsychology. 1997 Oct;11(4):602-12.

PMID:
9345704
13.

Informational affordances: evidence of acquired perception-action sequences for information extraction.

Reppa I, Schmidt WC, Ward R.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Jun;19(3):418-28. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0223-0.

PMID:
22371198
14.

Separate channels for processing form, texture, and color: evidence from FMRI adaptation and visual object agnosia.

Cavina-Pratesi C, Kentridge RW, Heywood CA, Milner AD.

Cereb Cortex. 2010 Oct;20(10):2319-32. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp298. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

PMID:
20100900
15.

Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension.

Goodale MA, Meenan JP, Bülthoff HH, Nicolle DA, Murphy KJ, Racicot CI.

Curr Biol. 1994 Jul 1;4(7):604-10.

PMID:
7953534
16.

Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia.

Carey DP, Harvey M, Milner AD.

Neuropsychologia. 1996 May;34(5):329-37.

PMID:
9148189
17.
18.

Configural and analytical processing of familiar and unfamiliar objects.

Noudoost B, Adibi M, Moeeny A, Esteky H.

Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):436-41. Epub 2005 Mar 31.

PMID:
16099356
19.

Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Müller D, Winkler I, Roeber U, Schaffer S, Czigler I, Schröger E.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1179-88. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21271.

PMID:
19445610
20.

Separating visual perception and non-verbal intelligence in children with early brain injury.

Stiers P, De Cock P, Vandenbussche E.

Brain Dev. 1999 Sep;21(6):397-406.

PMID:
10487474

Supplemental Content

Support Center