Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT in evaluating coronary artery bypass grafts and of the native coronary arteries.

Romagnoli A, Patrei A, Mancini A, Arganini C, Vanni S, Sperandio M, Simonetti G.

Radiol Med. 2010 Dec;115(8):1167-78. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0580-6. Epub 2010 Sep 17. English, Italian.

PMID:
20852959
2.

Sixteen-slice multidetector computed tomography for graft patency evaluation after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Uva MS, Matias F, Mesquita A, Costa R, Baú J, Pedro A, Magalhães MP.

J Card Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):17-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2007.00479.x.

PMID:
18290881
3.

Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.

Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Chihara R, Yamamoto H, Miura Y, Kigawa I, Fukuda S, Miyairi T, Nakajima H, Hara K.

Am Heart J. 2007 Sep;154(3):519-26.

PMID:
17719300
4.

Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries: is 16-slice multidetector CT useful?

Türkvatan A, Biyikoğlu SF, Büyükbayraktar FG, Cumhur T, Duru E, Olçer T, Ulaş MM.

Diagn Interv Radiol. 2009 Mar;15(1):43-50.

5.

Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography.

Marano R, Storto ML, Maddestra N, Bonomo L.

Eur Radiol. 2004 Aug;14(8):1353-62. Epub 2004 Apr 22.

PMID:
15103498
6.

Multislice computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary bypass grafts and native coronary arteries: comparison with traditional angiography.

Auguadro C, Manfredi M, Scalise F, Mustica T, Vanoli E, Khouri T, Specchia G.

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2009 Jun;10(6):454-60. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283262c85.

PMID:
19395978
7.

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high-resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) versus coronary angiography.

Anders K, Baum U, Schmid M, Ropers D, Schmid A, Pohle K, Daniel WG, Bautz W, Achenbach S.

Eur J Radiol. 2006 Mar;57(3):336-44. Epub 2006 Jan 30.

PMID:
16446072
8.

Diagnostic accuracy of 16- versus 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts: a comparative study.

Şahiner L, Canpolat U, Aytemir K, Hazirolan T, Yorgun H, Kaya EB, Oto A.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Nov;15(5):847-53. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs335. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

9.
10.

Bypass graft and native postanastomotic coronary artery patency: assessment with computed tomography.

Andreini D, Pontone G, Ballerini G, Bertella E, Nobili E, Parolari A, Pepi M.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 May;83(5):1672-8.

PMID:
17462377
11.

64 slice computed tomography-a novel diagnostic method for evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass grafts.

Gomathi SB, Nandhini P, Ravikumar R, Ajit SM.

Indian Heart J. 2012 Jan-Feb;64(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/S0019-4832(12)60006-6. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

12.

Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts.

Sahiner L, Canpolat U, Yorgun H, Hazrolan T, Karçaaltncaba M, Sunman H, Kaya EB, Aytemir K, Oto A.

J Investig Med. 2012 Dec;60(8):1180-5. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e31826d901b.

PMID:
23076163
13.

Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts with 16-slice multidetector computed tomography.

Sahiner L, Oto A, Aytemir K, Hazirolan T, Karcaaltincaba M, Akata D.

Heart Surg Forum. 2012 Feb;15(1):E12-7. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20111075.

PMID:
22360898
14.

Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts.

Pache G, Saueressig U, Frydrychowicz A, Foell D, Ghanem N, Kotter E, Geibel-Zehender A, Bode C, Langer M, Bley T.

Eur Heart J. 2006 Apr;27(8):976-80. Epub 2006 Mar 9.

PMID:
16527826
15.

Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation.

Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, Pflederer T, Anders K, Daniel WG, Bautz W, Baum U, Achenbach S.

Circulation. 2006 Nov 28;114(22):2334-41; quiz 2334. Epub 2006 Nov 6.

16.

[Diagnostic study on the coronary artery bypass grafts lesions using 64 multi-slice computed tomography angiography].

Liu ZY, Gao CQ, Li BJ, Wu Y, Xiao CS, Ye WH, Ren CL, Liu GP.

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Feb 15;46(4):245-7. Chinese.

PMID:
18683756
17.

Accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for diseased coronary artery graft detection.

Tochii M, Takagi Y, Anno H, Hoshino R, Akita K, Kondo H, Ando M.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jun;89(6):1906-11. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.057.

PMID:
20494047
18.

Imaging and evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography.

Exarhos DN, Baltouka A, Mihas C, Kouerinis I, Dedeilias P, Argiriou M, Chondros D.

Hellenic J Cardiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;48(5):258-67.

19.

Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries.

Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, Van Geuns RJ, De Feyter PJ.

Radiology. 2003 Dec;229(3):749-56.

PMID:
14657312
20.

Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment of graft patency and native coronary artery lesions using 16-slice MDCT.

Stauder NI, Küttner A, Schröder S, Drosch T, Beck T, Stauder H, Blumenstock G, Claussen CD, Kopp AF.

Eur Radiol. 2006 Nov;16(11):2512-20. Epub 2006 May 3.

PMID:
16670866

Supplemental Content

Support Center