Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 75

1.

Consensus interpretation in imaging research: is there a better way?

Bankier AA, Levine D, Halpern EF, Kressel HY.

Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):14-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100252. No abstract available.

PMID:
20851935
2.

Considerations of prevalence and reporting environment for achieving realistic test conditions.

Taylor-Phillips S, Bankier AA, Levine D, Halpern EF, Kressel HY.

Radiology. 2011 Mar;258(3):959-60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.101948. No abstract available.

PMID:
21339357
3.

Measurement of observer agreement.

Kundel HL, Polansky M.

Radiology. 2003 Aug;228(2):303-8.

PMID:
12819342
4.

What factors affect the discrepancy rate between preliminary resident interpretations of neuroimaging studies and the final attending interpretation?

Chan S.

Acad Radiol. 2008 Jul;15(7):817-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.05.001. No abstract available.

PMID:
18572115
5.

Are onsite image evaluations the solution or are we trading one problem for another?

Raunig DL.

J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):e263-4; author reply e265. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3716. No abstract available.

PMID:
19901131
6.

Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, Ostelo RW, Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bouter LM, de Vet HC.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Mar 15;6:12.

7.

Statistics and methodology.

Obuchowski NA, Lieber ML.

Skeletal Radiol. 2008 May;37(5):393-6. doi: 10.1007/s00256-008-0448-1. No abstract available.

PMID:
18259744
8.

Rater scoring variability in the serial assessment of anxiety symptoms.

Targum SD, Busner J, Miller D, Braxton E.

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Feb;28(1):118-9. doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e318160d5d4. No abstract available.

PMID:
18204362
9.

Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?

Evans RG, Su DF.

Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2011 May;38(5):285-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2011.05508.x. No abstract available.

PMID:
21388434
10.

Toward consistent use of reporting scales in imaging studies.

Wagner RF.

Acad Radiol. 2008 Feb;15(2):137-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.11.009. No abstract available.

PMID:
18206612
11.

Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.

Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV.

Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. Review.

PMID:
17654487
12.

The clinical interpretation of research.

Pauker SG.

PLoS Med. 2005 Nov;2(11):e395. No abstract available.

13.

Human factors affecting the interpretation of fetal heart rate tracings: an update.

Santo S, Ayres-de-Campos D.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;24(2):84-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283505b3c. Review.

PMID:
22249147
14.

"Binary" and "non-binary" detection tasks: are current performance measures optimal?

Gur D, Rockette HE, Bandos AI.

Acad Radiol. 2007 Jul;14(7):871-6. Review.

PMID:
17626312
15.

Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist.

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Gibbons E, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Sep 22;10:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-82.

16.
17.

Characterizing the performance of diagnostic imaging systems.

Lopez H.

Acad Radiol. 1995 Jul;2(7):634-7. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9419616
18.
19.

Removing rater effects from medical clerkship evaluations.

Fisher WP Jr, Vial RH, Sanders CV.

Acad Med. 1997 May;72(5):443-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
10676373
20.

Reproducible research in medical imaging.

Roy Choudhury K, Gibson R.

Mol Imaging Biol. 2012 Aug;14(4):395-6. doi: 10.1007/s11307-012-0569-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
22696096
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center