Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 208

1.

Impact of measuring fractional flow reserve on decision-making in the cath lab in a cohort of patients being considered for coronary revascularization.

Lockie T, Perera D, De Silva K, Webb I, Pattinson S, Redwood S.

J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Sep;22(9):413-6.

2.

Outcomes of coronary stenoses deferred revascularization for borderline versus nonborderline fractional flow reserve values.

Depta JP, Patel JS, Novak E, Masrani SK, Raymer D, Facey G, Patel Y, Zajarias A, Lasala JM, Singh J, Bach RG, Kurz HI.

Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jun 1;113(11):1788-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

PMID:
24837255
3.

Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.

Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, Maccarthy PA, Van't Veer M, Pijls NH.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 22;55(25):2816-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096.

4.

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.

Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, van't Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrøm T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, De Bruyne B; FAME Study Investigators.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 May 28.

5.

Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease evaluated with noninvasive stress tests prior to cardiac catheterization.

Lachance P, Déry JP, Rodés-Cabau J, Potvin JM, Barbeau G, Bertrand OF, Gleeton O, Larose E, Nguyen CM, Noël B, Proulx G, Roy L, De Larochellière R.

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2008 Oct-Dec;9(4):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2008.02.002.

PMID:
18928947
6.

Fractional flow reserve guided coronary revascularization in drug-eluting era in Thai patients with borderline multi-vessel coronary stenoses.

Angkananard T, Wongpraparut N, Tresukosol D, Panchavinin P.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Feb;94 Suppl 1:S25-32.

PMID:
21721425
7.

Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease.

Berger A, Botman KJ, MacCarthy PA, Wijns W, Bartunek J, Heyndrickx GR, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):438-42.

8.

Physiological basis and long-term clinical outcome of discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve in coronary stenoses of intermediate severity.

van de Hoef TP, van Lavieren MA, Damman P, Delewi R, Piek MA, Chamuleau SA, Voskuil M, Henriques JP, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Spaan JA, Siebes M, Tijssen JG, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun;7(3):301-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001049. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

9.

Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial.

Layland J, Oldroyd KG, Curzen N, Sood A, Balachandran K, Das R, Junejo S, Ahmed N, Lee MM, Shaukat A, O'Donnell A, Nam J, Briggs A, Henderson R, McConnachie A, Berry C; FAMOUS–NSTEMI investigators.

Eur Heart J. 2015 Jan 7;36(2):100-11. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu338. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

10.

Functional assessment of coronary stenoses: can we live without it?

Pijls NH, Tanaka N, Fearon WF.

Eur Heart J. 2013 May;34(18):1335-44. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs436. Epub 2012 Dec 19. Review.

PMID:
23257950
11.

[Long-term prognosis in diabetic patients in whom revascularization is deferred following fractional flow reserve assessment].

Domínguez-Franco AJ, Jiménez-Navarro MF, Muñoz-García AJ, Alonso-Briales JH, Hernández-García JM, de Teresa Galván E.

Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):352-9. Spanish.

12.

Long-term follow-up after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment strategy in patients with an isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.

Muller O, Mangiacapra F, Ntalianis A, Verhamme KM, Trana C, Hamilos M, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Wyffels E, Heyndrickx GR, van Rooij FJ, Witteman JC, Hofman A, Wijns W, Barbato E, De Bruyne B.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov;4(11):1175-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Oct 26.

13.

Sex differences in the visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound versus fractional flow reserve.

Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Han S, Lee JY, Kim WJ, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Mintz GS, Park SJ.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun;6(6):562-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.02.016.

14.

Performing versus deferring coronary angioplasty based on functional evaluation of vessel stenosis by pressure measurements: a clinical outcome study.

Verna E, Lattanzio M, Ghiringhelli S, Provasoli S, Caico SI.

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2006 Mar;7(3):169-75.

PMID:
16645381
15.

Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography: insights from a large French multicenter fractional flow reserve registry.

Van Belle E, Rioufol G, Pouillot C, Cuisset T, Bougrini K, Teiger E, Champagne S, Belle L, Barreau D, Hanssen M, Besnard C, Dauphin R, Dallongeville J, El Hahi Y, Sideris G, Bretelle C, Lhoest N, Barnay P, Leborgne L, Dupouy P; Investigators of the Registre Français de la FFR–R3F.

Circulation. 2014 Jan 14;129(2):173-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006646. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

16.

The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: Insights from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial.

Kobayashi Y, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Yang HM, Lim HS, Pijls NH, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators.

Int J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;204:206-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.169. Epub 2015 Nov 27.

PMID:
26670174
17.

Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided.

Nam CW, Yoon HJ, Cho YK, Park HS, Kim H, Hur SH, Kim YN, Chung IS, Koo BK, Tahk SJ, Fearon WF, Kim KB.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(8):812-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.016.

18.

Severity of morphological lesion complexity affects fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenosis.

Takashima H, Waseda K, Gosho M, Kurita A, Ando H, Sakurai S, Maeda K, Kumagai S, Suzuki A, Amano T.

J Cardiol. 2015 Sep;66(3):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

19.

The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.

Lim HS, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Yong AS, Lee BK, Pijls NH, Fearon WF.

Int J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 15;177(1):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 20.

PMID:
25499342
20.

Very long-term clinical follow-up after fractional flow reserve-guided coronary revascularization.

Miller LH, Toklu B, Rauch J, Lorin JD, Lobach I, Sedlis SP.

J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Jul;24(7):309-15.

Supplemental Content

Support Center