Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 106

1.

Adaptive auditory risk assessment in the dogbane tiger moth when pursued by bats.

Ratcliffe JM, Fullard JH, Arthur BJ, Hoy RR.

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 7;278(1704):364-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1488. Epub 2010 Aug 18.

2.

The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach.

Ratcliffe JM, Fullard JH.

J Exp Biol. 2005 Dec;208(Pt 24):4689-98. Erratum in: J Exp Biol. 2006 Jul;209(Pt 14):2811.

3.

Acoustic feature recognition in the dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera.

Fullard JH, Ratcliffe JM, Christie CG.

J Exp Biol. 2007 Jul;210(Pt 14):2481-8.

5.

Tiger moths and the threat of bats: decision-making based on the activity of a single sensory neuron.

Ratcliffe JM, Fullard JH, Arthur BJ, Hoy RR.

Biol Lett. 2009 Jun 23;5(3):368-71. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0079. Epub 2009 Mar 25.

6.

Tiger moth jams bat sonar.

Corcoran AJ, Barber JR, Conner WE.

Science. 2009 Jul 17;325(5938):325-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1174096.

7.

Auditory encoding during the last moment of a moth's life.

Fullard JH, Dawson JW, Jacobs DS.

J Exp Biol. 2003 Jan;206(Pt 2):281-94.

8.

Tiger moth responses to a simulated bat attack: timing and duty cycle.

Barber JR, Conner WE.

J Exp Biol. 2006 Jul;209(Pt 14):2637-50.

9.

How do tiger moths jam bat sonar?

Corcoran AJ, Barber JR, Hristov NI, Conner WE.

J Exp Biol. 2011 Jul 15;214(Pt 14):2416-25. doi: 10.1242/jeb.054783.

11.

Naïve bats discriminate arctiid moth warning sounds but generalize their aposematic meaning.

Barber JR, Chadwell BA, Garrett N, Schmidt-French B, Conner WE.

J Exp Biol. 2009 Jul;212(Pt 14):2141-8. doi: 10.1242/jeb.029991.

12.

An aerial-hawking bat uses stealth echolocation to counter moth hearing.

Goerlitz HR, ter Hofstede HM, Zeale MR, Jones G, Holderied MW.

Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 14;20(17):1568-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.046. Epub 2010 Aug 19. Erratum in: Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 14;20(17):1588.

13.

Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race.

Hristov NI, Conner WE.

Naturwissenschaften. 2005 Apr;92(4):164-9. Epub 2005 Mar 17.

PMID:
15772807
14.

Sensory ecology of predator-prey interactions: responses of the AN2 interneuron in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus to the echolocation calls of sympatric bats.

Fullard JH, Ratcliffe JM, Guignion C.

J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Jul;191(7):605-18. Epub 2005 May 11.

PMID:
15886992
15.

High duty cycle pulses suppress orientation flights of crambid moths.

Nakano R, Ihara F, Mishiro K, Toyama M, Toda S.

J Insect Physiol. 2015 Dec;83:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 5.

PMID:
26549128
16.

Acoustic mimicry in a predator-prey interaction.

Barber JR, Conner WE.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 29;104(22):9331-4. Epub 2007 May 21.

17.

Keeping up with bats: dynamic auditory tuning in a moth.

Windmill JF, Jackson JC, Tuck EJ, Robert D.

Curr Biol. 2006 Dec 19;16(24):2418-23.

18.
19.

Tempo and mode of antibat ultrasound production and sonar jamming in the diverse hawkmoth radiation.

Kawahara AY, Barber JR.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 19;112(20):6407-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416679112. Epub 2015 May 4.

20.

To females of a noctuid moth, male courtship songs are nothing more than bat echolocation calls.

Nakano R, Takanashi T, Skals N, Surlykke A, Ishikawa Y.

Biol Lett. 2010 Oct 23;6(5):582-4. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0058. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

Supplemental Content

Support Center