Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 228

1.

Assessment of computerized treatment planning system accuracy in calculating wedge factors of physical wedged fields for 6 MV photon beams.

Muhammad W, Maqbool M, Shahid M, Hussain A, Tahir S, Matiullah, Rooh G, Ahmad T, Lee SH.

Phys Med. 2011 Jul;27(3):135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jul 23.

PMID:
20655782
2.

Measurements of basic parameters in wedged high-energy photon beams using a mini-phantom.

Georg D, Garibaldi C, Dutreix A.

Phys Med Biol. 1997 Sep;42(9):1821-31.

PMID:
9308086
3.

AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.

Panettieri V, Barsoum P, Westermark M, Brualla L, Lax I.

Radiother Oncol. 2009 Oct;93(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.05.010. Epub 2009 Jun 21.

PMID:
19541380
4.

Monitor unit calculations for wedged asymmetric photon beams.

Smulders B, Bruinvis IA, Mijnheer BJ.

Phys Med Biol. 2002 Jun 21;47(12):2013-30.

PMID:
12118598
5.

Beam-hardening effects of wedges on a spoiled 6 MV beam.

Lee PC, Glasgow GP.

Med Dosim. 1994 Fall;19(3):141-4.

PMID:
7818752
6.

Surface dose and build-up region measurements with wedge filters for 6 and 18 MV photon beams.

Bilge H, Ozbek N, Okutan M, Cakir A, Acar H.

Jpn J Radiol. 2010 Feb;28(2):110-6. doi: 10.1007/s11604-009-0393-5. Epub 2010 Feb 26.

PMID:
20182845
7.
8.

A Monte Carlo study on internal wedges using BEAM.

van der Zee W, Welleweerd J.

Med Phys. 2002 May;29(5):876-85.

PMID:
12033584
9.

Measurements of primary off-axis ratios in wedged asymmetric photon fields: a formalism for dose and monitor unit calculations.

Mihailidis DN, Tomara PD, Gibbons JP.

Phys Med Biol. 2005 May 7;50(9):2003-14. Epub 2005 Apr 13. Erratum in: Phys Med Biol. 2005 Oct 21;50(20):4955-6.

PMID:
15843733
11.

[The estimation of the absorbed dose with wedge fields].

Ferri A, Ruggeri R.

Radiol Med. 1997 Oct;94(4):385-7. Italian.

PMID:
9465247
12.

Dose calculation and dosimetry tests for clinical implementation of 1D tissue-deficit compensation by a single dynamic absorber.

Corletto D, Fiorino C, Cattaneo GM, Mangili P, Calandrino R.

Radiother Oncol. 1998 Apr;47(1):53-62.

PMID:
9632293
13.

Dosimetric characteristics of wedged fields.

Sidhu NP, Breitman K.

Med Dosim. 1994 Spring;19(1):35-41.

PMID:
8003205
14.

Dosimetric Characteristics of 6 MV Modified Beams by Physical Wedges of a Siemens Linear Accelerator.

Zabihzadeh M, Birgani MJ, Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi M, Arvandi S, Hoseini SM, Fadaei M.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(4):1685-9.

15.
16.

Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.

Ahmad M, Deng J, Lund MW, Chen Z, Kimmett J, Moran MS, Nath R.

Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jan 21;54(2):447-65. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/2/018. Epub 2008 Dec 19.

PMID:
19098353
17.

Monte Carlo modelling of a virtual wedge.

Verhaegen F, Das IJ.

Phys Med Biol. 1999 Dec;44(12):N251-9.

PMID:
10616157
18.

A practical method to calculate head scatter factors in wedged rectangular and irregular MLC shaped beams for external and internal wedges.

Georg D, Olofsson J, Künzler T, Aiginger H, Karlsson M.

Phys Med Biol. 2004 Oct 21;49(20):4689-700.

PMID:
15566168
19.

Clinical validation of the Acuros XB photon dose calculation algorithm, a grid-based Boltzmann equation solver.

Hoffmann L, Jørgensen MB, Muren LP, Petersen JB.

Acta Oncol. 2012 Mar;51(3):376-85. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.629209. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

PMID:
22060134
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center