Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 120

1.

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials.

Jung NH, Delvendahl I, Kuhnke NG, Hauschke D, Stolle S, Mall V.

Brain Stimul. 2010 Apr;3(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 31.

PMID:
20633437
2.

Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials.

Julkunen P, Säisänen L, Danner N, Niskanen E, Hukkanen T, Mervaala E, Könönen M.

Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):790-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.040. Epub 2008 Oct 11.

PMID:
18976714
3.

Does second-scale intertrial interval affect motor evoked potentials induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation?

Julkunen P, Säisänen L, Hukkanen T, Danner N, Könönen M.

Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):526-32. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

PMID:
21962979
4.

The effect of coil type and navigation on the reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Fleming MK, Sorinola IO, Newham DJ, Roberts-Lewis SF, Bergmann JH.

IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Sep;20(5):617-25. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2202692. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

PMID:
22695363
5.

TMS-related potentials and artifacts in combined TMS-EEG measurements: Comparison of three different TMS devices.

Van Doren J, Langguth B, Schecklmann M.

Neurophysiol Clin. 2015 May;45(2):159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

PMID:
25892330
6.

EEG oscillations and magnetically evoked motor potentials reflect motor system excitability in overlapping neuronal populations.

Mäki H, Ilmoniemi RJ.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;121(4):492-501. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.078. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

PMID:
20093074
7.

Time-varying coupling of EEG oscillations predicts excitability fluctuations in the primary motor cortex as reflected by motor evoked potentials amplitude: an EEG-TMS study.

Ferreri F, Vecchio F, Ponzo D, Pasqualetti P, Rossini PM.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 May;35(5):1969-80. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22306. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

PMID:
23868714
8.

Inter- and intra-subject variability of motor cortex plasticity following continuous theta-burst stimulation.

Vallence AM, Goldsworthy MR, Hodyl NA, Semmler JG, Pitcher JB, Ridding MC.

Neuroscience. 2015 Sep 24;304:266-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.043. Epub 2015 Jul 21.

PMID:
26208843
9.

An initial transient-state and reliable measures of corticospinal excitability in TMS studies.

Schmidt S, Cichy RM, Kraft A, Brocke J, Irlbacher K, Brandt SA.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 May;120(5):987-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.164. Epub 2009 Apr 8.

PMID:
19359215
10.

Lateralization of forelimb motor evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in rats.

Rotenberg A, Muller PA, Vahabzadeh-Hagh AM, Navarro X, López-Vales R, Pascual-Leone A, Jensen F.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;121(1):104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Nov 8.

11.

Differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by navigated mapping of optimal TMS current directions in healthy subjects.

Bashir S, Perez JM, Horvath JC, Pascual-Leone A.

J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Aug;30(4):390-5. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31829dda6b.

12.

Intra-rater reliability of a transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to obtain motor evoked potentials.

Livingston SC, Ingersoll CD.

Int J Neurosci. 2008 Feb;118(2):239-56. doi: 10.1080/00207450701668020.

PMID:
18205080
13.

The amplitude of lower leg motor evoked potentials is a reliable measure when controlled for torque and motor task.

van Hedel HJ, Murer C, Dietz V, Curt A.

J Neurol. 2007 Aug;254(8):1089-98. Epub 2007 Apr 13.

PMID:
17431701
14.

Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Kojima S, Onishi H, Sugawara K, Kirimoto H, Suzuki M, Tamaki H.

BMC Neurosci. 2013 Apr 2;14:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-43.

15.

Impact of coil position and electrophysiological monitoring on determination of motor thresholds to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Conforto AB, Z'Graggen WJ, Kohl AS, Rösler KM, Kaelin-Lang A.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;115(4):812-9.

PMID:
15003761
16.

The number of full-sine cycles per pulse influences the efficacy of multicycle transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Pechmann A, Delvendahl I, Bergmann TO, Ritter C, Hartwigsen G, Gleich B, Gattinger N, Mall V, Siebner HR.

Brain Stimul. 2012 Apr;5(2):148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

PMID:
22037129
17.

Automated TMS hotspot-hunting using a closed loop threshold-based algorithm.

Meincke J, Hewitt M, Batsikadze G, Liebetanz D.

Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):509-517. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

PMID:
26385012
18.

Human brain cortical correlates of short-latency afferent inhibition: a combined EEG-TMS study.

Ferreri F, Ponzo D, Hukkanen T, Mervaala E, Könönen M, Pasqualetti P, Vecchio F, Rossini PM, Määttä S.

J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jul;108(1):314-23. doi: 10.1152/jn.00796.2011. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

19.

A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials.

Goetz SM, Luber B, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV.

Brain Stimul. 2014 Jul-Aug;7(4):541-52. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

20.

The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Sollmann N, Bulubas L, Tanigawa N, Zimmer C, Meyer B, Krieg SM.

BMC Neurosci. 2017 Jan 3;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12868-016-0321-4.

Supplemental Content

Support Center