Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 432

1.
2.

Commentary: new guidelines for NIH peer review: improving the system or undermining it?

Spiegel AM.

Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):746-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d7e130.

PMID:
20520019
3.

Trends in program project grant funding at the National Cancer Institute.

Broder S, Cushing M.

Cancer Res. 1993 Feb 1;53(3):477-84.

4.

Outcomes of National Institutes of Health peer review of clinical grant applications.

Kotchen TA, Lindquist T, Miller Sostek A, Hoffmann R, Malik K, Stanfield B.

J Investig Med. 2006 Jan;54(1):13-9.

PMID:
16409886
5.

Tracking publication outcomes of National Institutes of Health grants.

Druss BG, Marcus SC.

Am J Med. 2005 Jun;118(6):658-63.

PMID:
15922698
6.

Science and agriculture policy at Land-Grant Institutions.

Westendorf ML, Zimbelman RG, Pray CE.

J Anim Sci. 1995 Jun;73(6):1628-38. Review.

7.
8.

A critical view of past NIH research funding on tobacco and nicotine.

Hughes JR, Liguori A.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2000 May;2(2):117-20.

PMID:
11072449
9.

National institutes of health funding for surgical research.

Mann M, Tendulkar A, Birger N, Howard C, Ratcliffe MB.

Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):217-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181568e26.

PMID:
18216525
10.

Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.

Bonetta L.

Cell. 2008 Oct 17;135(2):201-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.051.

11.

Declines in NIH R01 research grant funding.

Mandel HG, Vesell ES.

Science. 2008 Oct 10;322(5899):189. doi: 10.1126/science.322.5899.189a. No abstract available.

PMID:
18845728
12.

Little science, big science: strategies for research portfolio selection in academic surgery departments.

Shah A, Pietrobon R, Cook C, Sheth NP, Nguyen L, Guo L, Jacobs DO, Kuo PC.

Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):1110-5.

PMID:
18043118
13.

NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.

Shalev M.

Lab Anim (NY). 2004 Mar;33(3):15-6. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
15235618
14.

Biomedical research funding. NIH uncovers racial disparity in grant awards.

Kaiser J.

Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):925-6. doi: 10.1126/science.333.6045.925. No abstract available.

PMID:
21852462
15.
17.

Growing pains for NIH grant review.

Bonetta L.

Cell. 2006 Jun 2;125(5):823-5.

18.

Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding of surgical research.

Rangel SJ, Efron B, Moss RL.

Ann Surg. 2002 Sep;236(3):277-86; discussion 286-7.

19.

Structure and process of federal funding for AD research.

Wells N, Hurley AC.

Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1999 Apr-Jun;13 Suppl 1:S117-9.

PMID:
10369531
20.

New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.

Dove A.

Nat Med. 2006 Jan;12(1):5. No abstract available.

PMID:
16397535
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center