Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 137

1.

Calcifications in digital mammographic screening: improvement of early detection of invasive breast cancers?

Weigel S, Decker T, Korsching E, Hungermann D, Böcker W, Heindel W.

Radiology. 2010 Jun;255(3):738-45. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091173.

PMID:
20501713
2.

Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.

Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Hermann G, de Csepel J, Estabrook A, Rademaker AW.

Ann Surg. 2002 Feb;235(2):246-51.

3.

High-grade histologic features of DCIS are associated with R5 rather than R3 calcifications in breast screening mammography.

Hayes BD, Brodie C, O'Doherty A, Quinn CM.

Breast J. 2013 May-Jun;19(3):319-24. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12106. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

PMID:
23600490
4.
5.

First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.

Weigel S, Batzler WU, Decker T, Hense HW, Heindel W.

Rofo. 2009 Dec;181(12):1144-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109831. Epub 2009 Oct 26.

PMID:
19859859
6.

Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.

Bluekens AM, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ.

Radiology. 2012 Dec;265(3):707-14. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111461. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

PMID:
23033499
7.

Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma.

Tabar L, Tony Chen HH, Amy Yen MF, Tot T, Tung TH, Chen LS, Chiu YH, Duffy SW, Smith RA.

Cancer. 2004 Oct 15;101(8):1745-59.

8.

Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening.

Hofvind S, Iversen BF, Eriksen L, Styr BM, Kjellevold K, Kurz KD.

Acta Radiol. 2011 Jun 1;52(5):481-7. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.100357. Epub 2011 Mar 28.

PMID:
21498306
9.
10.

Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review.

Hoff SR, Abrahamsen AL, Samset JH, Vigeland E, Klepp O, Hofvind S.

Radiology. 2012 Aug;264(2):378-86. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112074. Epub 2012 Jun 14. Erratum in: Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):367.

PMID:
22700555
11.

Aspects in mammographic screening. Detection, prediction, recurrence and prognosis.

Thurfjell MG.

Acta Radiol Suppl. 2001 Dec;42(424):1-22.

PMID:
12040855
12.

Influence of E-cadherin expression on the mammographic appearance of invasive nonlobular breast carcinoma detected at screening.

Doyle S, Evans AJ, Rakha EA, Green AR, Ellis IO.

Radiology. 2009 Oct;253(1):51-5. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2531090045. Epub 2009 Jul 31.

PMID:
19703859
13.

Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters.

Weigel S, Girnus R, Czwoydzinski J, Decker T, Spital S, Heindel W.

Rofo. 2007 Sep;179(9):892-5.

PMID:
17705112
14.

Mammographic and clinical characteristics of different phenotypes of screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a nationwide screening program.

Baré M, Torà N, Salas D, Sentís M, Ferrer J, Ibáñez J, Zubizarreta R, Sarriugarte G, Barata T, Domingo L, Castells X, Sala M.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Nov;154(2):403-15. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3623-9. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

PMID:
26531756
15.

Early detection of breast cancer through population-based mammographic screening in Asian women: a comparison study between screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers.

Chuwa EW, Yeo AW, Koong HN, Wong CY, Yong WS, Tan PH, Ho JT, Wong JS, Ho GH.

Breast J. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):133-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00687.x.

PMID:
19292798
17.

Mammographic casting-type calcification associated with small screen-detected invasive breast cancers: is this a reliable prognostic indicator?

Peacock C, Given-Wilson RM, Duffy SW.

Clin Radiol. 2004 Feb;59(2):165-70; discussion 163-4.

PMID:
14746787
18.

Reduction in false-positive results after introduction of digital mammography: analysis from four population-based breast cancer screening programs in Spain.

Sala M, Salas D, Belvis F, Sánchez M, Ferrer J, Ibañez J, Román R, Ferrer F, Vega A, Laso MS, Castells X.

Radiology. 2011 Feb;258(2):388-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100874. Erratum in: Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):308.

PMID:
21273520
19.

Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, Izadi M, Jebsen IN, Jahr G, Krager M, Niklason LT, Hofvind S, Gur D.

Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):47-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121373. Epub 2013 Jan 7.

PMID:
23297332
20.

Digital mammography screening with photon-counting technique: can a high diagnostic performance be realized at low mean glandular dose?

Weigel S, Berkemeyer S, Girnus R, Sommer A, Lenzen H, Heindel W.

Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):345-55. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131181. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

PMID:
24495234

Supplemental Content

Support Center