Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 118

1.

Digital versus film Fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity.

Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Ferrier NJ, Krupinski EA.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Nov;51(11):5846-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4803. Epub 2010 May 19.

PMID:
20484593
2.

Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.

Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, Weis E, Ting A, Hinz BJ, Greve MD.

Ophthalmology. 2007 Sep;114(9):1748-54. Epub 2007 Mar 21.

PMID:
17368543
3.

Grading diabetic retinopathy severity from compressed digital retinal images compared with uncompressed images and film.

Li HK, Florez-Arango JF, Hubbard LD, Esquivel A, Danis RP, Krupinski EA.

Retina. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(10):1651-61. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e3790b.

PMID:
20921928
4.

Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields.

Vujosevic S, Benetti E, Massignan F, Pilotto E, Varano M, Cavarzeran F, Avogaro A, Midena E.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;148(1):111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.02.031. Epub 2009 May 5.

PMID:
19406376
5.

Colour slides or digital photography in diabetes screening--a comparison.

Henricsson M, Karlsson C, Ekholm L, Kaikkonen P, Sellman A, Steffert E, Tyrberg M.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000 Apr;78(2):164-8.

6.

Mosaics versus Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy seven standard fields for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity.

Li HK, Esquivel A, Hubbard LD, Florez-Arango JF, Danis RP, Krupinski EA.

Retina. 2011 Sep;31(8):1553-63. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182084273.

PMID:
21522039
7.

Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.

Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Noble J, Aiello LM, Aiello LP.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;154(3):549-559.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.03.019. Epub 2012 May 23.

PMID:
22626617
9.

Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.

Saari JM, Summanen P, Kivelä T, Saari KM.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004 Apr;82(2):126-30.

10.

Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.

Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Krupinski EA.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jun;51(6):3184-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4886. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

PMID:
20053978
11.

Comparison of multiple stereoscopic and monoscopic digital image formats to film for diabetic macular edema evaluation.

Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Florez-Arango JF, Esquivel A, Krupinski EA.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Dec;51(12):6753-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5504. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

PMID:
20574011
12.

Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.

Schiffman RM, Jacobsen G, Nussbaum JJ, Desai UR, Carey JD, Glasser D, Zimmer-Galler IE, Zeimer R, Goldberg MF.

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005 Jan-Feb;36(1):46-56.

PMID:
15688971
13.

Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy.

Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, Clermont AC, Birkmire-Peters D, Aiello LP, Aiello LM; Joslin Vision Network Research Team.

Ophthalmology. 2001 Mar;108(3):572-85.

PMID:
11237913
14.

A comparison between one- and two-field 60 degree fundus photography when screening for diabetic retinopathy.

von Wendt G, Rönnholm P, Heikkilä K, Summanen P.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000 Feb;78(1):14-20.

15.

Comparison of film and digital fundus photographs in eyes of individuals with diabetes mellitus.

Gangaputra S, Almukhtar T, Glassman AR, Aiello LP, Bressler N, Bressler SB, Danis RP, Davis MD; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Aug 3;52(9):6168-73. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7321.

16.

Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.

Chow SP, Aiello LM, Cavallerano JD, Katalinic P, Hock K, Tolson A, Kirby R, Bursell SE, Aiello LP.

Ophthalmology. 2006 May;113(5):833-40.

PMID:
16650680
17.

Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy: accuracy of the Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system.

Fransen SR, Leonard-Martin TC, Feuer WJ, Hildebrand PL; Inoveon Health Research Group.

Ophthalmology. 2002 Mar;109(3):595-601.

PMID:
11874767
18.

Retinopathy screening in type 2 diabetes: reliability of wide angle fundus photography.

de Sonnaville JJ, van der Feltz van der Sloot D, Ernst L, Wijkel D, Heine RJ.

Diabet Med. 1996 May;13(5):482-6.

PMID:
8737032
19.

A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy.

Olson JA, Strachan FM, Hipwell JH, Goatman KA, McHardy KC, Forrester JV, Sharp PF.

Diabet Med. 2003 Jul;20(7):528-34.

PMID:
12823232
20.

Automated assessment of diabetic retinopathy severity using content-based image retrieval in multimodal fundus photographs.

Quellec G, Lamard M, Cazuguel G, Bekri L, Daccache W, Roux C, Cochener B.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Oct 21;52(11):8342-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7418.

PMID:
21896872

Supplemental Content

Support Center