Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 250

1.

Reporting quality and information consistency of randomized, controlled trials presented as abstracts at the American Urological Association annual meetings.

Turpen RM, Fesperman SF, Smith WA, Vieweg J, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):249-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.045. Epub 2010 May 16.

PMID:
20483151
2.

Duplicate presentations on prostate cancer at American Urological Association and European Association of Urology annual meetings.

Pop GH, Fesperman SF, Ball DA, Yeung LL, Vieweg J, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2009 Aug;182(2):674-8; discussion 678-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.04.024. Epub 2009 Jun 17.

PMID:
19535105
3.

Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved.

Hopewell S, Clarke M, Askie L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;59(7):681-4.

PMID:
16765270
4.

Factors associated with the full publication of studies presented in abstract form at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association.

Smith WA, Cancel QV, Tseng TY, Sultan S, Vieweg J, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1084-8; discussion 1088-9.

PMID:
17296415
5.

Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature.

Scales CD Jr, Norris RD, Preminger GM, Vieweg J, Peterson BL, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1463-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Aug 16. Review.

PMID:
18710745
6.

A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature.

Scales CD Jr, Norris RD, Keitz SA, Peterson BL, Preminger GM, Vieweg J, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1090-4; discussion 1094-5.

PMID:
17296417
7.

Quality of trials reported as conference abstracts in China: how well are they reported?

Duan Y, Li J, Ai C, Chen Y, Chen P, Zhang M, Hopewell S.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Oct;25(4):479-84. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990365.

PMID:
19845978
8.

Quality of abstracts describing randomized trials in the proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings: guidelines for improved reporting.

Krzyzanowska MK, Pintilie M, Brezden-Masley C, Dent R, Tannock IF.

J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):1993-9.

PMID:
15143092
9.

Study characteristics of abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the southeastern section of the American Urological Association (1996-2005).

Fesperman SF, West CS, Bischoff CJ, Algood CB, Vieweg J, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):667-71; discussion 671-2. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

PMID:
18082209
10.

Randomized controlled trials in pediatric urology: room for improvement.

Welk B, Afshar K, MacNeily AE.

J Urol. 2006 Jul;176(1):306-9; discussion 309-10.

PMID:
16753430
11.

Transition from congress abstract to full publication for clinical trials presented at laser meetings.

Akbari-Kamrani M, Shakiba B, Parsian S.

Lasers Med Sci. 2008 Jul;23(3):295-9. Epub 2007 Aug 3.

PMID:
17674120
13.

Abstract reporting in randomized clinical trials of acute lung injury: an audit and assessment of a quality of reporting score.

Burns KE, Adhikari NK, Kho M, Meade MO, Patel RV, Sinuff T, Cook DJ.

Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep;33(9):1937-45.

PMID:
16148463
14.

Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials published in the urological literature.

Breau RH, Gaboury I, Scales CD Jr, Fesperman SF, Watterson JD, Dahm P.

J Urol. 2010 May;183(5):1693-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.030. Epub 2010 Mar 17. Review.

PMID:
20299044
15.

The consistency between scientific papers presented at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and their subsequent full-text publication.

Preston CF, Bhandari M, Fulkerson E, Ginat D, Egol KA, Koval KJ.

J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Feb;20(2):129-33.

PMID:
16462566
16.

The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.

Berwanger O, Ribeiro RA, Finkelsztejn A, Watanabe M, Suzumura EA, Duncan BB, Devereaux PJ, Cook D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
19010643
17.

Impact of blinded versus unblinded abstract review on scientific program content.

Smith J Jr, Nixon R, Bueschen AJ, Venable DD, Henry HH 2nd.

J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):2123-5.

PMID:
12394728
18.
19.

Presentation of nonfinal results of randomized controlled trials at major oncology meetings.

Booth CM, Le MaƮtre A, Ding K, Farn K, Fralick M, Phillips C, Cescon DW, Meyer RM.

J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 20;27(24):3938-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.8771. Epub 2009 Jul 20.

PMID:
19620490
20.

Quality of reporting according to the CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer instrument at the American Burn Association (ABA) annual meetings 2000 and 2008.

Knobloch K, Yoon U, Rennekampff HO, Vogt PM.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 29;11:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-161.

Supplemental Content

Support Center