Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 302

1.

Effect of repeated applanation tonometry on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements.

Gaton DD, Ehrenberg M, Lusky M, Wussuki-Lior O, Dotan G, Weinberger D, Snir M.

Curr Eye Res. 2010 Jun;35(6):475-9. doi: 10.3109/02713681003678824.

PMID:
20465440
2.
3.
4.

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.

Halkiadakis I, Patsea E, Chatzimichali K, Skouriotis S, Chalkidou S, Amariotakis G, Papakonstadinou D, Theodossiadis G, Amariotakis A, Georgopoulos G.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2009 May;87(3):323-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01239.x. Epub 2008 Jul 9.

5.

[Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].

Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Detry MB, Ledoux A, Pourjavan S.

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007 Mar;30(3):260-70. French.

6.

Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.

dos Santos MG, Makk S, Berghold A, Eckhardt M, Haas A.

Ophthalmology. 1998 Dec;105(12):2260-3.

PMID:
9855157
8.

[Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].

Meyer MW, Yevelenko V, Hoy L, Meyer A, Erb C.

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2006 Nov;223(11):899-903. German.

PMID:
17131250
9.

Self-tonometry with the Ocuton S: evaluation of accuracy in glaucoma patients.

Sacu S, Vass C, Schemper M, Rainer G.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004 Aug;82(4):405-9.

10.

Clinical evaluation of applanation resonance tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Hallberg P, Eklund A, Bäcklund T, Lindén C.

J Glaucoma. 2007 Jan;16(1):88-93.

PMID:
17224756
11.

Icare ONE rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma.

Gandhi NG, Prakalapakorn SG, El-Dairi MA, Jones SK, Freedman SF.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;154(5):843-849.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

PMID:
22840485
12.

The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors.

Sandhu SS, Chattopadhyay S, Amariotakis GA, Skarmoutsos F, Birch MK, Ray-Chaudhuri N.

Ophthalmology. 2009 Jan;116(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.07.014. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

PMID:
18801579
13.

Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.

Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.

Eye (Lond). 2009 Feb;23(2):262-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703102. Epub 2008 Jan 25.

PMID:
18219335
14.

Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment.

Duch S, Serra A, Castanera J, Abos R, Quintana M.

J Glaucoma. 2001 Aug;10(4):261-5.

PMID:
11558808
15.

Pressure phosphene tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for measuring intraocular pressure before and after LASIK.

Shemesh G, Man O, Michaeli A, Varssano D, Lazar M.

J Refract Surg. 2007 Apr;23(4):405-9.

PMID:
17455836
16.

[Impression and applanation tonometry in irregular corneas. Comparison with intraocular needle tonometry].

Madjlessi F, Marx W, Reinhard T, Althaus C, Sundmacher R.

Ophthalmologe. 2000 Jul;97(7):478-81. German.

PMID:
10959183
17.

Changes in intraocular pressure following diagnostic mydriasis with cyclopentolate 1%.

Hancox J, Murdoch I, Parmar D.

Eye (Lond). 2002 Sep;16(5):562-6.

18.

Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Ku JY, Danesh-Meyer HV, Craig JP, Gamble GD, McGhee CN.

Eye (Lond). 2006 Feb;20(2):191-8.

PMID:
15803173
19.

Intraocular pressure elevation within the first 24 hours after cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma or exfoliation syndrome.

Levkovitch-Verbin H, Habot-Wilner Z, Burla N, Melamed S, Goldenfeld M, Bar-Sela SM, Sachs D.

Ophthalmology. 2008 Jan;115(1):104-8. Epub 2007 Jun 11.

PMID:
17561259
20.

Goldmann tonometry versus the Tono-Pen XL for intraocular pressure measurement: an evaluation of the potential impact on clinical decision making in glaucoma.

Carrim ZI, Lavy TE.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 Nov;29(6):648-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00680.x.

PMID:
19821927

Supplemental Content

Support Center