Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 279

1.

Impact of solids residence time on biological nutrient removal performance of membrane bioreactor.

Ersu CB, Ong SK, Arslankaya E, Lee YW.

Water Res. 2010 May;44(10):3192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.036. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

PMID:
20338613
2.

Comparison of recirculation configurations for biological nutrient removal in a membrane bioreactor.

Bekir Ersu C, Ong SK, Arslankaya E, Brown P.

Water Res. 2008 Mar;42(6-7):1651-63. Epub 2007 Oct 18.

PMID:
17991508
3.

Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.

Bal AS, Dhagat NN.

Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Review.

PMID:
12397675
4.

Effects of solid retention time on the performance of submerged anoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor.

Ng HY, Tan TW, Ong SL, Toh CA, Loo ZP.

Water Sci Technol. 2006;53(6):7-13.

PMID:
16749433
5.

Performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor system for biological nutrient removal.

Mouthon-Bello J, Zhou H.

Water Environ Res. 2006 May;78(5):538-47.

PMID:
16752615
6.

Biological nutrient removal in membrane bioreactors: denitrification and phosphorus removal kinetics.

Parco V, du Toit G, Wentzel M, Ekama G.

Water Sci Technol. 2007;56(6):125-34.

PMID:
17898451
7.

Toward a high-rate enhanced biological phosphorus removal process in a membrane-assisted bioreactor.

Monti A, Hall ER, Koch FA, Dawson RN, Husain H, Kelly HG.

Water Environ Res. 2007 Jun;79(6):675-86.

PMID:
17605336
8.
9.
10.

Mathematical models for biomass in membrane-BNR process for wastewater treatment.

Lee JY, Kwon KH, Kim SW, Min KS, Yun Z.

Water Sci Technol. 2010;62(3):541-6. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.090.

PMID:
20706001
11.

Enhanced removal of chemical oxygen demand, nitrogen and phosphorus using the ameliorative anoxic/anaerobic/oxic process and micro-electrolysis.

Bao KQ, Gao JQ, Wang ZB, Zhang RQ, Zhang ZY, Sugiura N.

Water Sci Technol. 2012;66(4):850-7. doi: 10.2166/wst.2012.258.

PMID:
22766877
12.

Effect of solids retention time on the performance and biological characteristics of a membrane bioreactor.

Cicek N, Macomber J, Davel J, Suidan MT, Audic J, Genestet P.

Water Sci Technol. 2001;43(11):43-50.

PMID:
11443985
13.

The mechanism of enhanced biological phosphorus removal washout and temperature relationships.

Erdal UG, Erdal ZK, Randall CW.

Water Environ Res. 2006 Jul;78(7):710-5.

PMID:
16929641
14.
15.

Performance of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor at different SRTs for domestic wastewater treatment.

Huang Z, Ong SL, Ng HY.

J Biotechnol. 2013 Mar 10;164(1):82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

PMID:
23313888
16.
17.

Enhanced reduction of excess sludge and nutrient removal in a pilot-scale A2O-MBR-TAD system.

Ventura JS, Seo S, Chung I, Yeom I, Kim H, Oh Y, Jahng D.

Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(8):1547-56.

PMID:
21866751
18.

Evaluation of membrane bioreactor process capabilities to meet stringent effluent nutrient discharge requirements.

Fleischer EJ, Broderick TA, Daigger GT, Fonseca AD, Holbrook RD, Murthy SN.

Water Environ Res. 2005 Mar-Apr;77(2):162-78.

PMID:
15816680
19.

Applicability of dynamic membrane technology in anaerobic membrane bioreactors.

Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, Tao Y, van Lier JB.

Water Res. 2014 Jan 1;48:420-9. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.054. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

PMID:
24156951
20.

A modified UCT method for biological nutrient removal: configuration and performance.

Vaiopoulou E, Aivasidis A.

Chemosphere. 2008 Jul;72(7):1062-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.044. Epub 2008 Jun 2.

PMID:
18519149

Supplemental Content

Support Center