Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 128

1.

Recommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance?

Bowles EJ, Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Elmore JG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):1152-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3064.

2.
3.

Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.

Baum JK, Hanna LG, Acharyya S, Mahoney MC, Conant EF, Bassett LW, Pisano ED.

Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):61-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101285. Epub 2011 Apr 18.

4.

Accuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics.

Aiello Bowles EJ, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Carney PA, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 May;190(5):1200-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3041.

5.

Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.

Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Rosenberg RD, Sickles EA, Buist DS.

Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):641-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533082308. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

6.

Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.

Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Cutter GR, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Abraham LA, Fosse JS, Carney PA.

Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):37-46.

7.

Frequency and Determinants of a Short-Interval Follow-up Recommendation After an Abnormal Screening Mammogram.

Pelletier E, Daigle JM, Defay F, Major D, Guertin MH, Brisson J.

Can Assoc Radiol J. 2016 Nov;67(4):322-329. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2015.11.001. Epub 2016 May 18.

PMID:
27209218
8.

Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.

Buist DS, Anderson ML, Smith RA, Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Monsees BS, Sickles EA, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Onega TL.

Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2):351-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132806. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

9.

Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.

Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Abraham LA, Lehman CD, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Voeks JH, Geller BM, Carney PA, Sickles EA.

Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):684-92.

PMID:
15734926
10.

Are there racial/ethnic disparities among women younger than 40 undergoing mammography?

Kapp JM, Walker R, Haneuse S, Buist DS, Yankaskas BC.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Nov;124(1):213-22. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0812-4. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

11.

Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested".

Caplan LS, Blackman D, Nadel M, Monticciolo DL.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Feb;172(2):339-42.

PMID:
9930778
12.

Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease.

Geller BM, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash R, Ernster VL, Yankaskas BC, Sickles EA, Carney PA, Dignan MB, Rosenberg RD, Urban N, Zheng Y, Taplin SH.

Radiology. 2002 Feb;222(2):536-42.

PMID:
11818625
13.

Radiologists' performance and their enjoyment of interpreting screening mammograms.

Geller BM, Bowles EJ, Sohng HY, Brenner RJ, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Elmore JG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):361-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1647.

14.

Breast MRI BI-RADS assessments and abnormal interpretation rates by clinical indication in US community practices.

Lee CI, Ichikawa L, Rochelle MC, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL, Sprague BL, DeMartini WB, Wernli KJ, Joe BN, Yankaskas BC, Lehman CD.

Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

15.

Concordance of BI-RADS Assessments and Management Recommendations for Breast MRI in Community Practice.

Lee AY, Ichikawa L, Lee JM, Lee CI, DeMartini WB, Joe BN, Wernli KJ, Sprague BL, Herschorn SD, Lehman CD.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jan;206(1):211-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14356.

16.

Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Accuracy of Two Types of Diagnostic Mammograms.

Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Carney PA, Sickles EA, Elmore JG.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Aug;205(2):456-63. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13672.

17.

Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.

Yasmeen S, Romano PS, Pettinger M, Chlebowski RT, Robbins JA, Lane DS, Hendrix SL.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Mar 19;95(6):429-36.

PMID:
12644536
18.

[Study on the management of patients following detection of a "probably benign" mammographic abnormality (ACR BI-RADS category 3): a review of 176 radiologists].

Barreau B, Tastet S, Picot V, Deghaye M, Brault I, Marelle P, Aucant D, Haber S.

J Radiol. 2004 Nov;85(11):1927-36. French.

19.

Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography.

Miglioretti DL, Smith-Bindman R, Abraham L, Brenner RJ, Carney PA, Bowles EJ, Buist DS, Elmore JG.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Dec 19;99(24):1854-63. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

20.

Positive predictive value of mammography: comparison of interpretations of screening and diagnostic images by the same radiologist and by different radiologists.

Halladay JR, Yankaskas BC, Bowling JM, Alexander C.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):782-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2955.

Supplemental Content

Support Center