Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 70

1.

Re: "Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses".

Levin B.

Am J Epidemiol. 1991 May 1;133(9):963-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
2028984
2.

Modelling covariate effects in observer agreement studies: the case of nominal scale agreement.

Guggenmoos-Holzmann I.

Stat Med. 1995 Oct 30;14(20):2285-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
8552905
3.
4.

Comparison of effect estimates from a meta-analysis of summary data from published studies and from a meta-analysis using individual patient data for ovarian cancer studies.

Steinberg KK, Smith SJ, Stroup DF, Olkin I, Lee NC, Williamson GD, Thacker SB.

Am J Epidemiol. 1997 May 15;145(10):917-25.

PMID:
9149663
5.

Key concepts in biostatistics: using statistics to answer the question "is there a difference?".

Szczech LA, Coladonato JA, Owen WF Jr.

Semin Dial. 2002 Sep-Oct;15(5):347-51. Review.

PMID:
12358639
6.

Antenatal steroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome: multiple gestation as an effect modifier.

Quist-Therson EC, Myhr TL, Ohlsson A.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999 May;78(5):388-92.

PMID:
10326882
7.

Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.

Greenland S.

Am J Epidemiol. 1987 May;125(5):761-8. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
3551588
8.

Statistical methods in epidemiology. IV. Confounding and the matched pairs odds ratio.

Rigby AS, Robinson MB.

Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Apr 15;22(6):259-65.

PMID:
10864128
9.

Interviewer effects in a cohort study. Results from the Massachusetts Women's Health Study.

Johannes CB, Crawford SL, McKinlay JB.

Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Sep 1;146(5):429-38.

PMID:
9290503
10.
11.

Multiple logistic regression models--what are they?

Campbell M.

Midwifery. 2004 Sep;20(3):236-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
15337279
12.

Using binary logistic regression models for ordinal data with non-proportional odds.

Bender R, Grouven U.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;51(10):809-16.

PMID:
9762873
13.

Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.

Ioannidis JP.

Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug 15;168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn156. Epub 2008 Jul 8. Review.

PMID:
18611956
14.
15.

Interpretation of the odds ratio from logistic regression after a transformation of the covariate vector.

Elswick RK Jr, Schwartz PF, Welsh JA.

Stat Med. 1997 Aug 15;16(15):1695-703.

PMID:
9265694
16.

Differential recall as a source of bias in epidemiologic research.

Neugebauer R, Ng S.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(12):1337-41.

PMID:
2254770
17.

Birth weight and subsequent risk of childhood primary brain tumors: a meta-analysis.

Harder T, Plagemann A, Harder A.

Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug 15;168(4):366-73. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn144. Epub 2008 Jun 25.

PMID:
18579539
18.
19.

A set of SAS macros for calculating and displaying adjusted odds ratios (with confidence intervals) for continuous covariates in logistic B-spline regression models.

Gregory M, Ulmer H, Pfeiffer KP, Lang S, Strasak AM.

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008 Oct;92(1):109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jul 7.

PMID:
18603325
20.

Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses.

Engels EA, Schmid CH, Terrin N, Olkin I, Lau J.

Stat Med. 2000 Jul 15;19(13):1707-28. Review.

PMID:
10861773

Supplemental Content

Support Center