Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 326

1.

Are we studying what matters? Health priorities and NIH-funded biomedical engineering research.

Rubin JB, Paltiel AD, Saltzman WM.

Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Jul;38(7):2237-51. doi: 10.1007/s10439-010-9982-9. Epub 2010 Mar 12. Review.

PMID:
20225125
3.

The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering and NIH grant process: an overview.

Wolbarst AB, Hendee WR.

Radiology. 2007 Jan;242(1):32-55. Review.

PMID:
17185660
4.

Comparing cutaneous research funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) with the US skin disease burden.

Hagstrom EL, Patel S, Karimkhani C, Boyers LN, Williams HC, Hay RJ, Weinstock MA, Armstrong AW, Dunnick CA, Margolis DJ, Dellavalle RP.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Sep;73(3):383-91.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.039. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

PMID:
26051697
5.

Impact of the National Institutes of Health on radiology research.

Itagaki MW.

Radiology. 2008 Apr;247(1):213-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2471070745.

PMID:
18372469
6.

Organizing the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. Part 3.

Maynard CD, Nagy EC.

Acad Radiol. 2002 Feb;9(2):249-51. No abstract available.

PMID:
11918380
7.

Does targeted, disease-specific public research funding influence pharmaceutical innovation?

Blume-Kohout ME.

J Policy Anal Manage. 2012;31(3):641-60.

PMID:
22764378
8.

Matching taxpayer funding to population health needs.

Hanna M.

Circ Res. 2015 Apr 10;116(8):1296-300. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.305585.

9.

Little science, big science: strategies for research portfolio selection in academic surgery departments.

Shah A, Pietrobon R, Cook C, Sheth NP, Nguyen L, Guo L, Jacobs DO, Kuo PC.

Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):1110-5.

PMID:
18043118
10.

Similarities and differences in philanthropic and federal support for medical research in the United States: an analysis of funding by nonprofits in 2006-2008.

Myers ER, Alciati MH, Ahlport KN, Sung NS.

Acad Med. 2012 Nov;87(11):1574-81. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826762f4.

PMID:
22914508
11.
12.

US-National Institutes of Health-funded research for cutaneous wounds in 2012.

Richmond NA, Lamel SA, Davidson JM, Martins-Green M, Sen CK, Tomic-Canic M, Vivas AC, Braun LR, Kirsner RS.

Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Nov-Dec;21(6):789-92. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12099. Epub 2013 Oct 17. Review.

PMID:
24134696
13.

The national institute of biomedical imaging and bioengineering and the extramural funding of imaging research.

Wallner PE.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Feb;1(2):87-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
17411531
14.

The association between scholarly impact and National Institutes of Health funding in ophthalmology.

Svider PF, Lopez SA, Husain Q, Bhagat N, Eloy JA, Langer PD.

Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

PMID:
24070807
15.

Informatics at the National Institutes of Health: a call to action.

Hendee WR.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Jul-Aug;6(4):267-71.

16.

Funding of research on headache disorders by the National Institutes of Health.

Schwedt TJ, Shapiro RE.

Headache. 2009 Feb;49(2):162-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01323.x.

17.

Politicizing NIH funding: a bridge to nowhere.

Epstein JA.

J Clin Invest. 2011 Sep;121(9):3362-3. doi: 10.1172/JCI60182. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

18.

NIH funding: what does the future look like?

Avantaggiati ML.

Science. 2007 Apr 13;316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. No abstract available.

PMID:
17436448
19.

NIH funding: what does the future look like?

Furcht LT.

Science. 2007 Apr 13;316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. No abstract available.

PMID:
17431152
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center