Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 165

1.

Nerve-sparing robotic prostatectomy in preoperatively high-risk patients is safe and efficacious.

Lavery HJ, Nabizada-Pace F, Carlucci JR, Brajtbord JS, Samadi DB.

Urol Oncol. 2012 Jan-Feb;30(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.11.023. Epub 2010 Mar 2.

PMID:
20189844
2.

Robot assisted radical prostatectomy for elderly patients with high risk prostate cancer.

Rogers CG, Sammon JD, Sukumar S, Diaz M, Peabody J, Menon M.

Urol Oncol. 2013 Feb;31(2):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.11.018. Epub 2011 Jul 30.

PMID:
21803614
3.

Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Trabulsi EJ, Zola JC, Colon-Herdman A, Heckman JE, Gomella LG, Lallas CD.

Arch Esp Urol. 2011 Oct;64(8):823-9. English, Spanish.

PMID:
22052763
4.

Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.

Ritch CR, You C, May AT, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Penson DF, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Smith JA Jr, Barocas DA.

Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.023. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

PMID:
24746665
5.

Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control.

Xylinas E, Durand X, Ploussard G, Campeggi A, Allory Y, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.

Urol Oncol. 2013 Jan;31(1):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.10.012. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

PMID:
21719321
6.

Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.

Murphy DG, Kerger M, Crowe H, Peters JS, Costello AJ.

Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1358-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.035. Epub 2009 Jan 9.

PMID:
19147274
7.

Role of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for clinical stage B2 prostate cancer.

Bigg SW, Kavoussi LR, Catalona WJ.

J Urol. 1990 Dec;144(6):1420-4.

PMID:
1700156
8.

The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.

Trabulsi EJ, Linden RA, Gomella LG, McGinnis DE, Strup SE, Lallas CD.

Can J Urol. 2008 Apr;15(2):3994-9.

PMID:
18405448
9.

A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS.

J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

PMID:
17936849
10.

Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients.

Catalona WJ, Bigg SW.

J Urol. 1990 Mar;143(3):538-43; discussion 544.

PMID:
2304166
11.

Histopathologic outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy.

Patel VR, Shah S, Arend D.

ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Jun 2;6:2566-72. Review.

12.

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men ≤50 years of age. Surgical, oncological and functional outcomes.

Labanaris AP, Zugor V, Witt JH.

Anticancer Res. 2012 May;32(5):2097-101.

PMID:
22593495
13.

Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Shikanov SA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL.

Urology. 2009 Sep;74(3):619-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.082. Epub 2009 Jul 9.

PMID:
19592075
14.

Incidence of positive surgical margins after biopsy-selected nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Graefen M, Hammerer P, Michl U, Noldus J, Haese A, Henke RP, Huland E, Huland H.

Urology. 1998 Mar;51(3):437-42.

PMID:
9510349
15.

The trifecta outcome in 300 consecutive cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy according to D'Amico risk criteria.

Ou YC, Yang CK, Wang J, Hung SW, Cheng CL, Tewari AK, Patel VR.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan;39(1):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

PMID:
23085148
16.

Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Huang MW, Robinson BD, Shevchuk MM, Durand M, Sooriakumaran P, Grover S, Yadav R, Mishra N, Mohan S, Brooks DC, Shaikh N, Khanna A, Leung R.

BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6 Pt 2):984-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10565.x.

17.

Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy.

Goharderakhshan RZ, Sudilovsky D, Carroll LA, Grossfeld GD, Marn R, Carroll PR.

Urology. 2002 May;59(5):709-14.

PMID:
11992845
18.

Candidacy for active surveillance may be associated with improved functional outcomes after prostatectomy.

Lavery HJ, Levinson AW, Brajtbord JS, Samadi DB.

Urol Oncol. 2013 Feb;31(2):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

PMID:
21795076
19.

Long-term biochemical recurrence rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of a single-center series of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Suardi N, Ficarra V, Willemsen P, De Wil P, Gallina A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Montorsi F, Carpentier P, Mottrie A.

Urology. 2012 Jan;79(1):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.045. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

PMID:
22088567
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center