Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 172

1.

Failed operative vaginal delivery.

Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth JC, Landon MB, Gilbert S, Spong CY, Varner MW, Caritis SN, Meis P, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Gabbe SG; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU)..

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1017-22. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bbf3be.

2.

Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity After Attempted Operative Vaginal Delivery According to Fetal Head Station.

Ducarme G, Hamel JF, Bouet PE, Legendre G, Vandenbroucke L, Sentilhes L.

Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):521-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001000.

PMID:
26244539
3.

Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.

Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, Landon MB, Gilbert S, Spong CY, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Gabbe SG; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU)..

Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;109(4):917-21.

PMID:
17400854
4.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes by Attempted Mode of Operative Delivery From a Low Station in the Second Stage of Labor.

Halscott TL, Reddy UM, Landy HJ, Ramsey PS, Iqbal SN, Huang CC, Grantz KL.

Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1265-72. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001156.

5.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.

Lappen JR, Hackney DN, Bailit JL.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):493.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.054. Epub 2016 May 7.

PMID:
27166014
6.

Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial.

Popowski T, Porcher R, Fort J, Javoise S, Rozenberg P.

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;46(5):520-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.14785. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

7.

Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.

Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, Gabbe SG; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network..

N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 16;351(25):2581-9. Epub 2004 Dec 14.

8.

Route of breech delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Sanchez-Ramos L, Wells TL, Adair CD, Arcelin G, Kaunitz AM, Wells DS.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Apr;73(1):7-14.

PMID:
11336715
9.

Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study.

Vistad I, Cvancarova M, Hustad BL, Henriksen T.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jul 24;13:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-153.

10.
11.

Attempted operative vaginal delivery vs repeat cesarean in the second stage among women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean delivery.

Son M, Roy A, Grobman WA.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):407.e1-407.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

PMID:
28153660
12.

[Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].

Ding X, Aimainilezi A, Jin Y, Abudula W, Yin C.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;49(10):736-40. Chinese.

PMID:
25537243
13.

Predictors of neonatal resuscitation, low Apgar scores, and umbilical artery pH among growth-restricted neonates.

Levy BT, Dawson JD, Toth PP, Bowdler N.

Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;91(6):909-16.

PMID:
9610995
14.

Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.

Bailit JL, Grobman WA, Rice MM, Wapner RJ, Reddy UM, Varner MW, Thorp JM Jr, Caritis SN, Iams JD, Saade G, Rouse DJ, Tolosa JE; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network..

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;214(5):638.e1-638.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

15.

Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons.

Alfirevic Z, Milan SJ, Livio S.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 12;(9):CD000078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000078.pub3. Review.

PMID:
24030708
16.

Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons.

Alfirevic Z, Milan SJ, Livio S.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000078.pub2. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(9):CD000078.

17.

Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.

Withiam-Leitch M, Shelton J, Fleming E.

Birth. 2006 Dec;33(4):284-8.

PMID:
17150066
18.

Preterm cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate: neonatal and neurologic morbidity.

Mendez-Figueroa H, Chauhan SP, Pedroza C, Refuerzo JS, Dahlke JD, Rouse DJ.

Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;125(3):636-42. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000673.

PMID:
25730227
19.

Scheduled cesarean delivery: maternal and neonatal risks in primiparous women in a community hospital setting.

Quiroz LH, Chang H, Blomquist JL, Okoh YK, Handa VL.

Am J Perinatol. 2009 Apr;26(4):271-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103155. Epub 2008 Nov 19.

20.

Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery.

Schmitz T, Carnavalet Cde C, Azria E, Lopez E, Cabrol D, Goffinet F.

Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):695-703. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163c435.

PMID:
18310373

Supplemental Content

Support Center