Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.

Safety and efficacy of transradial aortoiliac interventions.

Staniloae CS, Korabathina R, Yu J, Kurian D, Coppola J.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr 1;75(5):659-62. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22348.

PMID:
20088010
2.

Safety and efficacy of transradial vs transfemoral arterial primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: single-center experience.

Yip HK, Chung SY, Chai HT, Youssef AA, Bhasin A, Yang CH, Chen SM, Hang CL, Hsieh YK, Chen CJ, Chang LT, Sun CK, Wu CJ.

Circ J. 2009 Nov;73(11):2050-5. Epub 2009 Sep 15.

3.
4.

Transradial approach as first choice for stenting of chronic total occlusion of iliac and femoral superficial artery.

Antov S, Kedev S.

Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2013;34(3):13-24.

PMID:
24566011
5.

A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study.

Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 May;29(6):1269-75.

6.

[Comparison of the radial and femoral arterial approaches for coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction].

Philippe F, Meziane T, Larrazet F, Dibie A.

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2004 Apr;97(4):291-8. French.

PMID:
15182071
7.

Transradial approach to subclavian artery stenting.

Yu J, Korabathina R, Coppola J, Staniloae C.

J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 May;22(5):204-6.

8.

Aortoiliac stenting, determinants of clinical outcome.

Nawaz S, Cleveland T, Gaines P, Beard J, Chan P.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999 Apr;17(4):351-9.

9.

Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.

Dangoisse V, Guédès A, Gabriel L, Jamart J, Chenu P, Marchandise B, Schroeder E.

EuroIntervention. 2013 Jul;9(3):345-52. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I3A56.

10.

Transradial access as first choice for primary percutaneous coronary interventions: experience from a tertiary hospital in Athens.

Deftereos S, Giannopoulos G, Raisakis K, Kaoukis A, Kossyvakis C, Pappas L, Panagopoulou V, Mavrogianni AD, Theodorakis A, Perpinia A, Michelakakis N, Bobotis G, Pyrgakis V.

Hellenic J Cardiol. 2011 Mar-Apr;52(2):111-7.

11.

Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Yan ZX, Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, Liu YY, Shi DM, Guo YH, Cheng WJ.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 May 5;121(9):782-6.

PMID:
18701040
12.

The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route.

Rathore S, Roberts E, Hakeem AR, Pauriah M, Beaumont A, Morris JL.

J Interv Cardiol. 2009 Aug;22(4):336-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00479.x.

PMID:
19689657
13.

A randomised comparison of transradial and transfemoral approach for carotid artery stenting: RADCAR (RADial access for CARotid artery stenting) study.

Ruzsa Z, Nemes B, Pintér L, Berta B, Tóth K, Teleki B, Nardai S, Jambrik Z, Szabó G, Kolvenbach R, Hüttl K, Merkely B.

EuroIntervention. 2014 Jul;10(3):381-91. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I3A64.

14.

The Antegrade Approach Using Transbrachial Access Improves Technical Success Rate of Endovascular Recanalization of TASC C-D Aortoiliac Occlusion in Case of Failed Femoral Access.

Millon A, Della Schiava N, Brizzi V, Arsicot M, Boudjelit T, Herail J, Feugier P, Lermusiaux P.

Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct;29(7):1346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.04.073. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

PMID:
26122414
15.

Is percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery via transradial approach feasible for skilled transfemoral operators? Initial experience in an unselected population.

Tomassini F, Gagnor A, Montali N, Gambino A, Bollati M, Infantino V, Tizzani E, Varbella F.

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;14(4):193-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

PMID:
23768506
16.

Decreased complication rates using the transradial compared to the transfemoral approach in percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of routine stenting and glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor use: a large single-center experience.

Eichhöfer J, Horlick E, Ivanov J, Seidelin PH, Ross JR, Ing D, Daly P, Mackie K, Ridley B, Schwartz L, Barolet A, Dzavík V.

Am Heart J. 2008 Nov;156(5):864-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.044.

PMID:
19061699
17.

Transradial right and left heart catheterizations: a comparison to traditional femoral approach.

Gilchrist IC, Moyer CD, Gascho JA.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):585-8.

PMID:
16532498
18.

Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites.

Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, Schneider JE, Arrowood M, Newman WN, Zellinger MJ, Rose GC.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Sep;32(3):572-6.

19.

Ad hoc transradial coronary angioplasty strategy: experience and results in a single centre.

Galli M, Di Tano G, Mameli S, Butti E, Politi A, Zerboni S, Ferrari G.

Int J Cardiol. 2003 Dec;92(2-3):275-80.

PMID:
14659865
20.

Implications of in situ thrombosis and distal embolization during superficial femoral artery endoluminal intervention.

Davies MG, Bismuth J, Saad WE, Naoum JJ, Mohiuddin IT, Peden EK, Lumsden AB.

Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;24(1):14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.06.020. Epub 2009 Sep 11.

PMID:
19748214

Supplemental Content

Support Center