Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 114

1.

Physiological and psychophysical comparison between a lifting task with identical weight but different coupling factors.

Adams KJ, DeBeliso M, Sevene-Adams PG, Berning JM, Miller T, Tollerud DJ.

J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Feb;24(2):307-12. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c8c84e.

PMID:
20072069
2.

Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.

Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine LJ.

Ergonomics. 1993 Jul;36(7):749-76.

PMID:
8339717
3.
4.

[A psychophysical evaluation of NIOSH Lifting Equation in a Chinese young male population: a pilot study].

Xiao GB, Liang YX.

Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2008 Jun;26(6):341-5. Chinese.

PMID:
18771617
5.

A comprehensive lifting model: beyond the NIOSH lifting equation.

Hidalgo J, Genaidy A, Karwowski W, Christensen D, Huston R, Stambough J.

Ergonomics. 1997 Sep;40(9):916-27.

PMID:
9306742
6.

Validity of the baltimore therapeutic equipment work simulator in the measurement of lifting endurance in healthy men.

Ting W, Wessel J, Brintnell S, Maikala R, Bhambhani Y.

Am J Occup Ther. 2001 Mar-Apr;55(2):184-90.

PMID:
11761134
7.
8.

Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.

Hattori Y, Ono Y, Shimaoka M, Hiruta S, Kamijima M, Shibata E, Ichihara G, Ando S, Villaneuva MB, Takeuchi Y.

Ergonomics. 1996 Jun;39(6):862-76.

PMID:
8681928
9.

New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the revised NIOSH lifting equation.

Waters TR, Lu ML, Occhipinti E.

Ergonomics. 2007 Nov;50(11):1761-70.

PMID:
17972201
10.
11.

Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.

Lee K, Waikar A, Aghazadeh F.

J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1990 Jun;19(1):3-11.

PMID:
2092069
12.
13.
14.

The effect of asymmetry on psychophysical lifting capacity for three lifting types.

Han B, Stobbe TJ, Hobbs GR Jr.

Ergonomics. 2005 Mar 15;48(4):364-79.

PMID:
15804846
15.
16.

Usability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.

Dempsey PG.

Ergonomics. 2002 Oct 10;45(12):817-28.

PMID:
12487684
17.

A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting.

Hidalgo J, Genaidy A, Karwowski W, Christensen D, Huston R, Stambough J.

Ergonomics. 1995 Dec;38(12):2455-64.

PMID:
8586075
18.

Evaluation of the revised NIOSH lifting equation. A cross-sectional epidemiologic study.

Waters TR, Baron SL, Piacitelli LA, Anderson VP, Skov T, Haring-Sweeney M, Wall DK, Fine LJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Feb 15;24(4):386-94; discussion 395.

PMID:
10065524
19.

An evaluation of methods assessing the physical demands of manual lifting in scaffolding.

van der Beek AJ, Erik Mathiassen S, Windhorst J, Burdorf A.

Appl Ergon. 2005 Mar;36(2):213-22. Epub 2005 Jan 20.

PMID:
15694076
20.

Using NIOSH lifting guide decreases risks of back injuries.

Liles DH, Mahajan P.

Occup Health Saf. 1985 Feb;54(2):57-60. No abstract available.

PMID:
3982769

Supplemental Content

Support Center